a. without a cycle lane b. with a segregated cycle lane c. with cycles banned d. left as it is e. other - please state
Note - banning motor vehicles, though a favoured option of mine, is not a valid option.
For that bit an off road cyclepath (b?) would be pleasanter BUT the devilish details are in the treatment of junctions. At least the cycle lane should be 1 wider and 2 mandatory.
-- CTC Right to Ride Rep. for Richmond upon Thames
Can't say just from that picture, but the cycle lane is too narrow.
I agree that the cycle lane should be wider, but it's probably not too bad for going uphill (downhill it would be worse than useless, on the flat it would only be useful in rush hour).
Of the options suggested by Tom I'd opt for leaving it as it is, but I'd rather see a wider cycle lane.
-- Danny Colyer <http://www.redpedals.co.uk> Reply address is valid, but that on my website is checked more often "The plural of anecdote is not data" - Frank Kotsonis
Would this road be better for cyclists: a. without a cycle lane b. with a segregated cycle lane c. with cycles banned d. left as it is e. other - please state
While the traffic is like that, it's fine as it is, with the cycle lane fulfilling its only useful function of providing a clearer (but maybe not safer) route past the queue. But you have to teach your trainees when to resist the temptation it offers.
In light traffic, I doubt it makes any difference, as long as there's 4.5m from kerb to centre line.
Does it fill up with parked cars at quiet times?
Colin McKenzie
-- No-one has ever proved that cycle helmets make cycling any safer at the population level, and anyway cycling is about as safe per mile as walking. Make an informed choice - visit www.cyclehelmets.org.
On 8 Apr, 22:08, Danny Colyer <[email hidden]> wrote:
[Posted via Google Groups because my server is losing loads of posts - including my own]
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
www.johnballcycling.org.uk/photos/cyclane
Quoted message said:
Can't say just from that picture, but the cycle lane is too narrow.
I agree that the cycle lane should be wider, but it's probably not too bad for going uphill (downhill it would be worse than useless, on the flat it would only be useful in rush hour).
Of the options suggested by Tom I'd opt for leaving it as it is, but I'd rather see a wider cycle lane.
An extra foot of width would certainly help - but I don't find it too bad as a cycle lane.
The photo may be a little deceptive, (my camera was on maximum zoom (150mm)), the 'hill' is slight.
a. without a cycle lane b. with a segregated cycle lane c. with cycles banned d. left as it is e. other - please state
Quoted message said:
Note - banning motor vehicles, though a favoured option of mine, is not a valid option.
Where exactly is it? How wide is the road? What day is it? What time of day is it?
The A2 Shooters Hill Road across Blackheath. The red lorry in the distance (1500m away) is at the Sun-in-Sands roundabout. I was taking the photograph at the toucan crossing opposite the Blackheath Gate of Greenwich Park. At a guess, I would say the road is 10m wide. The day is Tuesday, the time is 10.52am.
If you tune into BBC1 on Sunday morning you will see the same road packed with runners waiting to start the London Marathon.
There's a nice map here: [1.8Mb download] www.london-marathon.co.uk/site/images/pdfs/start_map.pdf
The photo was taken from the A at the top left corner of the Blue Assembly Area.
Would this road be better for cyclists: a. without a cycle lane b. with a segregated cycle lane c. with cycles banned d. left as it is e. other - please state
While the traffic is like that, it's fine as it is, with the cycle lane fulfilling its only useful function of providing a clearer (but maybe not safer) route past the queue. But you have to teach your trainees when to resist the temptation it offers.
In light traffic, I doubt it makes any difference, as long as there's 4.5m from kerb to centre line.
a. without a cycle lane b. with a segregated cycle lane c. with cycles banned d. left as it is e. other - please state
Can't say if a segregated lane would be better, as one can't see from the single image what issues there would be regarding loss of right of way at junctions.
Nothing to gain by banning bikes as you wouldn't fit in another lane of cars.
The existing lane seems to give a clearish track, which you may not get without one.
Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
a. without a cycle lane b. with a segregated cycle lane c. with cycles banned d. left as it is e. other - please state
Note - banning motor vehicles, though a favoured option of mine, is not a valid option.
I don't know the area so this may not be a usable alternative, but a quick look at the map reveals a parallel minor road (Rochester Way) about 1km to the South.
So I'd probably remove the cycle lane completely from the main road, and put a Bicycle Boulevard in on Rochester Way.
But as I say - I've never been there - it could well be one way, or a door zone nightmare...
www.johnballcycling.org.uk/photos/cyclane Would this road be better for cyclists: a. without a cycle lane b. with a segregated cycle lane c. with cycles banned d. left as it is e. other - please state Note - banning motor vehicles, though a favoured option of mine, is not a valid option.
Where exactly is it? How wide is the road? What day is it? What time of day is it?
The A2 Shooters Hill Road across Blackheath.
Thanks. The A2, so some of the motor traffic will be /through/ traffic, on a mission, rather than /local/ tootling traffic. The best option then is to segregate the "through" motor traffic, to let it travel efficiently, and to free the current road for local, less stressed, traffic, and make travelling more pleasant for all.
Ah, there is one flaw with that idea though, it is no longer politically correct to build the motorways that we need to free our local roads from heavy "through" traffic, to reduce congestion, to reduce pollution, to reduce road casualties, and to increase journey reliability. So it looks as though the best option is "d", sorry.