R
HappyBiker wrote:
> The 'not fun' comment was, perhaps, due to different expectations. The
> experience for me was that it was all too subjective. i.e. all 'how
> does it feel'. - that's important, and even critical, I know (I ride a
> lot) but I'd also hoped for more expertise on the part of the fitter.
> More objective, then subjective within that. But, not sure how that'd
> play out realistically anyway.
This is interesting. I had the same feelings of "subjectivity" that
you describe when I went through the fitting process some years ago.
Afterwards, I almost wondered whether or not the "fit technician" had
actually ever ridden bike in his life. I think there is a tendency
sometimes to think that there are fit gurus out there that can just
size you up for a bit and then instantly perch you perfectly on a bike.
I would guess that being a good fit pro is about striking a balance:
You don't want to be too dogmatic in your own views but then you don't
want to leave everything to customer subjectivity either.
> The 'not fun' comment was, perhaps, due to different expectations. The
> experience for me was that it was all too subjective. i.e. all 'how
> does it feel'. - that's important, and even critical, I know (I ride a
> lot) but I'd also hoped for more expertise on the part of the fitter.
> More objective, then subjective within that. But, not sure how that'd
> play out realistically anyway.
This is interesting. I had the same feelings of "subjectivity" that
you describe when I went through the fitting process some years ago.
Afterwards, I almost wondered whether or not the "fit technician" had
actually ever ridden bike in his life. I think there is a tendency
sometimes to think that there are fit gurus out there that can just
size you up for a bit and then instantly perch you perfectly on a bike.
I would guess that being a good fit pro is about striking a balance:
You don't want to be too dogmatic in your own views but then you don't
want to leave everything to customer subjectivity either.