Road Cycling · Public discussion

Crit Pro has no cred!

Started by Steven L. Sheffield · · Last activity · 7 posts · 405 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
15 December 2004
Last activity
17 December 2004
Original author
Steven L. Sheffield
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
405
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Steven L. Sheffield" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    It's December 15th, and there has not been an announcement of another "big
    US cyclist" getting popped for doping, despite Crit Pro's pronouncement
    that
    there would be one by December 14th at the latest ... once again proving
    that Crit Pro is a mudslinging, anonymous [censored] with no credibility.

    What an amateur.

    What a fred.

    --
    Steven L. Sheffield

    You don't suppose Crit Pro was the Phonak extortionist, do you?
    --
    Bob C.

    "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
    T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)

  2. "Steven L. Sheffield" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    It's December 15th, and there has not been an announcement of another "big
    US cyclist" getting popped for doping, despite Crit Pro's pronouncement


    that

    Quoted message said:

    there would be one by December 14th at the latest ... once again proving
    that Crit Pro is a mudslinging, anonymous [censored] with no credibility.

    What an amateur.

    What a fred.

    Conspicuous by his absence he is.

    Yoda

  3. On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:45:30 GMT, "Jim Flom" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    Conspicuous by his absence he is.

    The alternative view on this is that once the police release him from
    custody, he will announce both his name and his suspension.

    I don't think we can give him full credit for 'predicting', since he
    would see his own notification letter first.

    And now we have six months of him telling everyone that he didn't know
    Viagra was on the banned list and besides, he has a demonstrated
    medical need, attested to by his psychiatrist.

    Curtis L. Russell
    Odenton, MD (USA)
    Just someone on two wheels...

  4. Ride on.
    That would make you and me about the only two original non-suck-ups to
    CP.
    Nice post.
    -Ken

  5. "k.papai" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Ride on.
    That would make you and me about the only two original non-suck-ups to
    CP.
    Nice post.
    -Ken

    True, he is a bugger, but some of that [censored] was interesting to read and it
    sort of gives the heads up. Glad it's not my head being shot off.

  6. k.papai said:

    Ride on.
    That would make you and me about the only two original non-suck-ups


    to

    Quoted message said:

    CP.
    Nice post.
    -Ken

    dumbass,

    the whole stolenundergroud/crit-pro thing lost all it's steam when the
    tour of georgia positives never happened.
    no one cares anymore

    the new hotness is recumbents.

  7. Curtis L. Russell said:

    And now we have six months of him telling everyone that he didn't know
    Viagra was on the banned list and besides, he has a demonstrated
    medical need, attested to by his psychiatrist.

    Viagra is required when having an enema ?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.