Schrodinger's cat said:"Tom Crispin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Schrodinger's cat said:"Tom Crispin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> I took a group of 12 Year 2 children (age 6/7) to Greenwich Park to
> hone their cycling skills.
>
> I caught this crash on camera.
>
> What happened? Who is responsible?
You?
Yes, I guess you are right too. If only I hadn't taught 'em to ride a
bike in the first place we'd never have been in Greenwich Park and
they'd have been enjoying a nice safe arithmetic lesson instead.
I didn't mean to irritate you, but you did ask. When you take a bunch of
kids to a park you are responsible for their safety. Who is if not you? That
doesn't mean to say that accidents will not happen. I think most reasonable
adults would say that an occasional accident is to be expected in these
circumstances. But you are still responsible for their safety!
You didn't iritate me. My reply was a light-hearted dig at those who
really do feel that cycling is a dangerous activity. I know and
understand my responsibilities, and as I hope is evident from the
photos, I do try to take every precaution, necessary and unnecessary,
with the safety of my charges.
Over ten years as a primary school teacher, and three years as a
cycling teacher I have come to understand that most parents take a
sensible view about accidents. I have had to deal with two fractures:
a broken arm from a child tripping on stairs, and a broken ankle from
slipping on mud. Parents see this as a part of childhood.
The worst cycling incident I have had to deal with is a nasty graze on
the hip - and that has been it - apart from trivial knocks and bumps.
However, what would really scare parents would be an incident
involving a car. Parents are well aware that a simple fall from a
bike will result in nothing more serious than a fracture; cars kill.