Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Cranklength

Started by William H. O'Hara, III · · Last activity · 22 posts · 898 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
5 July 2005
Last activity
7 July 2005
Original author
William H. O'Hara, III
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
898
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–22 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. William H. O'Hara said:

    I end up riding quite fast. I know it
    is quite inefficient. I am wondering
    if going to a short crank versus 172.5
    might be a good idea.

    I thought that the general trend for track cyclists who reach high rpm
    was to use shorter cranks. I would try to cut back some on the rpms to
    <=100 first, though.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm very tempted to try the speedplay.

    You might want to look at the Shimano SPD clone pedals available from
    Nashbar, a lot cheaper than Speedplay, to see if they help. Float makes
    cleat adjustment less critical- it allows you to setup your shoes less
    than perfectly without creating stress.

    Quoted message said:

    I tend to cruise around 100 rpm alot.
    At 80 rpm my knee really hurt bad
    on a 5 mile trial yesterday. My current
    plan is stay off for two weeks. I have
    a physical scheduled in two weeks.
    I'm thinking at the point to go back to
    50 miles a week.

    I don't think you necessarily have to quit altogether. If you have
    found that the pain comes on the upstroke, then try riding without
    pulling on the pedals; there's a lot of argument about whether pulling
    on the pedal stroke is of any value at an aerobic output level. I
    personally don't feel that it is for me under most circumstances.

    I think the key to recovery from injury is finding out what causes the
    pain and trying to adjust your riding so that it is pain free. If you
    don't solve the cause, it doesn't matter how long you rest, you'll be
    doing the same thing that caused the injury in the first place.

    Quoted message said:

    I had rushed myself up to 100 miles a week
    and perhaps it was part of my problem. I
    should have done more time at 90 miles a week
    and 80 miles a week.

    I don't know about that. It may not be the weekly mileage, but the
    length of the 60 mile ride. Four 25 mile rides is not going to be as
    stressful as two 20s and a 60, where the 60 came without much prep.
    OTOH, spread over four rides, the difference between 90 and 100 is only
    2.5 miles per ride.

    The result of stepping up mileage too quickly should not generally be a
    repetitive stress injury, it should be tired muscles.

  2. "Art Harris" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You might also try lowering your seat slightly. Too low
    will be very slightly inefficient, but won't hurt. Too
    high can easily cause pain.

    Disagree. Too low can also cause knee pain.

    I'm pretty sure that two low will cause
    knee pain for me. I don't want to lower it
    all.

    Bill

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.