Joe Cilinceon said:Sheldon said:Quoted message said:I just purchased this set from Sam's Club
http://www.samsclub.com/eclub/main_shopping.jsp?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&n=0&mt=a&coe=0&oidPath=0:-23542:-25822:-41015:956111%20&fid=1S10
I find it easy to clean and they cook perfectly. I found them to be
a very good set of pots and pans especially for the price and what
you get.
Those pots have those dumb glass lids with horrid metal trim where
schmutz collects. I don't call a set a bargain when it counts lids
and added tools as cookware pieces... and sets include those teeny
weeny toy r us sized pieces you'll never use... I've never found a
use for a 1 qt pot or a 6" fry pan... I suppose those go with a kid's
play house tea set. Sets are a waste of money, half the pieces will
never get used but will probably forever take up precious storage
space because you won't find the courage to toss them in the trash.
It makes far more sense to buy individual open stock pieces and no
need for them to match... whenever I see someone has has all matching
cookware I know right away they can't cook. I think it very limiting
when cookware is purchased for appearance rather than suitability...
I mean like why does anyone need a $300 8qt designer pot, non-stick
no less, for boiling friggin' water. duh Anyone spends more than $20
for an 8qt pasta/stock pot definitely has more dollars than brain
cells.
Sheldon
Actually I use both the 1 qt pot (heating soups, boiling eggs, rice etc) and
the 6" fry pan (2 egg omelets, browning onions for a sandwich).
OmeletS? You said you cook for two... so why would any normal brained
person go through the entire operation twice... choose a normal sized
pan and do a 4 egg omelet and serve half to each. By cooking omelets
sequentially by the time the 2nd is ready the 1st has cooled and become
rubbery... or don't you two eat together. Imagine you two going out to
eat breakfast, and ordering omelets... and the short order cook makes
your omelets one-at-a-time... the waitress brings them to the table
one-at-a-time or holds the 1st until both are ready. Either way
doesn't sound like a very good deal to me.
With those teensy pans your stove must be a pigsty from all the
spatter... unless you do all your cooking in low gear. Actually there
is nothing you can do with a 1qt pot and a 6" pan you can't do much,
MUCH better and with far less effort with a 2qt pot and 9"-10" pan...
the slightly larger pieces are more versatile and require no more
effort to clean. I never could find a spatula that works in a 6" pan
and a 1 qt pot is too small for cooking even 1 cup of rice. There's a
2 qt covered sauce pan on my stove at all times, perfect size for 1 cup
of rice, perfect size for reheating most anything, perfect for sauteing
one onion or any small quantity, even cooking one burger, especially
cooking just one burger because its high sides prevent spatter from
fercockting up my stove... I actually do my frying in a 6 qt braisier,
great for browning sausage, meat balls, a mess of home fries, most
anything, especially frying a mess of pork chops or a steak, because
it's sides being twice as high as a fry pan my stove barely gets but a
spatter or two. And I've never boiled less than a half dozen eggs,
even if I only need two I always do more and do those full hard and
stick em in the fridge, there're a zillion dishes where I would use
hard cooked eggs if they were available... heck, I wouldn't waste the
time and energy to boil a potful of water for only two eggs. Your
teensy pieces of cookware are tantamont to "A" cup bras, unless you're
a child playing grown-up neither makes sense. When I visualize a full
grown man wrapping his mitt around a one quart pot I imagine he can't
unroll but two turns when he puts on a condom. <G>
Sheldon