Road Cycling · Public discussion

Cooke DNF?

Started by Kenny · · Last activity · 6 posts · 534 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
12 May 2005
Last activity
13 May 2005
Original author
Kenny
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
534
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. After Cooke hit the barrier, he walked to the finish leaving his bike
    on the road. Don't you have to cross the finish with your bike in
    order to be ranked?

    Kenny

  2. "Kenny" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    After Cooke hit the barrier, he walked to the finish leaving his bike
    on the road. Don't you have to cross the finish with your bike in
    order to be ranked?

    Kenny


    If you crash in the last K (or did they change it to 3k as discussed?) you
    get the same time as the group you were in when you crashed, which is what
    Cooke got. However his official finishing position was dead last (190th or
    so)- behind everyone who did cross the line.

  3. trg said:

    "Kenny" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    After Cooke hit the barrier, he walked to the finish leaving his bike
    on the road. Don't you have to cross the finish with your bike in
    order to be ranked?

    Kenny


    If you crash in the last K (or did they change it to 3k as
    discussed?) you get the same time as the group you were in when you
    crashed, which is what Cooke got. However his official finishing
    position was dead last (190th or so)- behind everyone who did cross
    the line.

    Its 3K now :-)

    Jan

  4. I know there a rule like that when it comes to calculating time losses,
    but don't you have to cross the finish with your bike :
    1. to be in the stage result
    2. to start the next day

  5. "Kenny" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
    [email hidden]...
    |I know there a rule like that when it comes to calculating time losses,
    | but don't you have to cross the finish with your bike :
    | 1. to be in the stage result
    | 2. to start the next day

    Nope,

    From 2004 UCI rules governing stage races-

    2.6.026
    In the case of a duly noted fall, puncture or mechanical incident beyond the
    red flare, the rider or riders
    involved shall be credited with the time of the rider or riders in whose
    company they were riding
    at the moment of the accident. His or their placing shall be determined by
    the order in which he or
    they actually cross the finishing line.

    2.6.027
    If, as the result of a fall beyond the red flare, a rider cannot cross the
    finishing line, he shall be
    placed last in the stage and credited with the time of the rider or riders
    in whose company he was
    riding at the time of the accident.

    Similar rules for a prologue-
    2.6.005
    4. Any rider who suffers an accident during the prologue and is unable to
    complete the distance
    shall nevertheless race the following day and be credited with the time of
    the last rider to finish.

    So, if the last 3k is a sprint, then maybe next time Basso should take a
    dive in order to not lose seconds to Cunego 🙂

  6. thx

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.