On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 13:37:51 -0500, Alex Rodriguez <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...
Quoted message said:Ahh.. interesting, I guess I didn't bother looking at the auction too hard.
Shame though.. I too have seen quite a few ebay scams without any way of
alerting anyone.
You'd think ebay would do something about it, but stolen [censored] and fraudulent
[censored] probably makes up a good chunk of their business. Otherwise, you'd see
some sort of voting system I'm sure. Whereas people can vote an auction as
fraudulent, and the votes are shown right on the auction and weighed
according to the voters feedback.
But then again, you'd have those crazy hong kong power sellers voting all
their competition as fraudulent.. forget that idea.
Ebay makes all their money from the sellers, so they have to be very nice
to them. That is why all their policies favor the seller. As long as the
seller is paying up on time, they will probably not do anything to the seller.
OTOH, it's likely to the point of near certainty that the fraudulent
seller isn't going to use a payment method that actually traces back
to him. EBay knows that there's a problem in the area of fraudulent
sales listings, but thus far they haven't been willing to institute
the few changes that would be required in order to knock out the
common types that I've seen. They need to adopt the same new user
verification process that PayPal employs before allowing the new user
to establish himself as a seller, for one thing, and they really need
to have somebody taking a close look at sales listings posted by
zero-feedback accounts, particularly when there are lots of them from
a single userwith high item values. (Yes, of course, the fraudsters
can always start the auctions at one cent, but thus far that has not
typically been the case.)
--
Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
Some gardening required to reply via email.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.