Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

connex 10 speed chain

Started by Steve Karpik · · Last activity · 31 posts · 1,488 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
2 August 2005
Last activity
5 August 2005
Original author
Steve Karpik
Posts
31
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,488
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 31
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I rider that I coach crashed yesterday in a race on an uphill. She was
    standing and shifted to a harder gear on the rear derailleur.
    Something didn't work with the shift, it jammed or slipped and she lost
    her balance and crashed.

    I'm trying to sort out the obvious causes. It's a 10 speed Campy drive
    train with a Connex chain on a Cervelo 2.5 Chorus with FSA carbon
    cranks. Any idea whether these chains are prone to problems (missed or
    bad shifts under pressure)? I suppose it could be a derailleur
    adustment problem or chain stretching for that matter. But I'd just
    like to get people's thoughts on this chain. I tend to be a bit of a
    stick in the mud. If it's a 10 speed Shimano drive train, I like to
    use a 10 speed Shimano chain. Similarly with Campy. No mixing and
    matching. However the bike came supplied with the Connex chain.

    Maybe I'm fussing about nothing here and the cause is elsewhere.

    Steve Karpik

  2. Steve Karpik said:

    I rider that I coach crashed yesterday in a race on an uphill. She was
    standing and shifted to a harder gear on the rear derailleur.
    Something didn't work with the shift, it jammed or slipped and she lost
    her balance and crashed.

    I'm trying to sort out the obvious causes. It's a 10 speed Campy drive
    train with a Connex chain on a Cervelo 2.5 Chorus with FSA carbon
    cranks. Any idea whether these chains are prone to problems (missed or
    bad shifts under pressure)? I suppose it could be a derailleur
    adustment problem or chain stretching for that matter.

    Wait wait wait... before anything else, you can help settle a recent
    controversy the use of this term here: what exactly to you mean by
    "chain stretching"? Please be as specific as possible.

    As to your problem:
    1. I've never heard of particular problems with the Connex chain but
    others here would know better. They are not as popular as SRAM or S or
    C. I doubt though the problem is with the chain, unless there was a
    stiff link.
    2. Shifting to a smaller rear cog while standing and pedalling hard
    going uphill is a tough test. Perhaps too tough. Question: did it jam
    or did it slip? There is quite a difference and this might help the
    diagnosis. If it jammed, between what and what?

  3. 41 said:
    Steve Karpik said:

    I rider that I coach crashed yesterday in a race on an uphill. She was
    standing and shifted to a harder gear on the rear derailleur.
    Something didn't work with the shift, it jammed or slipped and she lost
    her balance and crashed.

    I'm trying to sort out the obvious causes. It's a 10 speed Campy drive
    train with a Connex chain on a Cervelo 2.5 Chorus with FSA carbon
    cranks. Any idea whether these chains are prone to problems (missed or
    bad shifts under pressure)? I suppose it could be a derailleur
    adustment problem or chain stretching for that matter.

    Wait wait wait... before anything else, you can help settle a recent
    controversy the use of this term here: what exactly to y ou mean by
    "chain stretching"? Please be as specific as possible.

    Just to explain a little more: the controversy was not over chain
    stretch, rather about what people who are experienced in cycling yet
    new to this group mean when they say "chain stretch". More than a
    little convoluted, true, but surprise surprise, the exchange got
    heated.

    Back to your problem. Sorry about the crash and hope it wasn't too bad.
    If the chain had jammed you would have seen it and known it, so I
    surmise it slipped. Then this is just a missed shift. So, why? Could be
    out of adjustment but a better guess might be insufficient lubrication
    at the BB cable guides:

    <http://www.sheldonbrown.com/autoshift.html>

  4. Steve Karpik said:

    I rider that I coach crashed yesterday in a race on an uphill. She was
    standing and shifted to a harder gear on the rear derailleur.
    Something didn't work with the shift, it jammed or slipped and she lost
    her balance and crashed.

    I'm trying to sort out the obvious causes.

    I would look to see what the causes were. Chain separated?, link
    damage?

    Doubt it was der adjust since she was going away from the wheel when
    shifting. I suspect a damaged chain somehow, perhaps a link problem
    which prevented the chain from going thru the rear der, pulling it
    backwards, stopping wheel-crash.

    Most of the chain issues we see are from poor installation.

    It's a 10 speed Campy drive

    Quoted message said:

    train with a Connex chain on a Cervelo 2.5 Chorus with FSA carbon
    cranks. Any idea whether these chains are prone to problems (missed or
    bad shifts under pressure)? I suppose it could be a derailleur
    adustment problem or chain stretching for that matter. But I'd just
    like to get people's thoughts on this chain. I tend to be a bit of a
    stick in the mud. If it's a 10 speed Shimano drive train, I like to
    use a 10 speed Shimano chain. Similarly with Campy. No mixing and
    matching. However the bike came supplied with the Connex chain.

    Maybe I'm fussing about nothing here and the cause is elsewhere.

    Steve Karpik

  5. Quoted message said:
    Steve Karpik said:

    I rider that I coach crashed yesterday in a race on an uphill. She was
    standing and shifted to a harder gear on the rear derailleur.
    Something didn't work with the shift, it jammed or slipped and she lost
    her balance and crashed.

    I'm trying to sort out the obvious causes.

    The Connex link MUST be installed the right way around. Looking at the
    drive side of the bike (from the right), when the snap link is on the
    top horizontal length of chain, the cutout should look heart
    shaped..i.e, the cut out starts at the top, lowers towards the centre,
    and then rises again to the top.

    YOU MUST FIT IT THE RIGHT WAY AROUND

    --
    Mark
    ______________________________________
    Nerves of Steel, Heart of Gold, Knob of Butter

  6. "MSA" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Steve Karpik said:

    I rider that I coach crashed yesterday in a race on an uphill. She was
    standing and shifted to a harder gear on the rear derailleur.
    Something didn't work with the shift, it jammed or slipped and she lost
    her balance and crashed.

    I'm trying to sort out the obvious causes.

    The Connex link MUST be installed the right way around. Looking at the
    drive side of the bike (from the right), when the snap link is on the top
    horizontal length of chain, the cutout should look heart shaped..i.e, the
    cut out starts at the top, lowers towards the centre, and then rises again
    to the top.

    YOU MUST FIT IT THE RIGHT WAY AROUND

    --
    Mark
    ______________________________________
    Nerves of Steel, Heart of Gold, Knob of Butter


    Hey Mark, I've never heard that. I've been using Wipperman and Campy
    chains with the connex link for years and have never heard this. I will go
    home tonight and check both bikes....see if I notice any difference.

    John

    ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
    http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
    ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

  7. John said:


    "MSA" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    The Connex link MUST be installed the right way around. Looking at the
    drive side of the bike (from the right), when the snap link is on the top
    horizontal length of chain, the cutout should look heart shaped..i.e, the
    cut out starts at the top, lowers towards the centre, and then rises again
    to the top.

    YOU MUST FIT IT THE RIGHT WAY AROUND

    Quoted message said:

    Hey Mark, I've never heard that. I've been using Wipperman and Campy
    chains with the connex link for years and have never heard this. I will go
    home tonight and check both bikes....see if I notice any difference.

    The orientation is also described in the little instruction sheet that
    comes with Connex chains (maybe with the link too).

    JT

    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

  8. Mark Conyer said:
    Quoted message said:

    I rider that I coach crashed yesterday in a race on an uphill. She
    was standing and shifted to a harder gear on the rear derailleur.
    Something didn't work with the shift, it jammed or slipped and she
    lost her balance and crashed.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm trying to sort out the obvious causes.

    For that, I believe knowing what occurred is important. Did the chain
    skip into free-wheeling or did it jam, and if it jammed, what unjammed
    it. We have insufficient information to draw reasonable conclusions.

    Quoted message said:

    The Connex link MUST be installed the right way around. Looking at
    the drive side of the bike (from the right), when the snap link is
    on the top horizontal length of chain, the cutout should look heart
    shaped..i.e, the cut out starts at the top, lowers towards the
    centre, and then rises again to the top.

    Quoted message said:

    YOU MUST FIT IT THE RIGHT WAY AROUND

    Could you explain what effect the orientation of the master link has?
    If the link can be installed in the wrong orientation, it will be
    incorrect as often as not. Can you cite an admonition to that effect
    in the Wipperman installation instructions?

    http://tinyurl.com/crb2e

    I have a hard time with absolute statements to which I can find no
    logical supporting evidence. They sound like religious dogma.

    Jobst Brandt

  9. What happens if fitted with the heart "upside down"? I checked my two
    bikes with Connex links and I see one is right side up and the other
    upside down. I never noticed any difference in how they rode or
    shifted.

  10. Eagle Jackson said:

    What happens if fitted with the heart "upside down"? I checked my two
    bikes with Connex links and I see one is right side up and the other
    upside down. I never noticed any difference in how they rode or
    shifted.

    Supposedly it doesn't work so well on very small cogs.

    JT

    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

  11. I have noticed that the connex links have to be installed int he
    correct orientation or they do cause some skipping. Predominantly on
    the smaller cogs, 11t-13t's.. Larger ones didn't seem to affect it. I
    mistakenly did one wrong on my own bike and it was painfully obvious in
    the stand that it just didn't fly, so I flipped it, and life was good.
    There is anotherh problem with them, but it is mostly on the shimano
    ones.. They seem to have a propensity to break.. a run of chains with
    weakend/weak side plates got made, and the link pins pull through. not
    cool. warranty them out though..

  12. I have noticed that the connex links have to be installed int he
    correct orientation or they do cause some skipping. Predominantly on
    the smaller cogs, 11t-13t's.. Larger ones didn't seem to affect it. I
    mistakenly did one wrong on my own bike and it was painfully obvious in
    the stand that it just didn't fly, so I flipped it, and life was good.
    There is anotherh problem with them, but it is mostly on the shimano
    ones.. They seem to have a propensity to break.. a run of chains with
    weakend/weak side plates got made, and the link pins pull through. not
    cool. warranty them out though..

  13. I have noticed that the connex links have to be installed int he
    correct orientation or they do cause some skipping. Predominantly on
    the smaller cogs, 11t-13t's.. Larger ones didn't seem to affect it. I
    mistakenly did one wrong on my own bike and it was painfully obvious in
    the stand that it just didn't fly, so I flipped it, and life was good.
    There is anotherh problem with them, but it is mostly on the shimano
    ones.. They seem to have a propensity to break.. a run of chains with
    weakend/weak side plates got made, and the link pins pull through. not
    cool. warranty them out though..

  14. John Forrest Tomlinson said:
    Quoted message said:

    What happens if fitted with the heart "upside down"? I checked my
    two bikes with Connex links and I see one is right side up and the
    other upside down. I never noticed any difference in how they rode
    or shifted.

    Quoted message said:

    Supposedly it doesn't work so well on very small cogs.

    Don't do that! What do you mean by "supposedly" and how is that
    caused. This is not religion class. We can't rely on the
    infallibility of the Pope here. "Let's get to the facks ma'am, just
    the facks", as Sgt. Friday would say.

    Jobst Brandt

  15. someone said:

    I have noticed that the connex links have to be installed in the
    correct orientation or they do cause some skipping. Predominantly
    on the smaller cogs, 11t-13t's.. Larger ones didn't seem to affect
    it. I mistakenly did one wrong on my own bike and it was painfully
    obvious in the stand that it just didn't fly, so I flipped it, and
    life was good.

    Quoted message said:

    There is another problem with them, but it is mostly on the Shimano
    ones.. They seem to have a propensity to break.. a run of chains
    with weakened/weak side plates got made, and the link pins pull
    through. Not cool. Warranty them out though.

    This is a far more serious matter than cost. It's safety. When a
    chain beaks in a standing sprint the rider generally flies over the
    bars. This is why you shouldn't sprint in top gear on SA-AW
    three-speed hubs. They reliably pop into neutral under load and speed
    due to a basic design problem for which they should be taken to court
    for damages. A known chain link flaw such as what you mention is
    likewise a major hazard.

    Jobst Brandt

  16. Quoted message said:
    John Forrest Tomlinson said:
    Quoted message said:

    What happens if fitted with the heart "upside down"? I checked my
    two bikes with Connex links and I see one is right side up and the
    other upside down. I never noticed any difference in how they rode
    or shifted.

    Quoted message said:

    Supposedly it doesn't work so well on very small cogs.

    Don't do that! What do you mean by "supposedly" and how is that
    caused. This is not religion class. We can't rely on the
    infallibility of the Pope here. "Let's get to the facks ma'am, just
    the facks", as Sgt. Friday would say.

    "God you're an ass."

    -- Me

  17. Quoted message said:
    someone said:

    I have noticed that the connex links have to be installed in the
    correct orientation or they do cause some skipping. Predominantly
    on the smaller cogs, 11t-13t's.. Larger ones didn't seem to affect
    it. I mistakenly did one wrong on my own bike and it was painfully
    obvious in the stand that it just didn't fly, so I flipped it, and
    life was good.

    Quoted message said:

    There is another problem with them, but it is mostly on the Shimano
    ones.. They seem to have a propensity to break.. a run of chains
    with weakened/weak side plates got made, and the link pins pull
    through. Not cool. Warranty them out though.

    This is a far more serious matter than cost. It's safety. When a
    chain beaks in a standing sprint the rider generally flies over the
    bars. This is why you shouldn't sprint in top gear on SA-AW
    three-speed hubs. They reliably pop into neutral under load and speed
    due to a basic design problem for which they should be taken to court
    for damages.

    wow, and to think that all those years i had one growing up, and all
    those times i'd sprint to the end of the road against my friends, i
    never ever had it pop out of gear. not even once. was mine the
    defective one if this was otherwise a "reliable" occurance?

    Quoted message said:

    A known chain link flaw such as what you mention is
    likewise a major hazard.

    Jobst Brandt

  18. Quoted message said:
    John Forrest Tomlinson said:
    Quoted message said:

    What happens if fitted with the heart "upside down"? I checked my
    two bikes with Connex links and I see one is right side up and the
    other upside down. I never noticed any difference in how they rode
    or shifted.

    Quoted message said:

    Supposedly it doesn't work so well on very small cogs.

    Don't do that! What do you mean by "supposedly" and how is that
    caused. This is not religion class. We can't rely on the
    infallibility of the Pope here. "Let's get to the facks ma'am, just
    the facks", as Sgt. Friday would say.

    The outside curve of the link is not symmetric. See
    http://www.connexchain.com/

    Lou
    --
    Posted by news://news.nb.nu

  19. On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 02:45:23 GMT, [email hidden]

    Quoted message said:
    John Forrest Tomlinson said:
    Quoted message said:

    What happens if fitted with the heart "upside down"? I checked my
    two bikes with Connex links and I see one is right side up and the
    other upside down. I never noticed any difference in how they rode
    or shifted.

    Quoted message said:

    Supposedly it doesn't work so well on very small cogs.

    Don't do that! What do you mean by "supposedly" and how is that
    caused. This is not religion class. We can't rely on the
    infallibility of the Pope here. "Let's get to the facks ma'am, just
    the facks", as Sgt. Friday would say.

    OK, I'll be more specific. On my bike they make a clicking noise in
    the 12. What this means in performance I don't know -- I blindly
    followed the printed instructions not to use it that way after
    noticing that problem. Oopps, I don't mean problem since I have no
    proof it was a problem. Call it a phenomenom observed by me.

    Those instructions seemed to correspond in some way to my experience,
    but my experience didn't prove anything. Oops, I shouldn't have said
    "seemed" -- please strike that from the recond. Since I don't have an
    engineering degree and have not run double-blind tests, I'll try to
    refrain from putting in any heresay in this group (though Brandt did
    ask if the manafacturer gave any info on this, so I guess heresay is
    acceptable in those circumstances.)

    But I will refrain. Heresay is not aceptable obviously. Thank you for
    keeping us so clear.

    Please accept my sincere apologies.

    JT

    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

  20. <snipped>

    Quoted message said:

    OK, I'll be more specific. On my bike they make a clicking noise in
    the 12. What this means in performance I don't know -- I blindly
    followed the printed instructions not to use it that way after
    noticing that problem. Oopps, I don't mean problem since I have no
    proof it was a problem. Call it a phenomenom observed by me.

    Those instructions seemed to correspond in some way to my experience,
    but my experience didn't prove anything. Oops, I shouldn't have said
    "seemed" -- please strike that from the recond. Since I don't have an
    engineering degree and have not run double-blind tests, I'll try to
    refrain from putting in any heresay in this group (though Brandt did
    ask if the manafacturer gave any info on this, so I guess heresay is
    acceptable in those circumstances.)

    But I will refrain. Heresay is not aceptable obviously. Thank you for
    keeping us so clear.

    Please accept my sincere apologies.

    JT


    John,

    The "stanfordalumni" part should tell you everything.

    John

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.