Is it really worth spending a small fortune on high-end, exotic chain materials like titanium nitride or tungsten carbide on a gravel bike, or are riders just getting caught up in the hype and overlooking the fact that a good quality steel chain is more than adequate for all but the most extreme conditions?
Are the supposed benefits of these premium materials - such as reduced weight and increased durability - actually noticeable in real-world riding, and do they outweigh the drawbacks of a higher price point and potentially reduced compatibility with certain drivetrain components?
Or are gravel riders simply trying to keep up with the latest and greatest trends from the road bike world, where a bunch of fragile, lightweight climbers are the primary target market for these super-high-tech chain materials?
Wouldnt it be more practical to stick with tried and true steel chains from reputable manufacturers, which have proven themselves to be robust, reliable, and affordable over countless miles of mixed-surface riding?