City bikes with suspensions might seem like a solution, but does that really address the core issue of urban cycling? If the goal is to navigate chaos, shouldn't we be focusing on sturdiness and reliability instead of adding unnecessary weight?
Mountain bikes have proven their capability in diverse environments, so why are city bikes still struggling to establish themselves as a reliable option? Is it possible that the design philosophy behind city bikes is fundamentally flawed?
Moreover, if mountain bikes can adapt to urban settings without sacrificing their ruggedness, what does that say about the inherent limitations of city bikes? Are we clinging to the notion of city bikes being the ideal urban solution simply because they fit a certain aesthetic?
Ultimately, can we really justify city bikes as a practical choice when they appear to be more about style than substance? What does this mean for the future of urban commuting?
Mountain bikes have proven their capability in diverse environments, so why are city bikes still struggling to establish themselves as a reliable option? Is it possible that the design philosophy behind city bikes is fundamentally flawed?
Moreover, if mountain bikes can adapt to urban settings without sacrificing their ruggedness, what does that say about the inherent limitations of city bikes? Are we clinging to the notion of city bikes being the ideal urban solution simply because they fit a certain aesthetic?
Ultimately, can we really justify city bikes as a practical choice when they appear to be more about style than substance? What does this mean for the future of urban commuting?
