Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Compact crank arm length

Started by cycledogg · · Last activity · 7 posts · 633 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
11 October 2006
Last activity
12 October 2006
Original author
cycledogg
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
633
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hello,
    I am considering switching to a compact crank. I am now using a 172.5
    crank arm length. If I go to the compact crank would a longer arm (175)
    be the thing to do or just keep the same length that I am used to?
    Cheers
    Rick in Tennessee

  2. cycledogg said:

    Hello,
    I am considering switching to a compact crank. I am now using a 172.5
    crank arm length. If I go to the compact crank would a longer arm (175)
    be the thing to do or just keep the same length that I am used to?

    No reason to get a different crank arm length unless you want to, and
    certainly I don't see a reason for a longer arm length, since you have the
    option of somewhat lower gears with the compact crank.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | Arguing with an engineer is like mud wrestling with a pig... You
    _`\(,_ | soon find out the pig likes it!
    (_)/ (_) |

  3. "cycledogg" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:1160583053.351840.109890
    @h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

    Quoted message said:

    I am considering switching to a compact crank. I am now using a 172.5
    crank arm length. If I go to the compact crank would a longer arm (175)
    be the thing to do or just keep the same length that I am used to?

    If anything, I would think about getting shorter crankarms since a compact
    crank has smaller gears and you can spin more. Of course, your leg length
    (which you did not mention) should be the primary factor in chosing crank arm
    length.

  4. sally said:

    If anything, I would think about getting shorter crankarms since a compact
    crank has smaller gears and you can spin more. Of course, your leg length
    (which you did not mention) should be the primary factor in chosing crank arm
    length.

    And ground clearance, particularly if you are considering a fixed-gear.

    --

    John ([email hidden])

  5. On 10/11/2006 9:10 AM cycledogg said:

    Hello,
    I am considering switching to a compact crank. I am now using a 172.5
    crank arm length. If I go to the compact crank would a longer arm (175)
    be the thing to do or just keep the same length that I am used to?
    Cheers
    Rick in Tennessee

    I'm fairly short and can be pretty cranky. I'll check with my tailor for
    arm length.

    -- mike elliott

  6. cycledogg said:

    Hello,
    I am considering switching to a compact crank. I am now using a 172.5
    crank arm length. If I go to the compact crank would a longer arm (175)
    be the thing to do or just keep the same length that I am used to?
    Cheers
    Rick in Tennessee

    Same length..

  7. "Qui si parla Campagnolo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    cycledogg said:

    Hello,
    I am considering switching to a compact crank. I am now using a


    172.5

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    crank arm length. If I go to the compact crank would a longer arm


    (175)

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    be the thing to do or just keep the same length that I am used to?
    Cheers
    Rick in Tennessee

    Same length..

    cycledogg,

    Consider this, changing to shoes with thicker or thinner soles or cleats
    can introduce more of a change than 2.5mm (.100 - less than 1/8"😉 crank
    length difference.

    In my experience, 160mm or 180mm can make a noticeable change over
    170mm - 10mm (0.394mm or more than 3/8"😉.

    I used to ride 180mm cranks on my climbing and mountain bikes. It seemed
    like 180mm gave me a little more leverage when climbing.

    I'm now riding bikes with 170mm, 172.5mm and 175mm cranks because that's
    what on them. I can't tell any difference.

    Chas.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.