UK and Europe · Public discussion

Commonwealth Games

Started by Mark, Devon · · Last activity · 19 posts · 617 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
7 February 2006
Last activity
7 February 2006
Original author
Mark, Devon
Posts
19
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
617
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–19 of 19
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Just 36 days to go before it starts! The British teams have made a lot
    of progress in recent years, and let's hope they all do well in
    Melbourne. Here is the England athletics team:-

    http://www.englandathletics.org/default.asp?page=7C3356243A3F743B5E2D...

    Only 6 years to go the the Olympics in London.....but let's hope we
    have a renewed effort in the UK to encourage all our people to live
    healthier lifestyles and take regular exercise and eat better from 2006

    onwards....i.e NOW!!

    Let's encourage our teenagers to really engage in the Commonwealth
    Games in 36 days time, and let it inspire them to have a good aim in
    life - health and fitness!

  2. Mark said:

    Just 36 days to go before it starts! The British teams have made a lot
    of progress in recent years, and let's hope they all do well in
    Melbourne. Here is the England athletics team:-

    http://www.englandathletics.org/default.asp?page=7C3356243A3F743B5E2D...

    Only 6 years to go the the Olympics in London.....but let's hope we
    have a renewed effort in the UK to encourage all our people to live
    healthier lifestyles and take regular exercise and eat better from 2006

    onwards....i.e NOW!!

    Let's encourage our teenagers to really engage in the Commonwealth
    Games in 36 days time, and let it inspire them to have a good aim in
    life - health and fitness!

    Yer link didn't work. Does it list cyclists too ? If not then why list
    on a recreational cycling newsgroup ? Why list on a recreational
    cyclist newsgroup anyway, this is definately racing.

  3. MSeries said:

    Yer link didn't work. Does it list cyclists too ? If not then why list on
    a recreational cycling newsgroup ? Why list on a recreational cyclist
    newsgroup anyway, this is definately racing.

    No cyclists in the "team" as listed. Curiously the teams for the relay
    races consist of one person each....

    Cycle racing _is_ on-topic for this group though.

    Mike

  4. Mike Causer wrote:
    ..

    Quoted message said:


    Cycle racing _is_ on-topic for this group though.

    Mike

    so why rec ?

  5. MSeries said:

    Mike Causer wrote:
    .

    Quoted message said:

    Cycle racing _is_ on-topic for this group though.

    Mike

    so why rec ?

    Because watching/following/being interested in amateur,
    semi-professional, or professional cycle racing is a recreational activity?

    R.

  6. Richard said:
    MSeries said:

    Mike Causer wrote:
    .

    Quoted message said:

    Cycle racing _is_ on-topic for this group though.

    Mike

    so why rec ?

    Because watching/following/being interested in amateur,
    semi-professional, or professional cycle racing is a recreational activity?

    R.


    isn't that what rec.bicycles.racing is for ?

  7. "MSeries" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Richard said:
    MSeries said:

    Mike Causer wrote:
    .

    >Cycle racing _is_ on-topic for this group though.
    >
    >
    >Mike

    so why rec ?

    Because watching/following/being interested in amateur,
    semi-professional, or professional cycle racing is a recreational
    activity?

    R.


    isn't that what rec.bicycles.racing is for ?

    So why rec?

  8. elyob said:

    "MSeries" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Richard said:

    MSeries wrote:
    > Mike Causer wrote:
    > .
    >
    >>Cycle racing _is_ on-topic for this group though.
    >>
    >>
    >>Mike
    >
    >
    > so why rec ?

    Because watching/following/being interested in amateur,
    semi-professional, or professional cycle racing is a recreational
    activity?

    R.


    isn't that what rec.bicycles.racing is for ?

    So why rec?

    Because watching/following/being interested in amateur,
    semi-professional, or professional cycle racing is a recreational
    activity?

  9. MSeries said:
    Richard said:
    MSeries said:

    Mike Causer wrote:
    .

    >Cycle racing _is_ on-topic for this group though.

    so why rec ?

    Because watching/following/being interested in amateur,
    semi-professional, or professional cycle racing is a recreational activity?

    isn't that what rec.bicycles.racing is for ?

    uk.* and rec.* are unrelated hierarchies. UK Usenet traditionally makes
    no reference to the existence of groups in other hierarchies; if it's on
    topic in a uk.* group, then it doesn't matter whether it's also on topic
    for another group outside of uk.*

    --
    Keith Willoughby http://flat222.org/keith/
    "When you come to a fork in the road, take it."
    - Yogi Berra

  10. quote='MSeries'elyob said:

    "MSeries" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Richard said:

    MSeries wrote:
    > Mike Causer wrote:
    > .
    >
    >>Cycle racing _is_ on-topic for this group though.
    >>
    >>
    >>Mike
    >
    >
    > so why rec ?

    Because watching/following/being interested in amateur,
    semi-professional, or professional cycle racing is a recreational
    activity?

    R.


    isn't that what rec.bicycles.racing is for ?

    So why rec?

    Because watching/following/being interested in amateur,
    semi-professional, or professional cycle racing is a recreational
    activity?[/QUOTE]

    No i think in this case rec stands for recursive :-)

    Bryan

  11. "Bryan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    MSeries said:
    elyob said:

    "MSeries" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    >
    > Richard wrote:
    >> MSeries wrote:
    >> > Mike Causer wrote:
    >> > .
    >> >
    >> >>Cycle racing _is_ on-topic for this group though.
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> >>Mike
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > so why rec ?
    >>
    >> Because watching/following/being interested in amateur,
    >> semi-professional, or professional cycle racing is a recreational
    >> activity?
    >>
    >> R.
    > isn't that what rec.bicycles.racing is for ?
    >

    So why rec?

    Because watching/following/being interested in amateur,
    semi-professional, or professional cycle racing is a recreational
    activity?

    No i think in this case rec stands for recursive :-)

    Bryan

    --
    Bryan

    No i think in this case rec stands for recursive

  12. "POHB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Bryan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    MSeries said:

    elyob wrote:
    > "MSeries" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > news:[email hidden]...
    > >
    > > Richard wrote:
    > >> MSeries wrote:
    > >> > Mike Causer wrote:
    > >> > .
    > >> >
    > >> >>Cycle racing _is_ on-topic for this group though.
    > >> >>
    > >> >>
    > >> >>Mike
    > >> >
    > >> >
    > >> > so why rec ?
    > >>
    > >> Because watching/following/being interested in amateur,
    > >> semi-professional, or professional cycle racing is a recreational
    > >> activity?
    > >>
    > >> R.
    > > isn't that what rec.bicycles.racing is for ?
    > >
    >
    > So why rec?

    Because watching/following/being interested in amateur,
    semi-professional, or professional cycle racing is a recreational
    activity?

    No i think in this case rec stands for recursive :-)

    Bryan

    --
    Bryan

    No i think in this case rec stands for recursive

    No i think in this case rec stands for recursive

  13. "POHB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "POHB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Bryan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    MSeries Wrote:
    > elyob wrote:
    > > "MSeries" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email hidden]...
    > > >
    > > > Richard wrote:
    > > >> MSeries wrote:
    > > >> > Mike Causer wrote:
    > > >> > .
    > > >> >
    > > >> >>Cycle racing _is_ on-topic for this group though.
    > > >> >>
    > > >> >>
    > > >> >>Mike
    > > >> >
    > > >> >
    > > >> > so why rec ?
    > > >>
    > > >> Because watching/following/being interested in amateur,
    > > >> semi-professional, or professional cycle racing is a recreational
    > > >> activity?
    > > >>
    > > >> R.
    > > > isn't that what rec.bicycles.racing is for ?
    > > >
    > >
    > > So why rec?
    >
    > Because watching/following/being interested in amateur,
    > semi-professional, or professional cycle racing is a recreational
    > activity?

    No i think in this case rec stands for recursive :-)

    Bryan

    --
    Bryan

    No i think in this case rec stands for recursive

    No i think in this case rec stands for recursive

    So why rec?

  14. Mike Causer said:
    MSeries said:

    Yer link didn't work. Does it list cyclists too ? If not then why list on
    a recreational cycling newsgroup ? Why list on a recreational cyclist
    newsgroup anyway, this is definately racing.

    No cyclists in the "team" as listed. Curiously the teams for the relay
    races consist of one person each....

    Cycle racing _is_ on-topic for this group though.

    And so is transport cycling, although the group happens to be within
    the uk.rec namespace. In theory we could create uk.transport.cycling
    and crosspost lots but, as numerous posters have said in the past,
    there's not a lot of point.

  15. elyob said:

    "POHB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "POHB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Bryan" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...
    >
    > MSeries Wrote:
    >> elyob wrote:
    >>> "MSeries" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >>> news:[email hidden]...
    >>>>
    >>>> Richard wrote:
    >>>>> MSeries wrote:
    >>>>>> Mike Causer wrote:
    >>>>>> .
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Cycle racing _is_ on-topic for this group though.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Mike
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> so why rec ?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Because watching/following/being interested in amateur,
    >>>>> semi-professional, or professional cycle racing is a
    >>>>> recreational activity?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> R.
    >>>> isn't that what rec.bicycles.racing is for ?
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> So why rec?
    >>
    >> Because watching/following/being interested in amateur,
    >> semi-professional, or professional cycle racing is a recreational
    >> activity?
    >
    > No i think in this case rec stands for recursive :-)
    >
    > Bryan
    >
    >
    > --
    > Bryan
    >

    No i think in this case rec stands for recursive

    No i think in this case rec stands for recursive

    So why rec?

    Because watching/following/being interested in amateur, semi-professional,
    or professional cycle racing is a recreational activity?

  16. in message <[email hidden]>, Mark,

    Devon (') said:

    Just 36 days to go before it starts! The British teams have made a lot
    of progress in recent years, and let's hope they all do well in
    Melbourne. Here is the England athletics team:-

    http://www.englandathletics.org/default.asp?page=7C3356243A3F743B5E2D...

    My club has one member at the games and another who only just missed the
    cut:
    <URL:http://www.stewartry-wheelers.org/wheelers/story/article_64.html>

    Yup, we're proud of him.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
    ;; If God does not write LISP, God writes some code so similar to
    ;; LISP as to make no difference.

  17. in message <[email hidden]>,

    MSeries (') said:
    Mark said:

    Just 36 days to go before it starts! The British teams have made a lot
    of progress in recent years, and let's hope they all do well in
    Melbourne. Here is the England athletics team:-


    http://www.englandathletics.org/default.asp?page=7C3356243A3F743B5E2D...

    Quoted message said:


    Yer link didn't work. Does it list cyclists too ? If not then why list
    on a recreational cycling newsgroup ? Why list on a recreational
    cyclist newsgroup anyway, this is definately racing.

    Most of the competitors at the Commonwealth Games are amateurs, doing
    their sport for recreation. Plenty of people on this group compete at
    one level or another for recreation. Cycle sport in Britain is
    overwhelmingly a recreational activity - the number of pros is tiny.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; ... exposing the violence incoherent in the system...

  18. in message <[email hidden]>, Richard

    (') said:
    MSeries said:
    Mike Causer said:

    Cycle racing _is_ on-topic for this group though.

    so why rec ?

    Because watching/following/being interested in amateur,
    semi-professional, or professional cycle racing is a recreational
    activity?

    And /taking/ /part/ in amateur competition (which is 99% of all cycle
    competition in Britain) is a recreational activity.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    -- mens vacua in medio vacuo --

  19. Quoted message said:

    And /taking/ /part/ in amateur competition (which is 99% of all cycle
    competition in Britain) is a recreational activity.

    There seems something wrong with describing a time trialler on the point of
    death, with lungs bursting and eyes popping out, as a 'recreational' rider
    :-)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.