General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

coca cola

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 22 posts · 1,424 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
6 July 2005
Last activity
12 July 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,424
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–22 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Bob (this one)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Frankly, it's not worth going through a multi-part, purple-prosefest
    to isolate the obviously absurd parts. It's a garbled piece,
    alternately dealing with historical fact then raging and ranting about
    deleterious effects that may or may not actually be the case. He
    quotes a whole lot of people, virtually all "alternative" types, most
    of whom take shots at Coke. Fine, for a polemic. Just not much science
    in there.

    Why do you even bother to banter with him. He spends his days and nights
    looking for articles that stress his views. Sad to say, and as we have
    all noted, very little science and all opinion. When one does show him a
    science paper that disputes any of his views, he discards them as
    Corporate shills on the take. When one thinks like that, how can they
    ever be wrong?

    Understand, he is right and the world is wrong.

    -DF

  2. Doug Freese said:

    "Bob (this one)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Frankly, it's not worth going through a multi-part, purple-prosefest
    to isolate the obviously absurd parts. It's a garbled piece,
    alternately dealing with historical fact then raging and ranting about
    deleterious effects that may or may not actually be the case. He
    quotes a whole lot of people, virtually all "alternative" types, most
    of whom take shots at Coke. Fine, for a polemic. Just not much science
    in there.

    Why do you even bother to banter with him. He spends his days and nights
    looking for articles that stress his views. Sad to say, and as we have
    all noted, very little science and all opinion. When one does show him a
    science paper that disputes any of his views, he discards them as
    Corporate shills on the take. When one thinks like that, how can they
    ever be wrong?

    Understand, he is right and the world is wrong.

    -DF

    You guys are jokes, the both of you. You insist that I am wrong but
    can't be bothered to actually show anything to support it. Continually.

    Put up or shut the f**k up, [censored].

    TC

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.