Ian Smith <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:Tom Sherman said:
Ian Smith said:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 01:57:27 -0500, Tom Sherman <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> At a traffic light controlled intersection, pedestrians certainly do not have the
> right-of-way when they are crossing the street on a "DON'T WALK" signal.
You should qualify your statement - they do in the UK (the sign is an illuminated red man),
though most motorists are oblivious of teh fact. In essence, the same laws govern all
pedestrian crossings, and a pedestrian on a crossing has priority over traffic on the road....
The UK law is more ridiculous than Tony Blair's foreign policy, then. What is the point of
having green traffic lights for traffic and red lights for pedestrians if they do not
necessarily indicate who has the right-of-way?
There's no concept of right of way in UK traffic law, I believe. In certain circumstances one or
other person or vehicle has priority, but you never get an automatic right to bulldoze whjatever
is in your way.
However, I see no problem with making cars (which are noisy, smelly, dangerous and generally
unpleasant) subservient to pedestrians in all circumstances.
regards, Ian SMith
Ian, I am going to take a shot at this, but my UK'isms may be a bit wonky and IANAL, so please bear
with me. In the US to the best of my knowledge there is no intrinsic right to to simply run down a
pedestrian , jump out of/off of your vehicle (car or bike), scream "You dented my fender you lousy
bugger, you'll hear from my solicitor!", and drive off. Right-of-way implies that you had the right
to travel that direction at that time while taking all precautions. If someone intereferes with this
you still must make an effort to avoid the accident, but if you can't you may or may not be charged
with a crime. This means that if you are driving a car along a street, and a small child runs out
between two parked cars and you slam on your brakes, but strike the child, you probably will not be
charged with a criminal offense. If the child runs out between the parked cars, and you step on the
accelerator and strike the child, the best barrister(SP?) in the world probably can't help much. To
the best of my knowledge that simply applies to criminal charges, not civil charges, which can be
levied at almost any time, by anyone, for any reason. For some people in the U.S. frivilous lawsuits
are a hobby.
Thanks Bryan