From todays' Sun.
The words "bottom" and "barrel" spring to mind here:
http://www.swldxer.co.uk/zsun5.htm
--
Simon Mason
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
UK and Europe · Public discussion
Thread navigation
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
From todays' Sun.
The words "bottom" and "barrel" spring to mind here:
http://www.swldxer.co.uk/zsun5.htm
--
Simon Mason
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net
"Simon Mason" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:From todays' Sun.
The words "bottom" and "barrel" spring to mind here:
I was thinking more along the lines of 'moronic [censored]' ;-)
"wafflycat" <w*a*ff£y£cat*@£btco*nn£ect.com> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Simon Mason" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:From todays' Sun.
The words "bottom" and "barrel" spring to mind here:
I was thinking more along the lines of 'moronic [censored]' ;-)
There is that too, although I was thinking more about the ludicrous reasons
these people come up with. Not getting a boyfriend due to sweaty arms pits
is as laughable as Nigel Havers saying that aluminium cycle frames made in
China use vast amounts of energy and are destroying the planet. Clutching at
straws as they find fewer reasons to have a go at us.
Although one or two of them have started to turn, there was this guy last
week -
http://www.swldxer.co.uk/zmos2.htm
and now WVM friend Jon Gaunt of TawkSpawt has taken to cycling to and from
work to Euston and has publicly apologised on the radio to all of the
cyclists he's slagged off in the past. Look forward to his column on Tuesday
to see if he backs it up in print ;-)
--
Simon Mason
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net
--
Simon Mason
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net
Simon Mason said:Not getting a boyfriend due to sweaty arms pits
is as laughable as Nigel Havers saying that aluminium cycle frames made in
China use vast amounts of energy and are destroying the planet.
Not getting a boyfriend is, quite frankly, something that would never
have discouraged me.
--
Danny Colyer <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
"He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine
"wafflycat" <w*a*ff£y£cat*@£btco*nn£ect.com> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Simon Mason" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:From todays' Sun.
The words "bottom" and "barrel" spring to mind here:
I was thinking more along the lines of 'moronic [censored]' ;-)
I prefer the idea of simply referring to anyone who shows signs of 'moronic
wankership' as 'a bit of a Clarkson'. Of course, you really have to go some
to be 'a complete Clarkson' - someone like the judge in the Cadden case.
"Simon Mason" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:From todays' Sun.
The words "bottom" and "barrel" spring to mind here:http://www.swldxer.co.uk/zsun5.htm
--
Simon Mason
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net
Someone`s found his `natural` level then ?
Colin N.
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>
Simon Mason said:From todays' Sun.
The words "bottom" and "barrel" spring to mind here:
I don't see why people get so annoyed by Clarkson - it's the people who
think he's being serious that we should be worried about.
Surely nobody on the planet takes Jeremy Clarkson seriously?
in message <[email hidden]>, Rob Morley
(') said:In article <[email hidden]>
Simon Mason said:From todays' Sun.
The words "bottom" and "barrel" spring to mind here:
I don't see why people get so annoyed by Clarkson - it's the people who
think he's being serious that we should be worried about.
That's what's scary. He does mean it. If challenged he would claim he's
being 'post-modern' and 'ironic', but he's not - he's a hate-filled
sociopathic paranoid piece of [censored], and he really means it.
--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
"The result is a language that... not even its mother could
love. Like the camel, Common Lisp is a horse designed by
committee. Camels do have their uses."
;; Scott Fahlman, 7 March 1995
Danny Colyer wrote on 09/09/2006 13:39 +0100:
Quoted message said:
Not getting a boyfriend is, quite frankly, something that would never
have discouraged me.
It obviously left deep scars in the Wooly W***er's psyche though which
is maybe why he has devoted the rest of his life to his penis extensions.
--
Tony
"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci
matagi wrote on 09/09/2006 14:07 +0100:
Quoted message said:Surely nobody on the planet takes Jeremy Clarkson seriously?
And the BBC have stated officially that they don't either.
--
Tony
"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci
Exactly. The sun readers who then somehow feel "justified by clarkson" to
injure some of us.
John Clayton
www.calder-clarion.co.uk
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:
I don't see why people get so annoyed by Clarkson - it's the people who
think he's being serious that we should be worried about.
In article <[email hidden]>
Simon Brooke said:in message <[email hidden]>, Rob Morley
(') said:In article <[email hidden]>
Simon Mason said:From todays' Sun.
The words "bottom" and "barrel" spring to mind here:
I don't see why people get so annoyed by Clarkson - it's the people who
think he's being serious that we should be worried about.That's what's scary. He does mean it.
Do you have anything to support this claim?
Quoted message said:If challenged he would claim he's
being 'post-modern' and 'ironic', but he's not - he's a hate-filled
sociopathic paranoid piece of [censored], and he really means it.
You reckon?
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 12:58:53 +0100, Simon Mason wrote
(in article <[email hidden]>😉:
Quoted message said:
JC (Jeremy Clarkson that is) is such a dull columnist quite aside from any
issues relating to cycling. His attempts at humour are so feable 🙁
--
Patrick
My bikes: Moulton AM7 and two Moulton APBs - an R18 and a "mongrel"
Pic of R18: <http://patrickjames.mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/R18.jpg>
A few paragraphs about the Scottoiler chain lubrication system:
<http://patrickjames.mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/scottoiler.html>
Simon Brooke wrote on 09/09/2006 15:59 +0100:
Quoted message said:
That's what's scary. He does mean it. If challenged he would claim he's
being 'post-modern' and 'ironic', but he's not - he's a hate-filled
sociopathic paranoid piece of [censored], and he really means it.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/5235334.stm
--
Tony
"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
- Leonardo da Vinci
in message <[email hidden]>, Rob Morley
(') said:In article <[email hidden]>
Simon Brooke said:in message <[email hidden]>, Rob Morley
(') said:In article <[email hidden]>
Simon Mason <[email hidden]> wrote:
> From todays' Sun.
> The words "bottom" and "barrel" spring to mind here:
>
> http://www.swldxer.co.uk/zsun5.htm
>
I don't see why people get so annoyed by Clarkson - it's the people
who think he's being serious that we should be worried about.That's what's scary. He does mean it.
Do you have anything to support this claim?
No. Oi veels it in moi waaaters. Just listen to the man, for heaven's sake.
That is one very sick puppy; he could (and some day probably will) keep
forensic psychiatry in business for years. He isn't 'funny' or 'clever';
he's sick, nasty and dangerous.
--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
;; Let's have a moment of silence for all those Americans who are stuck
;; in traffic on their way to the gym to ride the stationary bicycle.
;; Rep. Earl Blumenauer (Dem, OR)
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 08:24:20 +0100, Tony Raven wrote
(in article <[email hidden]>😉:
Quoted message said:Simon Brooke wrote on 09/09/2006 15:59 +0100:
Quoted message said:
That's what's scary. He does mean it. If challenged he would claim he's
being 'post-modern' and 'ironic', but he's not - he's a hate-filled
sociopathic paranoid piece of [censored], and he really means it.
I feel the truth about Jeremy Clarkson is that he just has very little talent
so he makes up for it by attempting to be a bit shocking and by these means
he remains in the public eye.
--
Patrick
My bikes: Moulton AM7 and two Moulton APBs - an R18 and a "mongrel"
Pic of R18: <http://patrickjames.mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/R18.jpg>
A few paragraphs about the Scottoiler chain lubrication system:
<http://patrickjames.mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/scottoiler.html>
In article <[email hidden]>
Simon Brooke said:in message <[email hidden]>, Rob Morley
(') said:In article <[email hidden]>
Simon Brooke said:in message <[email hidden]>, Rob Morley
([email hidden]'😉 wrote:
<snip>
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> I don't see why people get so annoyed by Clarkson - it's the people
> who think he's being serious that we should be worried about.That's what's scary. He does mean it.
Do you have anything to support this claim?
No. Oi veels it in moi waaaters. Just listen to the man, for heaven's sake.
That is one very sick puppy; he could (and some day probably will) keep
forensic psychiatry in business for years. He isn't 'funny' or 'clever';
he's sick, nasty and dangerous.
So what do you think of Chris Morris?
in message <[email hidden]>, Rob Morley
(') said:In article <[email hidden]>
Simon Brooke said:in message <[email hidden]>, Rob Morley
(') said:In article <[email hidden]>
Simon Brooke <[email hidden]> wrote:
> in message <[email hidden]>, Rob
> Morley ([email hidden]'😉 wrote:
<snip>Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> > I don't see why people get so annoyed by Clarkson - it's the people
> > who think he's being serious that we should be worried about.
>
> That's what's scary. He does mean it.Do you have anything to support this claim?
No. Oi veels it in moi waaaters. Just listen to the man, for heaven's
sake. That is one very sick puppy; he could (and some day probably will)
keep forensic psychiatry in business for years. He isn't 'funny' or
'clever'; he's sick, nasty and dangerous.
So what do you think of Chris Morris?
Who?
--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
Das Internet is nicht fuer gefingerclicken und giffengrabben... Ist
nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen. Das mausklicken sichtseeren
keepen das bandwit-spewin hans in das pockets muss; relaxen und
watchen das cursorblinken. -- quoted from the jargon file
In article <[email hidden]>
Simon Brooke said:in message <[email hidden]>, Rob Morley
(') said:In article <[email hidden]>
Simon Brooke said:in message <[email hidden]>, Rob Morley
([email hidden]'😉 wrote:
> In article <[email hidden]>
> Simon Brooke <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> in message <[email hidden]>, Rob
>> Morley ([email hidden]'😉 wrote:
<snip>Quoted message said:>> > I don't see why people get so annoyed by Clarkson - it's the people
>> > who think he's being serious that we should be worried about.
>>
>> That's what's scary. He does mean it.
>
> Do you have anything to support this claim?No. Oi veels it in moi waaaters. Just listen to the man, for heaven's
sake. That is one very sick puppy; he could (and some day probably will)
keep forensic psychiatry in business for years. He isn't 'funny' or
'clever'; he's sick, nasty and dangerous.
So what do you think of Chris Morris?Who?
http://www.google.com/search?q=chris-morris+brass-eye
You're not really up to speed on controversial comedy, are you?
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.