General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Clarification reqested on grading meat

Started by Kswck · · Last activity · 118 posts · 2,503 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
21 July 2005
Last activity
26 July 2005
Original author
Kswck
Posts
118
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,503
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–60 of 118
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. (Curly Sue) said:

    be a boor. RFC is a cooking group Bob, not your personal platform
    for vendettas.

    So can you explain to me why you don't tell Sheldon off for his racist
    comments, his sexist rants, his hostile (sometimes threatening) posts to
    people he doesn't like? I just want to know why you're chewing out Bob
    for not being on-topic but not saying anything to Sheldon.

    Quoted message said:

    Please adjust your meds. Grow up. Or get a life. Whichever applies.

    Again, please explain to me why this isn't directed at Sheldon. I'm
    seriously confused.

    Stacia

  2. (Curly Sue) said:

    I did not complain about Sheldon being a target of anything. The
    issue is Bob's post

    Then killfile Bob. Or killfile the entire thread. What you read on
    Usenet is your responsibility, so take control of your newsreader
    instead of trying to control people.

    Stacia

  3. Curly Sue said:

    Please adjust your meds. Grow up. Or get a life. Whichever applies.

    Sue(tm)
    Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself!

    Looks like good advice for you to follow. Sheldon is gets what Sheldon
    deserves - a healthy dose of [censored].

    jim

  4. Curly Sue wrote:
    \

    Quoted message said:


    But we don't. That's the point. This is not rec.BobvSheldon!

    Sue(tm)
    Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself!

    Nor is it rec.curly.sue.

    jim

  5. "aem" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Or switch the debate to Mandarin, where there is one "we" that means
    "all of us" and another that means "me and him but not you". -aem

    We could also just leave it in American English, but switch to
    Southern mode, where we'd also have to choice of "y'all"
    and "all y'all"....:-)

    Bob M.

  6. "Glitter Ninja" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    (Curly Sue) said:

    be a boor. RFC is a cooking group Bob, not your personal platform
    for vendettas.

    So can you explain to me why you don't tell Sheldon off for his racist
    comments, his sexist rants, his hostile (sometimes threatening) posts to
    people he doesn't like? I just want to know why you're chewing out Bob
    for not being on-topic but not saying anything to Sheldon.

    Might be for the same reason I don't say anything to Sheldon;
    he's one of the few people I've ever killfiled, so I never see his
    drivel. On the other hand, Bob seems to be a pretty nice guy,
    all around (as all people named Bob are...:-)), and I didn't see
    Sue as "chewing out" Bob, just noting that it probably isn't very
    productive (or particularly enjoyable for the rest of us) to try
    to bait him like this. It's like Robert Heinlein (I believe...and
    see - another Bob, continuing to verify the All-Around-Good-
    Person theory) once said: Never wrassle a pig. All you're
    gonna do is get dirty, and the pig enjoys it.

    Bob M.

  7. Bob Myers said:


    "Glitter Ninja" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    (Curly Sue) said:

    be a boor. RFC is a cooking group Bob, not your personal platform
    for vendettas.

    So can you explain to me why you don't tell Sheldon off for his racist
    comments, his sexist rants, his hostile (sometimes threatening) posts to
    people he doesn't like? I just want to know why you're chewing out Bob
    for not being on-topic but not saying anything to Sheldon.

    Might be for the same reason I don't say anything to Sheldon;
    he's one of the few people I've ever killfiled, so I never see his
    drivel. On the other hand, Bob seems to be a pretty nice guy,
    all around (as all people named Bob are...:-)), and I didn't see
    Sue as "chewing out" Bob, just noting that it probably isn't very
    productive (or particularly enjoyable for the rest of us) to try
    to bait him like this. It's like Robert Heinlein (I believe...and
    see - another Bob, continuing to verify the All-Around-Good-
    Person theory) once said: Never wrassle a pig. All you're
    gonna do is get dirty, and the pig enjoys it.

    Bob M.

    "Thank you for your support" 🙂
    (Bartles and Jaymes)

    Sue(tm)
    Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself!

  8. Glitter Ninja said:

    Again, please explain to me why this isn't directed at Sheldon. I'm
    seriously confused.

    Me too.

  9. "Bob Myers" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "aem" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Or switch the debate to Mandarin, where there is one "we" that means
    "all of us" and another that means "me and him but not you". -aem

    We could also just leave it in American English, but switch to
    Southern mode, where we'd also have to choice of "y'all"
    and "all y'all"....:-)

    Bob M.


    Funny, I've never heard anyone say "all y'all" which is simply redundent.
    If there is only one person being spoken to, it's assumed it means "you".
    If it's a group, it's all of you, unless someone adds "except you, Bubba" 😉

    Jill

  10. "JimLane" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:


    Sheldon is gets what Sheldon deserves - a healthy dose of [censored].

    I bet he is laughing his ass off reading the 40 posts (so far) that have so
    many people riled up and he said nothing in the thread.

  11. jmcquown said:

    "Bob Myers" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "aem" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Or switch the debate to Mandarin, where there is one "we" that means
    "all of us" and another that means "me and him but not you". -aem

    We could also just leave it in American English, but switch to
    Southern mode, where we'd also have to choice of "y'all"
    and "all y'all"....:-)

    Bob M.

    Funny, I've never heard anyone say "all y'all" which is simply redundent.
    If there is only one person being spoken to, it's assumed it means "you".
    If it's a group, it's all of you, unless someone adds "except you, Bubba" 😉

    Jill

    i say "all y'all". but I'm not southern, so I guess that doesn't count 🙂

    --

    saerah

    "It's not a gimmick, it's an incentive."- asterbark, afca

    aware of the manifold possibilities of the future

    "I think there's a clause in the Shaman's and Jujumen's Local #57 Union
    contract that they have to have reciprocity for each other's shop rules."
    -König Prüß

  12. "sarah bennett" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    jmcquown said:

    "Bob Myers" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "aem" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    >Or switch the debate to Mandarin, where there is one "we" that means
    >"all of us" and another that means "me and him but not you". -aem

    We could also just leave it in American English, but switch to
    Southern mode, where we'd also have to choice of "y'all"
    and "all y'all"....:-)

    Bob M.

    Funny, I've never heard anyone say "all y'all" which is simply


    redundent.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    If there is only one person being spoken to, it's assumed it means


    "you".

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    If it's a group, it's all of you, unless someone adds "except you,


    Bubba" 😉

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Jill

    i say "all y'all". but I'm not southern, so I guess that doesn't count 🙂
    --
    saerah


    Technically speaking, I'm not southern either, I've just lived here a long
    time 🙂

    OB Food: Leftover pan-fried fish fillet (yes, the orange roughy I never
    intended to buy) and steamed lima beans. Just a splash of lemon juice and
    grated black pepper added to the beans and a little lemon juice on the fish.

    Jill

  13. On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 21:39:58 GMT, [email hidden] (Curly

    Sue) said:

    On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:03:55 -0400, "Bob (this one)" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Curly Sue said:

    "Bob (this one)" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >Chung crossposted to this group and all the others he could find to
    >which I've ever posted with the very specific intention of creating the
    >very opinion you carry; to embarrass me and to create negative feelings.
    >He, apparently accurately, surmised it would finally reflect badly on me
    >and some people here would blame me for his actions. It seems to have
    >stuck with you. Looks like another blind spot.
    >
    >There's always the killfile.
    >
    >Pastorio

    I know!!!! Why don't you use one???

    Touche... good riposte.

    Except I'm not the one having all this gastric distress. All these
    off-topic posts... whatever has this group come to?

    But you are indeed the one with the agita. Obviously Sheldon gets to
    you in a serious way. If you put him in your killfile or ignore his
    posts, the problem goes away on so many levels.

    Sue(tm)
    Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself!


    Exactly what statement did Bob make about Sheldon that was not the
    truth?

  14. jmcquown said:

    "Bob Myers" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "aem" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Or switch the debate to Mandarin, where there is one "we" that means
    "all of us" and another that means "me and him but not you". -aem

    We could also just leave it in American English, but switch to
    Southern mode, where we'd also have to choice of "y'all"
    and "all y'all"....:-)

    Bob M.


    Funny, I've never heard anyone say "all y'all" which is simply redundent.

    It's part of an email joke that's taken on a life of it's own.


  15. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    We could also just leave it in American English, but switch to
    Southern mode, where we'd also have to choice of "y'all"
    and "all y'all"....:-)

    Bob M.


    Funny, I've never heard anyone say "all y'all" which is simply


    redundent.

    Quoted message said:


    It's part of an email joke that's taken on a life of it's own.


    -----

    I heard a basic training Drill Sergant at Ft. Benning G.A. say " All y'all
    mens (sic) go over yonder except y'all". The distinction between the two
    groups was indicated with a pointed finger and hand wave. I understood the
    message loud and clear...1965 was not going to be my best year.

    Hubert

  16. "jmcquown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Funny, I've never heard anyone say "all y'all" which is simply redundent.
    If there is only one person being spoken to, it's assumed it means "you".
    If it's a group, it's all of you, unless someone adds "except you, Bubba"


    😉

    Well, Jill, I've only heard it when visiting the in-laws in the Great
    Republic of Texas...which I guess is sort of the South, but is really
    more of a completely separate country (not to mention state of
    mind)...

    Bob M.

  17. Allan Matthews said:

    On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 21:39:58 GMT, [email hidden] (Curly

    Sue) said:

    On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:03:55 -0400, "Bob (this one)" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Curly Sue wrote:

    >"Bob (this one)" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    >
    >>Chung crossposted to this group and all the others he could find to
    >>which I've ever posted with the very specific intention of creating the
    >>very opinion you carry; to embarrass me and to create negative feelings.
    >>He, apparently accurately, surmised it would finally reflect badly on me
    >>and some people here would blame me for his actions. It seems to have
    >>stuck with you. Looks like another blind spot.
    >>
    >>There's always the killfile.
    >>
    >>Pastorio
    >
    >I know!!!! Why don't you use one???

    Touche... good riposte.

    Except I'm not the one having all this gastric distress. All these
    off-topic posts... whatever has this group come to?

    But you are indeed the one with the agita.

    Oh, Sue, it's *acido* as in acid as in indigestion - gastric distress,
    you know. Although I'm sure you'll find something wrong in how I've said
    that, too.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Obviously Sheldon gets to
    you in a serious way. If you put him in your killfile or ignore his
    posts, the problem goes away on so many levels.

    But it looks like *you* have the biggest problem with it. And here's a
    good question to finish your next post...

    Quoted message said:

    Exactly what statement did Bob make about Sheldon that was not the
    truth?

    Heeeeeeerrreeeeee's Susie...

    Pastorio

  18. On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:43:43 -0400, "Bob (this one)" <"Bob

    @nospam.com said:
    Allan Matthews said:

    On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 21:39:58 GMT, [email hidden] (Curly

    Sue) said:

    On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:03:55 -0400, "Bob (this one)" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >Curly Sue wrote:
    >
    >>"Bob (this one)" <[email hidden]> wrote:


    <snip>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>There's always the killfile.
    >>>
    >>>Pastorio
    >>
    >>I know!!!! Why don't you use one???
    >
    >Touche... good riposte.
    >
    >Except I'm not the one having all this gastric distress. All these
    >off-topic posts... whatever has this group come to?

    But you are indeed the one with the agita.

    Oh, Sue, it's *acido* as in acid as in indigestion - gastric distress,
    you know. Although I'm sure you'll find something wrong in how I've said
    that, too.

    Oh Bob, you make it so easy by taking a cheap shot at what you
    consider to be an error... and you're so wrong! You could have done a
    web search on "agita" first, just to be sure. In that case you would
    have found this on the website Medterms

    http://tinyurl.com/by7pg

    Definition of Agita:
    Agita: Heartburn, acid indigestion, an upset stomach or, by extension,
    a general feeling of upset. The word is Italian-American slang derived
    from the Italian "agitare" meaning "to agitate."

    Agitare Bob, not acido. With your superior Italian-American creds,
    what should have given you some pause was the the final "a" on agita,
    but your ego ran over that clue.

    I'll end this post on that note.

    Sue(tm)
    Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself!

  19. On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:47:17 GMT, [email hidden] (Curly

    Sue) said:

    On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 00:43:43 -0400, "Bob (this one)" <"Bob

    @nospam.com said:
    Allan Matthews said:

    On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 21:39:58 GMT, [email hidden] (Curly
    Sue) wrote:

    >On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:03:55 -0400, "Bob (this one)" <[email hidden]>
    >wrote:
    >
    >
    >>Curly Sue wrote:
    >>
    >>>"Bob (this one)" <[email hidden]> wrote:


    <snip>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>>There's always the killfile.
    >>>>
    >>>>Pastorio
    >>>
    >>>I know!!!! Why don't you use one???
    >>
    >>Touche... good riposte.
    >>
    >>Except I'm not the one having all this gastric distress. All these
    >>off-topic posts... whatever has this group come to?
    >
    >But you are indeed the one with the agita.

    Oh, Sue, it's *acido* as in acid as in indigestion - gastric distress,
    you know. Although I'm sure you'll find something wrong in how I've said
    that, too.

    Oh Bob, you make it so easy by taking a cheap shot at what you
    consider to be an error... and you're so wrong! You could have done a
    web search on "agita" first, just to be sure. In that case you would
    have found this on the website Medterms

    http://tinyurl.com/by7pg

    Definition of Agita:
    Agita: Heartburn, acid indigestion, an upset stomach or, by extension,
    a general feeling of upset. The word is Italian-American slang derived
    from the Italian "agitare" meaning "to agitate."

    Agitare Bob, not acido. With your superior Italian-American creds,
    what should have given you some pause was the the final "a" on agita,
    but your ego ran over that clue.

    I'll end this post on that note.

    Sue(tm)
    Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself!


    Curly Sue

    Really wish you would have answered my question.
    Allan

  20. Allan Matthews said:

    Exactly what statement did Bob make about Sheldon that was not the
    truth?

    Allan, here's your answer: It doesn't matter. My first post on this
    issue explains the issue.

    Sue(tm)
    Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.