Warren said:
"Badger South" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Incidently, not sure why, or if it helps me or what, b/c I've never been
trained even -near- that of a pro athlete. I'm strictly middle of the
pack,
Quoted message said:body builder type, but my Hct is typically about 49-51%. I give blood now
and then to try and reduce my iron load (men get this b/c they don't
menstruate), which is now thought to be a problem for some. I'm not
dehydrated at all, and have no earthly idea why my hct would be so high.
It's not abnormal. If you trained really hard (in an endurance sport like
cycling) it's likely that your hct would be lower as as result.
-WG
Maybe we shall see. I found the readings...
Date Hct (%) Training intensity
1980 - 48.8 above avg - (swim-bike-run, weight train, fight (40miles/wk
running, 20-30/wk in prev 3 years)
1990 - 47.5 moderate - (run, weight train 20 mile/wk running)
2000 - 43.6 low (didn't train at all from 1994 to 1999)
2000-02 ? low (trail biking intermittently <10 mi/wk)
2003 -04 ? moderate - (100-150mi/week bike. No running, mod weight
training as maintenence.)
Hmmm, though the trend seems to be lower hct, it's in inverse proportion to
intensity and endurance ability. Probably some other effect at work than
your comment, b/c you are correct in theory.
I'll get one next week, and again in summer, 2005. Dunno if I'm able to
train endurance 'hard' at 50, but I'm trying. I'm in the piedmont, so not
'altitude', though I got apparent, and noticeable improvement running in Va
Beach. Probably just wishful thinking, though, b/c my best 10K and 13.1
mile time there is best; mostly due to the flat. I did some training on
Skyline drive, though, lol, weekend athlete tries to copy the pros, back in
the 80s <g>
-B