Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Ciclosport's CicloRDS - Radar Distance System

Started by pysays · · Last activity · 7 posts · 1,821 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
18 September 2003
Last activity
24 September 2003
Original author
pysays
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,821
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Has anyone dared to try such a gadget? What do you think would be the greatest advantage compared to the ordinary cyclocomputer? There must be some downsides, too. Battery consumption is definately one concern. Not to mention bulkiness and weight. Though for my taste it's small enough, certainly light enough.

    More information on http://www.ciclosport.de.

  2. I might be missing something here, but what does it do? I can't find anything specific on the web site that mentions what it can do ..

    That cycle navigation computer on the site looks pretty snazzy though 🙂

  3. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by rek
    I might be missing something here, but what does it do? I can't find anything specific on the web site that mentions what it can do ..

    That cycle navigation computer on the site looks pretty snazzy though 🙂

    I had difficulties finding specs from the manufacturer's site; CicloRDS falls under the category 'Multifunctional'. Firstly, I found it by accident from a German webstore:

    http://www.sportuhren-discount.de/ciclosport/ciclords.htm

    Nashbar sells a slightly different model, with pretty much the same features:

    http://www.nashbar.com/profile.cfm?category=82&subcategory=1035&brand=&sku=9280&storetype=&estoreid=

    Funnily enough, these two webstores offer more specific description of the technology/product than the manufacturer.

  4. What do you think would be the greatest advantage compared to the ordinary cyclocomputer? There must be some downsides, too. Battery consumption is definately one concern. Not to mention bulkiness and weight. Though for my taste it's small enough, certainly light enough.

    More information on http://www.ciclosport.de. [/QUOTE]

    Probably something that would appeal more to runners, triathletes and adventure racers ?

    Leon

  5. Quoted post said:


    Probably something that would appeal more to runners, triathletes and adventure racers ?

    Leon

    Probably so. Wouldn't buy one without more specific information about bike mount, ease of use etc. There aren't probably too many reviews out there concerning RDS devices.

  6. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Leon
    What do you think would be the greatest advantage compared to the ordinary cyclocomputer? There must be some downsides, too. Battery consumption is definately one concern. Not to mention bulkiness and weight. Though for my taste it's small enough, certainly light enough.

    More information on http://www.ciclosport.de.

    Probably something that would appeal more to runners, triathletes and adventure racers ?

    Leon [/QUOTE]

    My guess would be that the advantage would be versatility. It appears to not use the typical sensors of a regular cyclometer which makes it usable for just about any sport. The lack of sensors would also be the downfall. It would not provide some of the cycling specific information such as cadence that you would get from a cyclocomputer. I'm pretty new to cycling though so I could be off.

  7. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by mfallon

    My guess would be that the advantage would be versatility. It appears to not use the typical sensors of a regular cyclometer which makes it usable for just about any sport. The lack of sensors would also be the downfall. It would not provide some of the cycling specific information such as cadence that you would get from a cyclocomputer. I'm pretty new to cycling though so I could be off.

    That's quite right. CicloRDS lacks sensors; in cycling the greatest advantage just might be the hassle-free mounting. If I remember right, the device shouldn't be exposed to water continuously, so it might suit better for duathlon rather than triathlon. I do just cycling, and would like to hear from anyone who has experience using devices like this one.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.