On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:35:37 -0000, "Alan Law"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
[...]
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Osprey Luna rucksack
Anquet GB North
Merino wool baselayer (260g)
Tilley hat
MSR titanium mug
DNT membership
Quoted message said:Martin Richardson recently referred to the drift towards uk.rec.shopping. Of
the items listed above, only DNT membership does not fall into the shopping
category (and let me give credit to Peter Clinch for pointing out that this
might be a good way of spending money).
Shopping item? We wear and carry 'shopping items' into the hills with
us each time we go out. Everything is a 'shopping item' unless we're
able to make it ourselves, so I'm not entirely sure what you mean by
the term.
The tone of your posting suggests to me that you mean 'frivolous
item', but there's nothing frivolous about choosing a rucksack for a
14 day trip, or a mapping product to help plan a safe, 200 mile route
across unfamiliar country. Nor is it frivolous to want to wear an
efficient base layer in order to stay warm and as dry as possible when
winter backpacking in all conditions. Am I missing something there?
Tilley hats and MSR titanium mugs aren't in the same sort of category,
although it does seem from recent postings that a surprising number of
people here have forked out quite a lot of cash for a Tilley and
consider it one of the best things they've ever bought. Then again,
it's almost Christmas, and at Christmas many of us hope that our
families might get us something which relates to our hobbies, rather
than something we're never going to use.
Quoted message said:
Almost all mountain activities are now tainted by status and fashion.
Yours, maybe, but my choices of walking and camping kit are tainted by
neither. I'm still happily using no-name items of dubious and
sometimes embarrassing appearance that I've been using for years
because they work for me, but at the same time I'm not embarrassed to
say that there's an expensive, 'big name' piece of kit on my wish list
if it's something I feel will do the job for me. That sort of 'chippy'
thinking is very debilitating, imo, and an ill-humoured waste of time
and energy.
Quoted message said:Commercial interests are trying to convince us that we need all sorts of
fancy things
Well I won't disagree with that, but in the context of the thread I'm
not sure how it's relevant.
Quoted message said:And we are becoming shopping addicts. Hill-walking and
mountaineering used to be accomplished wearing old clothes---how times have
changed.
You feel there's some sort of special virtue in walking in old
clothes? I tend to judge walking clothes on their merits, and wear
them if they do the job. It's not a fashion contest in my eyes, and at
the same time I don't see it as an opportunity to drag out my 20 year
old Hellys and poke a bit of fun with my mates at the people who've
only got into it more recently, and have to wear tacky newer clothing.
How about you?
Quoted message said:
I conclude that fell-running is about the last refuge for those who want to
escape consumerism.
Why am I not surprised to read that that's where you're coming from? I
do a bit of fell running too. Is that ok? I wasn't born to it like
some people were, but I get off my backside and have a go and I don't
sit and snigger at the people who come in behind me in new clothing.
Again, how about you?
Quoted message said:It costs about £55 for a pair of shoes. Pretty well
everything else is impedimenta. Minimalism is everything---there are no
status symbols.
Well, great! That's nice.
Tell me again how it was relevant?
Best wishes,
--
,,
(**)PeeWiglet~~
/ \ / \