Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Chorus or Centaur

Started by Wm · · Last activity · 25 posts · 1,626 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
25 September 2003
Last activity
7 October 2003
Original author
Wm
Posts
25
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,626
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–25 of 25
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. [email hidden] (Gene) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (Qui si parla Campagnolo) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Antti-<< Centaur has a cheap bottom bracket which supposedly isn't as durable as the Chorus
    bottom bracket. >><BR><BR>

    'Supposedly' is right, more misinformation about Campagnolo. We install dozens and do not have a
    problem with these(AC-H) BBs.....

    The Chorus BB is not so durable in the first place. Mine failed at three years ( ~5000 miles ).
    Campy BB's do not have such a good reputation. As noted in an old(-er) posting (different thread),
    for a few $$ more a Phil Wood is a great option.

    But I've been using the same Chorus bottom bracket since 1998. Somewhere between 10,000 and 15,000
    total miles on it. And its still working. The Chorus bottom bracket sells for about $45. A fairly
    good value. Not sure why someone would feel the need to spend $100 to $150 for a Phil Wood bottom
    bracket, the cups, and installation tool.

  2. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Wm
    Okay Campy experts, what is the perceptible difference between the chorus and centaur groups? Apart
    from a few grammes in weight, they are both high-quality all-aluminium 10-speed groups (yes I know
    the 2004 chorus has some carbon options). Is it a reasonable option for a non-professional rider to
    go for the centaur and spend the exra on something else (wheels, whatever)?

    I really can't tell you the difference regarding quality, but when I was shopping around, I found a chorus/campy value at gvhbikes. I looked hard for best value, and was looking for Veloce, but this seemed the very best value. You might want to check it out. Good luck.

  3. [email hidden] (Gene) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (Qui si parla Campagnolo) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Antti-<< Centaur has a cheap bottom bracket which supposedly isn't as durable as the Chorus
    bottom bracket. >><BR><BR>

    'Supposedly' is right, more misinformation about Campagnolo. We install dozens and do not have a
    problem with these(AC-H) BBs.....

    The Chorus BB is not so durable in the first place. Mine failed at three years ( ~5000 miles ).
    Campy BB's do not have such a good reputation. As noted in an old(-er) posting (different thread),
    for a few $$ more a Phil Wood is a great option.

    For a few dollars more?! Try three times the cost. I have gotten 12,000 miles so far out of my
    Chorus BB and it shows no sign of quitting. So if I get only 15,000 miles out of this BB, and more
    likely 20,000, and replace the sealed bearings *only* when it is time, I can probably get 50 -
    75,000 miles out of it before it craps out for some other reason for less than half the cost of a
    Phil. Not knocking the Phil,I'm sure they're great, but they sure are spendy.

    I will comment negatively, however, on the Campy Chorus HS. Poorly sealed at best, and as such,
    needs frequent re-packing (read 2-3 times per season + every time I get caught in the rain). When
    set up properly and with fresh grease, it's great. Problem is those conditions exist for about 10%
    of my riding.

    App

  4. In article said:


    I will comment negatively, however, on the Campy Chorus HS. Poorly sealed at best, and as such,
    needs frequent re-packing (read 2-3 times per season + every time I get caught in the rain). When
    set up properly and with fresh grease, it's great. Problem is those conditions exist for about 10%
    of my riding.

    Use a boot.

  5. [email hidden] (Qui si parla Campagnolo) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Antti-<< Centaur has a cheap bottom bracket which supposedly isn't as durable as the Chorus bottom
    bracket. >><BR><BR>

    'Supposedly' is right, more misinformation about Campagnolo. We install dozens and do not have a
    problem with these(AC-H) BBs.....

    I had one that suddenly "gave up". It was a Daytona from fall '99, so it must have been one of the
    first produced. It lasted 2 winters of use (not abuse!)before it had to be replaced.

    Quoted message said:


    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.