Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Cheap cadence computer for trainer

Started by DaveB · · Last activity · 11 posts · 645 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
24 October 2006
Last activity
26 October 2006
Original author
DaveB
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
645
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've got a dedicated [censored] bike for the trainer and want a computer to
    measure cadence on it. But of course all the computers I see with
    cadence are a bit expensive considering I only want one function.

    So I was thinking of getting a cheap Huffy computer that does speed,
    putting the spoke magnet on a crank, and the sensor on the frame
    somewhere. Then running the cable up the downtube and as far along the
    top tube as it will go. If the computer itself doesn't reach the bars it
    doesn't matter, this bike will never leave the shed.

    Then I configure the "wheel distance" to something that will give a
    quickly recognisable value related to cadence (this is the bit I need to
    give some more thought to). maybe I'll need a chart in front of the bike
    that says xxkmh = yy rpm.

    So what do people think? Anyone done anything similar?

    Dave"cheapskate"B

  2. I know this isn't really your question...but you could buy an entry level cadence computer on eBay...like a Cateye Astrale 8 (which go for about $50 brand new in box). There's a heap for sale at the moment.

    If the Huffy computer costs you $25(?)...then you add the parts and the effort to rig up a home-made cadence magnet...surely is worth another $25 to you for a reliable result?

  3. DaveB said:

    I've got a dedicated [censored] bike for the trainer and want a computer to
    measure cadence on it. But of course all the computers I see with
    cadence are a bit expensive considering I only want one function.

    So I was thinking of getting a cheap Huffy computer that does speed,
    putting the spoke magnet on a crank, and the sensor on the frame
    somewhere. Then running the cable up the downtube and as far along the
    top tube as it will go. If the computer itself doesn't reach the bars it
    doesn't matter, this bike will never leave the shed.

    Then I configure the "wheel distance" to something that will give a
    quickly recognisable value related to cadence (this is the bit I need to
    give some more thought to). maybe I'll need a chart in front of the bike
    that says xxkmh = yy rpm.

    So what do people think? Anyone done anything similar?

    Dave"cheapskate"B


    gday dave,
    bikepro in surrey hills were selling the sigma bc1600 with cadence
    pretty cheap a while ago..not sure if they still have them though?
    also i recently got a vetta rt77 from probike which has cadence etc (i
    think it was $40) ?
    the vetta quite simply is junk, but it'd do the job..

  4. In aus.bicycle on Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:20:42 +1000

    DaveB said:


    Then I configure the "wheel distance" to something that will give a
    quickly recognisable value related to cadence (this is the bit I need to
    give some more thought to). maybe I'll need a chart in front of the bike
    that says xxkmh = yy rpm.

    So what do people think? Anyone done anything similar?

    I know someone who did it to measure RPM on their motorcycle...
    Measured revs on the flywheel.

    So yeah, can be done.

    Zebee

  5. "DaveB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I've got a dedicated [censored] bike for the trainer and want a computer to
    measure cadence on it. But of course all the computers I see with cadence
    are a bit expensive considering I only want one function.

    Depends what you consider cheap. I use an Echowell Echo-F2 which can be had
    for around $60.00 and usually comes with a long lead to reach the rear
    wheel.
    eg http://www.deanwoods.com.au/store/prod450.htm
    Another one around that money is the Topeak Comp 140.
    eg http://www.moruyabicycles.com.au/contents/en-uk/d31.html#p2100

    --
    www.ozcableguy.com
    www.oztechnologies.com

  6. On 2006-10-24, dej (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:


    DaveB said:

    I've got a dedicated [censored] bike for the trainer and want a computer to
    measure cadence on it. But of course all the computers I see with
    cadence are a bit expensive considering I only want one function.

    So I was thinking of getting a cheap Huffy computer that does speed,

    Eg., the $23 jobbie I found from goldcross during one of their regular
    sales?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    putting the spoke magnet on a crank, and the sensor on the frame
    somewhere. Then running the cable up the downtube and as far along the
    top tube as it will go. If the computer itself doesn't reach the bars it
    doesn't matter, this bike will never leave the shed.

    Then I configure the "wheel distance" to something that will give a
    quickly recognisable value related to cadence (this is the bit I need to
    give some more thought to). maybe I'll need a chart in front of the bike
    that says xxkmh = yy rpm.

    Recall you can set the wheel circumference to some distance in
    millimetres? So a 700C tire comes pretty darned close to 2000mm?

    I haven't tested this, but the equations seem to call (and I'm not
    going to show my working, because my working is dodgy 🙂 for this
    distance to be set to 16667mm to give an exact rpm figure when looking
    at the km/h display of the speedo.

    Since it is most likely that your computer will not be able to accept
    a fake wheel of this size (a 200inch wheel???), you'll have to bring
    that down to 1667mm -- ie, a 20inch wheel -- that's not overly unusual
    now, is it?

    OK, so when you are pedalling at 90rpm, the display will read 9.0km/h,
    ie, a factor of 10 out -- nice and easy when you are doing 104% of
    your maximum heartrate. Just make sure you don't pedal slower than
    30rpm, when the display reads 3.0km/h, and cuts out 🙂

    Quoted message said:

    bikepro in surrey hills were selling the sigma bc1600 with cadence
    pretty cheap a while ago..not sure if they still have them though?
    also i recently got a vetta rt77 from probike which has cadence etc (i
    think it was $40) ?
    the vetta quite simply is junk, but it'd do the job..

    I got my BC1600 from a bike shop down the bad end of chapel street
    (south), on a perpendicular road just a bit off chapel -- "melbourne
    bicycle store", perhaps? $50-$60. Be careful -- the cadence is only
    an optional accessory -- and some people may well try to sell you one
    without the cadence kit.

    --
    TimC
    Always carry a short length of fibre-optic cable. If you get lost,
    then you can drop it on the ground, wait ten minutes, and ask the
    backhoe operator how to get back to civilization. -- Mike Andrews in NANAE

  7. TimC said:


    Recall you can set the wheel circumference to some distance in
    millimetres? So a 700C tire comes pretty darned close to 2000mm?

    I haven't tested this, but the equations seem to call (and I'm not
    going to show my working, because my working is dodgy 🙂 for this
    distance to be set to 16667mm to give an exact rpm figure when looking
    at the km/h display of the speedo.

    Since it is most likely that your computer will not be able to accept
    a fake wheel of this size (a 200inch wheel???), you'll have to bring
    that down to 1667mm -- ie, a 20inch wheel -- that's not overly unusual
    now, is it?

    On ya Tim, nice to see all that book lernin' doing some good.

    DaveB

  8. TimC said:

    [snip]

    Recall you can set the wheel circumference to some distance in
    millimetres? So a 700C tire comes pretty darned close to 2000mm?

    I haven't tested this, but the equations seem to call (and I'm not
    going to show my working, because my working is dodgy 🙂 for this
    distance to be set to 16667mm to give an exact rpm figure when looking
    at the km/h display of the speedo.

    [snip]
    --
    TimC
    Always carry a short length of fibre-optic cable. If you get lost,
    then you can drop it on the ground, wait ten minutes, and ask the
    backhoe operator how to get back to civilization. -- Mike Andrews in NANAE

    Umm, I think the gearing fits in there somewhere... if you have a fixie or singlespeed, you won't need the cadence kit.

    Ritch

  9. ritcho said:


    Umm, I think the gearing fits in there somewhere...

    No the gearing won't affect it because I'm measuring at the pedal not
    the rear wheel. However, you do raise doubts in my head so even though
    Tim makes sense I'll be interested to see what actually happens when I
    set it up (the Huffy comp comes off the MTB tomorrow night).

    DaveB

  10. quote='DaveB'TimC said:


    Recall you can set the wheel circumference to some distance in
    millimetres? So a 700C tire comes pretty darned close to 2000mm?

    I haven't tested this, but the equations seem to call (and I'm not
    going to show my working, because my working is dodgy 🙂 for this
    distance to be set to 16667mm to give an exact rpm figure when looking
    at the km/h display of the speedo.

    Since it is most likely that your computer will not be able to accept
    a fake wheel of this size (a 200inch wheel???), you'll have to bring
    that down to 1667mm -- ie, a 20inch wheel -- that's not overly unusual
    now, is it?

    On ya Tim, nice to see all that book lernin' doing some good.

    DaveB[/QUOTE]

    Beat me to it. I did the sum a while back for the same reason but never put it into practice

    I was going to use a circumference of 1666.

    At this setting a "speed" of 1.0km/hr represents 10 rpm 8.5 km/hr = 85 rpm ect. (to 1 decimal place)

    I wasn't sure that my computer would accept a 5 figure circumference

    RoryW

  11. TimC said:


    Since it is most likely that your computer will not be able to accept
    a fake wheel of this size (a 200inch wheel???), you'll have to bring
    that down to 1667mm -- ie, a 20inch wheel -- that's not overly unusual
    now, is it?

    OK, so when you are pedalling at 90rpm, the display will read 9.0km/h,
    ie, a factor of 10 out -- nice and easy when you are doing 104% of
    your maximum heartrate. Just make sure you don't pedal slower than
    30rpm, when the display reads 3.0km/h, and cuts out 🙂

    Tim you're a marvel. Just finished setting it up and it's a winner.
    Trickiest part was attaching the spoke magnet to the crank but there's
    nothing you can't fix with gaffa tape and a tube of silicon sealant.
    Total cost = $0 because I had an old computer to reuse.

    DaveB

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.