Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

chainstay length and cornering

Started by John Forrest To · · Last activity · 8 posts · 807 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
21 July 2003
Last activity
1 August 2003
Original author
John Forrest To
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
807
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've got two road racing bikes. On one of them the back of the bike feels like it's going to washout
    when I'm cornering really hard -- I have to consciously sit firmly in the saddle with my weight back
    to feel secure. The other feels more secure when cornering hard whereever I am in the saddle.

    The more secure bike has slightly longer chainstays, and I'm wondering if that helps the feeling of
    security. But the bikes differ in other ways too, so I am not at all sure what the difference is
    (though it's not the wheels/tires -- I share them between bikes).

    Any thought about this? In particular, if all else was equal do longer chainstays get more or less
    weight over the rear wheel?

    JT

  2. On 21 Jul 2003 12:16:14 -0700, [email hidden] (John Forrest Tomlinson) wrote:

    <I've got two road racing bikes. On one of them the back of the bike <feels like it's going to
    washout when I'm cornering really hard -- I <have to consciously sit firmly in the saddle with my
    weight back to <feel secure. The other feels more secure when cornering hard <whereever I am in the
    saddle. < <The more secure bike has slightly longer chainstays, and I'm wondering <if that helps the
    feeling of security. But the bikes differ in other <ways too, so I am not at all sure what the
    difference is (though it's <not the wheels/tires -- I share them between bikes). < <Any thought
    about this? In particular, if all else was equal do longer

    There have been discussions on chain stay length recently, I'd recommend google for that but what I
    though about was your headsets. I've been on badly handling bikes that just needed headset
    adjusttments.

    all the best-c.p.

    <chainstays get more or less weight over the rear wheel? < <JT

  3. All else being equal, longer chainstays remove weight from the rear wheel. Basic physics, center of
    mass, weight distribution. ALL ELSE BEING EQUAL

    " On 21 Jul 2003 12:16:14 -0700, [email hidden] (John Forrest Tomlinson)

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    <chainstays get more or less weight over the rear wheel? < <JT

  4. Doug Huffman:

    Quoted message said:

    All else being equal, longer chainstays remove weight from the rear wheel. Basic physics, center
    of mass, weight distribution. ALL ELSE BEING EQUAL

    How so, and what do you mean by "all else being equal"? Since weight is taken up by the two contact
    patches both wheels have with the ground, what does it matter that the bike has a longer wheelbase?
    The weight distribution is still the same.

  5. Jose Rizal _@_._ said:

    Doug Huffman:

    Quoted message said:

    All else being equal, longer chainstays remove weight from the rear wheel. Basic physics, center
    of mass, weight distribution. ALL ELSE BEING EQUAL


    How so, and what do you mean by "all else being equal"? Since weight is taken up by the two contact
    patches both wheels have with the ground, what does it matter that the bike has a longer wheelbase?
    The weight distribution is still the same.

    Not if that longer wheelbase is achieved by lengthening the chainstays, moving the back wheel out
    from under the rider.

    Consider an extreme case; shorten the chainstays until the seatstays are straight up and down. Now
    _all_ the rider's weight is on the back wheel (which won't turn because it interpenetrates the seat
    tube and downtube, but never mind that. :-)
    --
    David Damerell <[email hidden]> Distortion Field!

  6. Doug Huffman said:


    Quoted message said:

    All else being equal, longer chainstays remove weight from the rear wheel. Basic physics, center
    of mass, weight distribution. ALL ELSE BEING EQUAL

    Jose Rizal said:

    How so, and what do you mean by "all else being equal"? Since weight is taken up by the two
    contact patches both wheels have with the ground, what does it matter that the bike has a longer
    wheelbase? The weight distribution is still the same.

    No, if you extend the chainstays, without moving the center of mass of the bike/rider, the weight
    load on the rear wheel will be lessened, while the weight load on the front will be increased by the
    same amount.

    Sheldon "Old Enough To Have Grown Up With See-Saws" Brown
    +----------------------------------------------------------+
    | When I was in school, I cheated on my metaphysics exam: | I looked into the soul of the boy
    | sitting next to me. | --Woody Allen |
    +----------------------------------------------------------+ Harris Cyclery, West Newton,
    Massachusetts Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041 harriscyclery.comharriscyclery.com Hard-to-find parts
    shipped Worldwide captainbike.comcaptainbike.com sheldonbrown.comsheldonbrown.com

  7. Sheldon Brown said:


    Doug Huffman said:


    Quoted message said:

    All else being equal, longer chainstays remove weight from the rear wheel. Basic physics, center
    of mass, weight distribution. ALL ELSE BEING EQUAL

    Jose Rizal said:

    How so, and what do you mean by "all else being equal"? Since weight is taken up by the two
    contact patches both wheels have with the ground, what does it matter that the bike has a longer
    wheelbase? The weight distribution is still the same.

    No, if you extend the chainstays, without moving the center of mass of the bike/rider, the weight
    load on the rear wheel will be lessened, while the weight load on the front will be increased by
    the same amount.

    Exactly. I suspect the effect is quite minor. But perhaps I should not guess. Naw, finding out
    requires setting up (time) the measuring system and we all know the usenet is not about
    substance anyway.

  8. John Forrest Tomlinson said:

    I've got two road racing bikes. On one of them the back of the bike feels like it's going to
    washout when I'm cornering really hard -- I have to consciously sit firmly in the saddle with
    my weight back to feel secure. The other feels more secure when cornering hard wherever I am in
    the saddle.

    Quoted message said:

    The more secure bike has slightly longer chainstays, and I'm wondering if that helps the feeling
    of security. But the bikes differ in other ways too, so I am not at all sure what the difference
    is (though it's not the wheels/tires -- I share them between bikes).

    Ideally your CG should be between the wheels and if you have ridden a tandem, you will recall that
    long bicycles corner more stably than short ones. However, sitting firmly in the saddle is not the
    ideal way to corner hard, but rather by unloading the saddle and using the legs as shock absorbers
    while maintaining some saddle contact. Sidewalls or cheeks of saddles help in this respect,
    something modern saddles eschew in favor of light weight.

    Get off the saddle! The rougher the pavement the higher you'll need to get.

    Jobst Brandt [email hidden] Palo Alto CA

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.