UK and Europe · Public discussion

Chainset maintenance

Started by Danny Colyer · · Last activity · 11 posts · 449 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
16 March 2005
Last activity
18 March 2005
Original author
Danny Colyer
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
449
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Last weekend I stripped down my bike and gave it a really good clean. I
    went as far as dismantling the chainset, which I'd never done before.

    Since then I've found that a certain technique and a fair amount of luck
    are required in order to shift from the middle ring to the granny. More
    often than not the chain will get stuck between the two rings (if I'm
    lucky I'll then be able to get it back onto the middle ring without
    having to stop).

    It's not a problem with the derailleur limit screws. A close look at
    the shifting shows that, as the chain is pushed off the middle ring, the
    chain bushes line up with the teeth on the granny ring. It appears that
    I may have lined the two rings up incorrectly when I put the chainset
    back together.

    I'm going to have to separate the rings again and screw them back
    together in the correct alignment. Are there any tricks for getting the
    alignment right? It's a Shimano Tiagra chainset.

    --
    Danny Colyer (the UK company has been laughed out of my reply address)
    <URL:http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/danny/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  2. Danny Colyer <[email hidden]> wrote:
    : are required in order to shift from the middle ring to the granny. More
    : often than not the chain will get stuck between the two rings (if I'm

    You've put it together wrong so there's no a bigger gap between the
    two rings.

    Check:

    The rings are the right way round (writing facing the outside)
    The chainring bolts are correctly fastened and tight (allen key bit to the outside)
    The rings are in the right orentation (usually there's a little peg on
    the big ring that goes behind the crankarm. Then align the rest so that
    the writing lines up (ie where is say 22 on one ring aligns with the
    32 on the next)

    Arthur

    --
    Arthur Clune PGP/GPG Key: http://www.clune.org/pubkey.txt
    Don't get me wrong, perl is an OK operating system, but it lacks a
    lightweight scripting language -- Walter Dnes

  3. On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:14:44 +0000, Danny Colyer wrote:

    8<

    Quoted message said:


    I'm going to have to separate the rings again and screw them back
    together in the correct alignment. Are there any tricks for getting the
    alignment right? It's a Shimano Tiagra chainset.

    You can download service instructions from the Shimano website. There is a
    specific way to put chainsets together.
    http://www.shimano-europe.com/cycling/catalogue/content_prodx.phtml?pid=10263&psid=39

    --
    Mike

  4. Arthur Clune said:

    You've put it together wrong so there's no a bigger gap between the
    two rings.

    Check:

    The rings are the right way round (writing facing the outside)
    The chainring bolts are correctly fastened and tight (allen key bit to the outside)
    The rings are in the right orentation (usually there's a little peg on
    the big ring that goes behind the crankarm. Then align the rest so that
    the writing lines up (ie where is say 22 on one ring aligns with the
    32 on the next)

    Thanks Arthur (and David, both replies were very helpful).

    I've had the chainset apart again this evening and I couldn't find *any*
    writing on any of the rings. I found a hole in the big ring (perhaps it
    had a peg in it once), which by chance I had lined up with the crank. I
    found another hole in the middle ring, which I hadn't lined up.

    I then started zooming in on photos that I've taken in the past. I
    can't be certain from the photos, but it appears that I had put the
    outer 2 rings on the right way round and the granny on the wrong way
    round. Each ring has grooves around the outer edge of one side (they
    look similar to the grooves on a record). I had assumed that the
    grooves would go on the crank side of each ring. From the photos, it's
    clear that the grooves on the granny ring should go on the other side,
    but it looks as though they go on the crank side of the outer two rings.
    Doing this does bring the granny ring slightly closer to the middle ring.

    I've put it back together with the holes in the outer two rings lined up
    with the crank. I noticed then that each ring had a tooth lined up
    exactly with the centre of the crank, so I lined up the granny ring to
    also have a tooth lined up exactly with the centre of the crank.

    It's shifting reliably now in the workshop. I'll give it a proper test
    tomorrow.

    --
    Danny Colyer (the UK company has been laughed out of my reply address)
    <URL:http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/danny/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  5. mb said:

    You can download service instructions from the Shimano website. There is a
    specific way to put chainsets together.
    http://www.shimano-europe.com/cycling/catalogue/content_prodx.phtml?pid=10263&psid=39

    Thanks Mike. I wish I'd seen that before I took the chainset apart for
    the second time. It looks as though I may still have the middle ring
    the wrong way round, but I think I'll see how it works over the next
    couple of days before taking it apart for a third time.

    --
    Danny Colyer (the UK company has been laughed out of my reply address)
    <URL:http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/danny/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  6. Arthur Clune said:

    The rings are the right way round (writing facing the outside)

    I've just checked my own recently installed Tiagra triple chainset and
    the etched name and size markings on the middle and inner rings are
    facing inwards, ie readable from the non-drive side of the bike. HTH.

    d.

  7. davek said:

    I've just checked my own recently installed Tiagra triple chainset and
    the etched name and size markings on the middle and inner rings are
    facing inwards, ie readable from the non-drive side of the bike. HTH.

    I assumed the chainset to be Tiagra based on the front mech being
    Tiagra. I'm starting to wonder if the chainset itself is just a cheap
    imitation. The rings look similar to those in the diagrams that Mike
    posted a link to, but there seem to be no name or size markings on any
    of the rings.

    Actually, just had a look at the current Street Machine specs
    <http://www.hpvelotechnik.com/produkte/sm/gt/ausstattung_e.html> and
    although a Tiagra front mech is specified, the chainset specified is
    Tracer. So I guess I've been providing duff information when requesting
    help - sorry. Thanks, though.

    --
    Danny Colyer (the UK company has been laughed out of my reply address)
    <URL:http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/danny/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  8. davek <[email hidden]> wrote:

    : I've just checked my own recently installed Tiagra triple chainset and
    : the etched name and size markings on the middle and inner rings are
    : facing inwards, ie readable from the non-drive side of the bike. HTH.

    Bizarre. I've never ever seen that before

    --
    Arthur Clune PGP/GPG Key: http://www.clune.org/pubkey.txt
    Don't get me wrong, perl is an OK operating system, but it lacks a
    lightweight scripting language -- Walter Dnes

  9. Arthur Clune said:

    Bizarre. I've never ever seen that before

    I presumed it was because they wouldn't be readable from the drive
    side, due to the large chainring being in the way.

    Or maybe they were installed on to the crank wrongly at the factory!

    Either way, they seem to shift pretty smoothly. The middle and inner
    rings have extra "half teeth" (can't think what else to call them)
    rivetted on to the inside of the ring - presumably to aid chain pick-up
    when shifting up.

    The outside ring has the word "Tiagra" quite plainly visible in bold
    white type, as do the crank and both front and rear mechs. They are not
    shy of their branding, Shimano.

    d.

  10. Arthur Clune said:

    davek <[email hidden]> wrote:

    : I've just checked my own recently installed Tiagra triple chainset and
    : the etched name and size markings on the middle and inner rings are
    : facing inwards, ie readable from the non-drive side of the bike. HTH.

    Bizarre. I've never ever seen that before

    Um, that's the way it should be... From the service instructions;
    "For the FC-4403, the tooth number marking on the largest chainring should
    face outward, and the markings on the intermediate and smallest chainrings
    should face inward".

    --
    Mike

  11. mb <[email hidden]> wrote:

    : Um, that's the way it should be... From the service instructions;
    : "For the FC-4403, the tooth number marking on the largest chainring should
    : face outward, and the markings on the intermediate and smallest chainrings
    : should face inward".

    Oh I wasn't disputing it was right, just that it seems a very odd way
    to do things. Campag and TA at least keep it simple.

    Arthur

    --
    Arthur Clune PGP/GPG Key: http://www.clune.org/pubkey.txt
    Don't get me wrong, perl is an OK operating system, but it lacks a
    lightweight scripting language -- Walter Dnes

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.