Road Cycling · Public discussion

chain stress

Started by recycled · · Last activity · 25 posts · 1,829 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
15 June 2008
Last activity
23 June 2008
Original author
recycled
Posts
25
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,829
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–25 of 25
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In article <[email hidden]>,

    recycled said:


    "DennisTheBald" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Serious question, serious answer...
    No F.N. way that the weight of a bicycle & the bicyclist breaks a
    chain, not even if they were suspended by that chain and then
    bounced. You and your horse together can not produce enough torque to
    break that chain; big gear, little gear - no way, no how.

    Ok. I assumed the chain might well be the... errr... weakest link.

    FWIW, the carriages of forklifts are chain driven.

    Quoted message said:

    Let me rephrase: What component would be the most stressed from a standing
    start in a high gear?

    I believe it is the rear axle. I've broken a number of them.
    And it's actually /lower/ gears that apply more torque -- or
    rather, allow the rider to apply more torque.

    Higher gears actually work to prevent a rider from
    applying very much torque. That's why it's so hard
    to give the pedals that first push from a dead stop
    in a high gear. On the other hand, jack-rabbit starts
    in low gears sometimes manifest as spontaneous wheelies,
    especially on inclined planes. Then you might hear some
    rearward component go "crack!" and you tersely think: "Oh-oh."

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Having a chain come apart is quite another matter altogether tho, you
    can probably take one apart without even breathing hard. Should one
    slip apart while you're riding trying to put it back together by the
    side of the road with nothing but a pair of pliers will make you sweat
    and curse. If you fear a chain failure and wish to mitigate that
    situation you might slip a powerlink (r) into your purse.

    I don't fear it. Just something I wondered about.

    When reassembling chains, I've learned to drive the pin in
    a little too far, and then drive it into the sweet spot
    from the other side of the chain. And then still visually
    inspect to ensure the sideplates aren't splayed, and tactilely
    inspect to ensure the link isn't stiff. It's really quite
    easy to properly reassemble a chain, and not doing so is just
    inexcusable sloppiness (mea sometimes culpa.)

    If you use a PowerLink and suffer chainsuck or
    over-shifting fall-out, the PowerLink will always
    be in an inaccessible spot. It's a Murphy's Law thing.

    If you wish to avoid disaster: when installing pedals,
    always take care to ensure they're tightly in there.
    /That's/ where there's no room to be perfunctory.

    There's an interesting article in the FAQ about broken axles.

    cheers,
    Tom

    --
    Nothing is safe from me.
    I'm really at:
    tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca

  2. DennisTheBald said:

    Serious question, serious answer...
    No F.N. way that the weight of a bicycle & the bicyclist breaks a
    chain, not even if they were suspended by that chain and then
    bounced. You and your horse together can not produce enough torque to
    break that chain; big gear, little gear - no way, no how.

    Having a chain come apart is quite another matter altogether tho, you
    can probably take one apart without even breathing hard. Should one
    slip apart while you're riding trying to put it back together by the
    side of the road with nothing but a pair of pliers will make you sweat
    and curse. If you fear a chain failure and wish to mitigate that
    situation you might slip a powerlink (r) into your purse.

    http://www.rei.com/product/751366

    A quick link doesn't usually help without a chain tool. The common
    failure scenario is pin pull out, leaving you with a damaged link that
    must be removed before you can use the quick link. Of course if you have
    the tool, you don't really need the quick link.

  3. DennisTheBald said:

    I'm having a little trouble following you here, did the side plates
    break or did the pins slip out of the side plate? One of those things
    seems quite believable and the other completely not.

    Both are known to happen. The pin pull out is the more common, and
    usually an assembly error, the other is likely a manufacturing defect.

    I would even

    Quoted message said:

    entertain that the plastic replacement pins that Shimano provides to
    put a chain back together with could break...(never seen it happen but
    I didn't like the idea and refused to use them for any length of time
    myself) Why would one put plastic bits in their drive chain...crack,
    either smoking it or having one's head up it? Then again, the pin is
    pretty much just to hold the inner and outer side plates together and
    the real stress should be on the flanges of the side plates
    themselves, not the pin... but I don't trust plastic pins on my chain.

    I wouldn't use these: http://www.rei.com/product/544076

    I've never used them, I just used quick links with Shimano chains. When
    SRAM started including them, I switched.

    Quoted message said:

    I maintain that the gear ratio used when starting from a stop has no
    bearing on the life of the chain, maintenance on the other hand does.

    If by "maintenance", you mean cleaning, a guy here (list) did an
    experiment a few years back and found no difference in chain wear
    cleaned vs, not cleaned. It seems no one has bothered to repeat it
    (despite endless talks about cleaning/lubing methods). I don't clean my
    chains any more.

    One knowledgeable poster reported a large difference in chain life
    between regions with different geology, reasoning that the makeup of the
    road grit (say limestone vs. granite) affected wear rate significantly.

    Quoted message said:

    I further assert that side plates don't stretch either and that the
    actual cause of what people tend to call 'chain stretch' is actually
    the side plates wearing into the pins.

    The term is accurate in the sense that the length of the chain changes,
    and in doing so, the pitch changes (the only important dimension). I'd
    be surprised if anyone who care to think about it at all believed the
    stretch was literal.

    Quoted message said:

    Would flipping your chain around say every 20k miles extend its life?
    You would be wearing down the other side of the pin and wallowing out
    the other side of the side plate hole. Rotating your chain will have
    more of a bearing on its usable life span than not shifting to low
    before stopping will.

    Chains have inner and outer links, pins and rollers. The pins, rollers
    and inner link bores all wear. The roller wear doesn't affect the pitch,
    only the pin and inner link wear. See the FAQ. Flipping your chain won't
    help.

  4. Peter Cole said:

    A quick link doesn't usually help without a chain tool. The common
    failure scenario is pin pull out, leaving you with a damaged link that
    must be removed before you can use the quick link. Of course if you
    have the tool, you don't really need the quick link.

    I thought the pins in "modern" chains can't be pressed back in like in the
    good old days? Can certainly reconnect the chain ends, but I'd be hesitant
    to really hammer on it.

    Bill S.

  5. Bill Sornson said:
    Peter Cole said:

    A quick link doesn't usually help without a chain tool. The common
    failure scenario is pin pull out, leaving you with a damaged link that
    must be removed before you can use the quick link. Of course if you
    have the tool, you don't really need the quick link.

    I thought the pins in "modern" chains can't be pressed back in like in the
    good old days? Can certainly reconnect the chain ends, but I'd be hesitant
    to really hammer on it.

    Bill S.

    The context I was replying in was a chain break on the road. This is
    somewhat hypothetical for me since I haven't ever had one, but the point
    I attempted to make was that a chain tool would be necessary, even if
    you had a spare quick link.

    I would rather use a quick link to connect a chain in the garage, even
    though my chains (8-speeds -- where I stopped upgrading) can be pin
    joined, so I'd prefer a quick link even more on the road
    (woods/dark/rain/snow). If I didn't have one, I'd re-pin it rather than
    walk home. I did this once for a guy with a broken Campy C-10 who I came
    across walking home barefoot (Look cleats). He didn't seem to mind that
    we may have been violating the chain warranty.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.