Road Cycling · Public discussion

Century - Which bike?

Started by Ydm9 · · Last activity · 17 posts · 1,134 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
18 March 2004
Last activity
23 March 2004
Original author
Ydm9
Posts
17
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,134
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–17 of 17
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Trying first century this year, should I ride the Fuji
    Touring or my lighter steel framed bike?

  2. Most comfortable. For me a recumbent.

    "ydm9" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    | Trying first century this year, should I ride the Fuji
    | Touring or my lighter steel framed bike?

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Trying first century this year, should I ride the Fuji
    Touring or my lighter steel framed bike?

    Which ever one is more comfortable for you on long rides.
    Owning a Fuji Touring, I'm rather biased, but that would be
    my choice.

    --
    Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in
    the newsgroups if possible).

  4. ydm9 said:

    Trying first century this year, should I ride the Fuji
    Touring or my lighter steel framed bike?

    Ride whichever one you're more comfortable on. If it's a
    wash, go with the lighter one. But be sure to put some long
    miles on the bike of your choice before the century. A
    century is no time to start working out long distance
    fit/comfort problems.
    --
    terry morse Palo Alto, CA bike.terrymorse.combike.terrymorse.com

  5. (ydm9) said:

    Trying first century this year, should I ride the Fuji
    Touring or my lighter steel framed bike?

    I prefer touring bikes for centuries, but all I'm trying to
    do is finish in a reasonable time for me. If I had speed
    goals, I might prefer a racing bike.

    If this is your first century I'd go for comfort,
    which would seem to imply your Fuji, although you
    don't tell us much about the other bike. Just don't
    pack too much on it. 🙂

    MP

  6. "ydm9" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Trying first century this year, should I ride the Fuji
    Touring or my lighter steel framed bike?

    Are you intending to "race" the century or just finish
    comfortably? How different is your steel bike from the Fuji
    in terms of geometry?

  7. "El Paisano" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "ydm9" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Trying first century this year, should I ride the Fuji
    Touring or my lighter steel framed bike?

    Are you intending to "race" the century or just finish
    comfortably? How different is your steel bike from the
    Fuji in terms of geometry?

    I just want to finish. I weigh in at 250, so to finish will
    be the goal. The Fuji does seem to be a little more
    comfortable. The other bike is a Specialized Allez Elite
    steel frame. It is a few pounds lighter with not as relaxed
    a geometry and I don't have a rack on it at the moment. With
    me being overweight, I didn't know how much of a difference
    the 8 or 9 pounds would make in bike weight. I'm leaning
    toward the Fuji for comfort.

  8. In article
    <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    ...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Are you intending to "race" the century or just finish
    comfortably? How different is your steel bike from the
    Fuji in terms of geometry?

    I just want to finish. I weigh in at 250, so to finish
    will be the goal. The Fuji does seem to be a little more
    comfortable. The other bike is a Specialized Allez Elite
    steel frame. It is a few pounds lighter with not as
    relaxed a geometry and I don't have a rack on it at the
    moment. With me being overweight, I didn't know how much
    of a difference the 8 or 9 pounds would make in bike
    weight. I'm leaning toward the Fuji for comfort.

    At that weight, you'll never notice the difference in the
    bike weights. Hell, you might lose that much yourself
    during the ride if you don't keep up on your fluids intake.
    But you will most certainly notice the comfort difference
    after 6 or 7 (or 8 or 9, depending on how fast you ride)
    hours on the bike.

    --
    Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in
    the newsgroups if possible).

  9. ydm9 said:

    I just want to finish. I weigh in at 250, so to finish
    will be the goal. The Fuji does seem to be a little more
    comfortable. The other bike is a Specialized Allez Elite
    steel frame. It is a few pounds lighter with not as
    relaxed a geometry and I don't have a rack on it at the
    moment. With me being overweight, I didn't know how much
    of a difference the 8 or 9 pounds would make in bike
    weight. I'm leaning toward the Fuji for comfort.

    Tough call. Eight or nine pounds difference in bike weight
    is nothing to sneeze at. Unless it's a really flat route,
    the lighter bike will definitely be an advantage. But then,
    if you're uncomfortable for the last 25-30 miles that's not
    good either.

    Try a few 50-60 miles on each bike and see how much
    difference you notice as far as comfort and effort required.

    Art Harris

  10. Harris <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    ydm9 said:

    I just want to finish. I weigh in at 250, so to finish
    will be the goal. The Fuji does seem to be a little more
    comfortable. The other bike is a Specialized Allez Elite
    steel frame. It is a few pounds lighter with not as
    relaxed a geometry and I don't have a rack on it at the
    moment. With me being overweight, I didn't know how much
    of a difference the 8 or 9 pounds would make in bike
    weight. I'm leaning toward the Fuji for comfort.

    Tough call. Eight or nine pounds difference in bike weight
    is nothing to sneeze at. Unless it's a really flat route,
    the lighter bike will definitely be an advantage. But
    then, if you're uncomfortable for the last 25-30 miles
    that's not good either.

    Try a few 50-60 miles on each bike and see how much
    difference you notice as far as comfort and effort
    required.

    Well lets keep the weight in perspective. Lets say the Fuji
    weighs 30lbs and Apecialized weighs 22lbs... that means the
    bike plus the rider will be in the 272-280lb range... and
    of course add a couple liters of water (roughly 2.3 lbs
    each (allowing for the weight of the bottle)and say 5 lbs
    for misc equipment, snacks etc you are looking at say 282-
    290 lbs. Eight pounds is nothing to sneeze at but it really
    only amounts to less than 3% total weight. All things
    considered on a long ride the lower gearing of the touring
    bike might be a bigger asset in climbing hills than a light
    bike for a person in mediocre shape (like myself 🙂). And
    comfort is definitely the most important factor. I did a
    century on a trike and while I wasn't fast I didn't have
    anything hurting at the end except my legs.... but boy did
    they hurt the next day (I was not really prepared for the
    century... my own fault).

    --
    Bill

  11. That's easy. Whuich one are you more comfortable on during
    longer rides?

    - - "May you have the wind at your back. And a really low
    gear for the hills!"

    Chris Zacho ~ "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"

    Chris'Z Corner geocities.comczcorner

  12. Quoted message said:

    Trying first century this year, should I ride the Fuji
    Touring or my lighter steel framed bike?

    Which one would you rather be sitting on for 6-7* hours?

    * very rough guess, YMMV

    p.s. unless it's *very* hilly, I wouldn't let the bike
    weight be a consideration in this case. There's
    probably not a huge difference between these two
    bikes anyway.

    --
    Benjamin Lewis

    The two oldest professions in the world have been ruined by
    amateurs. -- G.B. Shaw

  13. ydm9 said:

    Trying first century this year, should I ride the Fuji
    Touring or my lighter steel framed bike?

    I'd go for the lighter bike. Unless you're carrying a load,
    there's no real advantage to touring geomtry.

    --

    -John ([email hidden])

  14. John Thompson said:
    ydm9 said:

    Trying first century this year, should I ride the Fuji
    Touring or my lighter steel framed bike?

    I'd go for the lighter bike. Unless you're carrying a load,
    there's no real advantage to touring geomtry.

    ...other than stability (non-squirrely handling), wider
    tires, and fender clearance.

    ...all of which may be nice for a first century.

    -Luigi "What did the Romans ever do for US?"

  15. Why do you need a rack? Isn't the ride supported with rest
    stops, so you can replenish water bottles and food stuffed
    in your jersey?

    I guess I'd go for comfort first, but carrying that extra
    weight over 100 miles would certainly detract a great deal
    from my comfort level. The weight difference may not sound
    like a lot in the mathematical abstract, but over 100 miles?
    How comfortable is the steel frame over long distances?
    What's the longest ride you've done on each, and how did
    each bike feel after that distance? How would you
    compare/contrast the ride of the bikes over some significant
    distance? --Roy Zipris

  16. "ydm9" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Trying first century this year, should I ride the Fuji
    Touring or my lighter steel framed bike?


    Touring bike. Road Bike Rider sent an article on preparation
    for a century to those on their mailing list last week. You
    will probably find it interesting and useful.
    roadbikerider.comroadbikerider.com

  17. Roy Zipris said:

    I guess I'd go for comfort first, but carrying that extra
    weight over 100 miles would certainly detract a great
    deal from my comfort level. The weight difference may not
    sound like a lot in the mathematical abstract, but over
    100 miles?

    I somehow doubt a one pound rack will detract from his
    comfort. In comparison, I did a fast double century on my
    commuting bike (which was my only bike at the time),
    complete with rack and my trunk bag. I probably had 5+
    pounds of [censored] in that bag. Extra food, rain jacket , tools,
    second spare tube, wallet, cell phone, etc.

    Quoted message said:

    How comfortable is the steel frame over long distances?
    What's the longest ride you've done on each, and how did
    each bike feel after that distance? How would you
    compare/contrast the ride of the bikes over some
    significant distance? --Roy Zipris

    This sounds like a better idea. As a lot of people have
    said, just ride both of them on decent length trial rides
    and see which is more comfortable.

    --
    Dane Jackson - z u v e m b i @ u n i x b i g o t s . o r g
    The man who sees, on New Year's day, Mount Fuji, a hawk, and
    an eggplant is forever blessed. -- Old Japanese proverb

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.