General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

carb list for nuts

Started by em · · Last activity · 20 posts · 215 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
29 August 2007
Last activity
31 August 2007
Original author
em
Posts
20
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
215
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 20
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Anybody have a list of carbs in nuts, *per ounce*, that they could
    copy/paste into a post? If not, I'll just look it up myself & post it
    sometime.

    All I found on the net was by the cup or T, as follows (fiber already
    subtracted):

    This is per 2T:
    -----------------
    Almonds - 1.4g
    Cashews - 5g
    Chestnuts - 24.2g
    Coconut - 0.7g
    Hazelnuts - 1.2g
    Macadamia Nuts - 0.9g
    Peanut Butter - 4.3g
    Peanuts - 1.8g
    Pecans - 0.6g
    Pine Nuts - 1.7g
    Pistachio Nuts - 3.1g
    Pumpkin Seeds - 2.4g
    Sunflower Seeds - 1.5g
    Walnuts - 1.1g

    TIA

  2. Have you tried http://www.delorie.com/health/ns/ ?

  3. "DJ Delorie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Have you tried http://www.delore.com/health/ns/ ?

    I took a look. Its "another" database to look up food values. The USDA
    database is pretty much the standard & easy to use:

    http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/

    I've seen a few websites on the net that group foods, like nuts, wines,
    fruits, meats, etc. Was hoping to find something with a fairly complete list
    of nuts so that I don't have to search them out in a database.

  4. em said:

    I took a look. Its "another" database to look up food values. The USDA
    database is pretty much the standard & easy to use:

    http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/

    Mine *is* the USDA database, except I do the LC math for you
    (subtracting fiber, pretty pie charts, etc) and let you build
    "standard" nutrition labels for any serving size.

    But it should have ounces for most nuts.

  5. em said:

    I took a look. Its "another" database to look up food values. The USDA
    database is pretty much the standard & easy to use:

    http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/

    Mine *is* the USDA database, except I do the LC math for you
    (subtracting fiber, pretty pie charts, etc) and let you build
    "standard" nutrition labels for any serving size.

    But it should have ounces for most nuts.

  6. em said:

    Anybody have a list of carbs in nuts, *per ounce*, that they could
    copy/paste into a post? If not, I'll just look it up myself & post
    it sometime.

    All I found on the net was by the cup or T, as follows (fiber
    already subtracted):

    It's frustrating how all the books and lists measure some things in
    volume, some in weight, and some things in guesstimates like "1/2
    medium peach". How accurate is "medium"? Probably varies at least as
    much as my appetite.

    The little Atkins carb-counting book I picked up does the same thing.
    I was looking at pasta the other day, because I was going to a dinner
    where the host knew I'm diabetic (it's easiest to just tell them
    that), so she cooked whole-wheat pasta for the spaghetti, since that's
    great for diabetics, right? (Yeah, I know.) On the same page, the
    book gives the amount for regular pasta by weight and the amount for
    whole wheat pasta by volume, so you can't even compare those two
    almost-identical items!

    Anyway, as far as I know, you're stuck making up your own lists from
    the USDA database if you want consistent measurements.

    --
    Aaron -- 285/254/200 -- aaron.baugher.biz

  7. "DJ Delorie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    em said:

    I took a look. Its "another" database to look up food values. The USDA
    database is pretty much the standard & easy to use:

    http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/

    Mine *is* the USDA database, except I do the LC math for you
    (subtracting fiber, pretty pie charts, etc) and let you build
    "standard" nutrition labels for any serving size.

    But it should have ounces for most nuts.

    Cool! I'll spend some time and check it out. Thanks!

  8. "Aaron Baugher" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    em said:

    Anybody have a list of carbs in nuts, *per ounce*, that they could
    copy/paste into a post? If not, I'll just look it up myself & post
    it sometime.

    All I found on the net was by the cup or T, as follows (fiber
    already subtracted):

    It's frustrating how all the books and lists measure some things in
    volume, some in weight, and some things in guesstimates like "1/2
    medium peach". How accurate is "medium"? Probably varies at least as
    much as my appetite.

    Even worse is the way they do things in stores with the prices. I really
    don't give a damn how much meat or cheese costs per ounce. Often times, you
    multiply out the price/oz and it doesn't match what they're charging. A real
    crock! The difference between .28/oz and .35/oz is $1.12 a pound. Not "oh,
    there's only a few pennies difference between this and that." Jerks.
    Marketing [censored].

    Quoted message said:

    The little Atkins carb-counting book I picked up does the same thing.
    I was looking at pasta the other day, because I was going to a dinner
    where the host knew I'm diabetic (it's easiest to just tell them
    that), so she cooked whole-wheat pasta for the spaghetti, since that's
    great for diabetics, right? (Yeah, I know.) On the same page, the
    book gives the amount for regular pasta by weight and the amount for
    whole wheat pasta by volume, so you can't even compare those two
    almost-identical items!

    I have a decent kitchen scale. Its digital, does grams/ozs and tare. I weigh
    everything that needs to be measured & multiply it out. When I was doing
    low-cal, people would comment when they would see something that is normally
    measured in cups, like skim milk, and see me weighing it out on the scale.
    Now, wow, I'm weighing my veggies and slopping on the dressing ;-) Looks odd
    to the uninitiated passer-by, for shizel.

    Quoted message said:


    Anyway, as far as I know, you're stuck making up your own lists from
    the USDA database if you want consistent measurements.

    I'll give it a day or two. I'd like to put together my own little book so
    that when I'm oot and aboot, I'll know what's what.

    Quoted message said:

    Aaron -- 285/254/200 -- aaron.baugher.biz

    Good stuff!!!

  9. Aaron Baugher said:
    em said:

    Anybody have a list of carbs in nuts, *per ounce*, that they could
    copy/paste into a post? If not, I'll just look it up myself & post
    it sometime.

    All I found on the net was by the cup or T, as follows (fiber
    already subtracted):

    It's frustrating how all the books and lists measure some things in
    volume, some in weight, and some things in guesstimates like "1/2
    medium peach". How accurate is "medium"? Probably varies at least as
    much as my appetite.

    The little Atkins carb-counting book I picked up does the same thing.
    I was looking at pasta the other day, because I was going to a dinner
    where the host knew I'm diabetic (it's easiest to just tell them
    that), so she cooked whole-wheat pasta for the spaghetti, since that's
    great for diabetics, right? (Yeah, I know.) On the same page, the
    book gives the amount for regular pasta by weight and the amount for
    whole wheat pasta by volume, so you can't even compare those two
    almost-identical items!

    Anyway, as far as I know, you're stuck making up your own lists from
    the USDA database if you want consistent measurements.

    I don't think there's any way to be completely accurate -- you can
    just do the best you can with what you've got.

    I pretty much weigh everything, which is supposed to be more accurate,
    but it isn't perfect, either. A few months ago, I put my hot broccoli
    on the plate and while I stood there and watched, the weight went down
    and down and down -- I can only assume it was water evaporating. :-)
    Which is my next point -- aside from the confusion on just what a
    "medium" peach is, you then have the variable of how much of that
    peach is just plain water. I've had some pretty "dry" peaches and
    they were yucky! ;-)

    --
    BlueBrooke
    254/225/135

  10. "BlueBrooke" <.@.> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Aaron Baugher said:
    em said:

    Anybody have a list of carbs in nuts, *per ounce*, that they could
    copy/paste into a post? If not, I'll just look it up myself & post
    it sometime.

    All I found on the net was by the cup or T, as follows (fiber
    already subtracted):

    It's frustrating how all the books and lists measure some things in
    volume, some in weight, and some things in guesstimates like "1/2
    medium peach". How accurate is "medium"? Probably varies at least as
    much as my appetite.

    The little Atkins carb-counting book I picked up does the same thing.
    I was looking at pasta the other day, because I was going to a dinner
    where the host knew I'm diabetic (it's easiest to just tell them
    that), so she cooked whole-wheat pasta for the spaghetti, since that's
    great for diabetics, right? (Yeah, I know.) On the same page, the
    book gives the amount for regular pasta by weight and the amount for
    whole wheat pasta by volume, so you can't even compare those two
    almost-identical items!

    Anyway, as far as I know, you're stuck making up your own lists from
    the USDA database if you want consistent measurements.

    I don't think there's any way to be completely accurate -- you can
    just do the best you can with what you've got.

    I pretty much weigh everything, which is supposed to be more accurate,
    but it isn't perfect, either. A few months ago, I put my hot broccoli
    on the plate and while I stood there and watched, the weight went down
    and down and down -- I can only assume it was water evaporating. :-)
    Which is my next point -- aside from the confusion on just what a
    "medium" peach is, you then have the variable of how much of that
    peach is just plain water. I've had some pretty "dry" peaches and
    they were yucky! ;-)

    I've been weighing myself daily and keeping a chart. I'm pretty visual
    thinker & have some background in statistics. I'm looking at the data and
    looking and looking, and its not making sense. I believe there is an unknown
    factor in weight loss and the reason the scale goes up-and-down so
    unpredictably, day-to-day and week-to-week, is because that unknown factor
    is not being controlled. I just don't believe that water is the root cause
    of "scale bobbing". We all seek to control calories or carbs (or both) and
    fret over the water content of broccolli. There is a missing factor, out
    there, damnit, and when I find it I'm going to tell the world, "This is the
    easiest/best/fastest way to lose weight".

    (In the meantime, being the humble guy that I am, I'll stick to Atkin's
    plan. Really, though, there's a factor in weight loss that's being missed --
    I'm sure of it.)

  11. em wrote:
    ..
    ::
    :: Even worse is the way they do things in stores with the prices. I
    :: really don't give a damn how much meat or cheese costs per ounce.
    :: Often times, you multiply out the price/oz and it doesn't match what
    :: they're charging. A real crock! The difference between .28/oz and
    :: .35/oz is $1.12 a pound. Not "oh, there's only a few pennies
    :: difference between this and that." Jerks. Marketing [censored].

    Where do you shop? The stores I shop in never price meat and cheese per
    ounce as none buy them that way. Things that come in cans typcially will
    have price / oz, because that how they are commonly used. I'd object
    strongly to a store pricing meat & cheese on a per oz basis. Deceptive.

  12. em said:


    I've been weighing myself daily and keeping a chart. I'm pretty visual
    thinker & have some background in statistics. I'm looking at the data and
    looking and looking, and its not making sense. I believe there is an unknown
    factor in weight loss and the reason the scale goes up-and-down so
    unpredictably, day-to-day and week-to-week, is because that unknown factor
    is not being controlled. I just don't believe that water is the root cause
    of "scale bobbing".

    Signal noise on the scale readings includes water retained for a
    wide assortment of reasons, food passing through the digestive
    system, variations in lean and bone mass and on and on and on.

    Almost without exception folks want to lose fat and water with
    as little other loss as possible. Neither the scale nor the tape
    are able to tell us our fat mass, and no matter how hard anyone
    tries to control their water it doesn't actually work.

    Folks try varying carb intake to trigger water loss, or cutting
    salt intake or whatever. Wrestlers even take laxatives to do
    spot reductions in what gets measured by the scale. None of
    these efforts change the amount of stored fat so what they
    really do is bounce the scale within its noise. It can be hard
    to understand that every measurement (or every sort ever not
    just scales) has some amount of error/noise in it. It is SO
    tempting to think that the scale says so-and-so therefore that
    means something about stored fat.

    But the scale reading isn't completely without meaning just
    because there's an error range around the number it gives
    you this time. A new low is a new low, and a new high more
    than some amount above a recent low is a gain, but how to
    tell that range ...

    Quoted message said:

    We all seek to control calories or carbs (or both) and
    fret over the water content of broccolli.

    Someone frets over the water content of broccoli? WAY
    over-board on failing to understand that no matter how much
    effort you put into fighting water retention it doesn't work.

    Quoted message said:

    There is a missing factor, out
    there, damnit, and when I find it I'm going to tell the world, "This is the
    easiest/best/fastest way to lose weight".

    When you find it you'll have a new chapter to add to the
    article "Why the scale lies". Losing stuff other than fat in
    the long run doesn't matter as much as losing fat. In fact,
    if there were a way to tell lost lean or bone the goal would
    be to increase those not reduce them.

  13. Roger Zoul said:

    em wrote:
    .
    ::
    :: Even worse is the way they do things in stores with the prices. I
    :: really don't give a damn how much meat or cheese costs per ounce.
    :: Often times, you multiply out the price/oz and it doesn't match what
    :: they're charging. A real crock! The difference between .28/oz and
    :: .35/oz is $1.12 a pound. Not "oh, there's only a few pennies
    :: difference between this and that." Jerks. Marketing [censored].

    Where do you shop? The stores I shop in never price meat and cheese per
    ounce as none buy them that way. Things that come in cans typcially will
    have price / oz, because that how they are commonly used. I'd object
    strongly to a store pricing meat & cheese on a per oz basis. Deceptive.

    The additional "price per ounce" or "price per unit" information used
    to be great for comparison shopping, but not so much anymore -- not at
    my store, anyway. They've messed with the info so much, you still
    have to do the mental math to figure out which is the better buy.

    --
    BlueBrooke
    254/225/135

  14. "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    em wrote:
    .
    ::
    :: Even worse is the way they do things in stores with the prices. I
    :: really don't give a damn how much meat or cheese costs per ounce.
    :: Often times, you multiply out the price/oz and it doesn't match what
    :: they're charging. A real crock! The difference between .28/oz and
    :: .35/oz is $1.12 a pound. Not "oh, there's only a few pennies
    :: difference between this and that." Jerks. Marketing [censored].

    Where do you shop?

    Los Angeles.

  15. BlueBrooke .@. said:
    Roger Zoul said:

    em wrote:
    .
    ::
    :: Even worse is the way they do things in stores with the prices. I
    :: really don't give a damn how much meat or cheese costs per ounce.
    :: Often times, you multiply out the price/oz and it doesn't match what
    :: they're charging. A real crock! The difference between .28/oz and
    :: .35/oz is $1.12 a pound. Not "oh, there's only a few pennies
    :: difference between this and that." Jerks. Marketing [censored].

    Where do you shop? The stores I shop in never price meat and cheese per
    ounce as none buy them that way. Things that come in cans typcially will
    have price / oz, because that how they are commonly used. I'd object
    strongly to a store pricing meat & cheese on a per oz basis. Deceptive.

    Quoted message said:

    The additional "price per ounce" or "price per unit" information used
    to be great for comparison shopping, but not so much anymore -- not at
    my store, anyway. They've messed with the info so much, you still
    have to do the mental math to figure out which is the better buy.

    Yeah, I'll be standing there looking at two brands of cheese slices,
    and one will give the price per ounce and the other will give price
    per pound. (These are for comparison shopping between items that are
    priced by the package.) I can multiply by 16, but if it's only going
    to save me a few pennies, is it really worth it?

    --
    Aaron -- 285/254/200 -- aaron.baugher.biz

  16. Aaron Baugher said:
    BlueBrooke .@. said:
    Roger Zoul said:

    em wrote:
    .
    ::
    :: Even worse is the way they do things in stores with the prices. I
    :: really don't give a damn how much meat or cheese costs per ounce.
    :: Often times, you multiply out the price/oz and it doesn't match what
    :: they're charging. A real crock! The difference between .28/oz and
    :: .35/oz is $1.12 a pound. Not "oh, there's only a few pennies
    :: difference between this and that." Jerks. Marketing [censored].

    Where do you shop? The stores I shop in never price meat and cheese per
    ounce as none buy them that way. Things that come in cans typcially will
    have price / oz, because that how they are commonly used. I'd object
    strongly to a store pricing meat & cheese on a per oz basis. Deceptive.

    Quoted message said:

    The additional "price per ounce" or "price per unit" information used
    to be great for comparison shopping, but not so much anymore -- not at
    my store, anyway. They've messed with the info so much, you still
    have to do the mental math to figure out which is the better buy.

    Yeah, I'll be standing there looking at two brands of cheese slices,
    and one will give the price per ounce and the other will give price
    per pound. (These are for comparison shopping between items that are
    priced by the package.) I can multiply by 16, but if it's only going
    to save me a few pennies, is it really worth it?

    Yup --

    Besides that, anymore I'm more and more "brand loyal." I read labels
    on new things, and stick to the stuff I know. So it really ticks me
    off when they change ingredients, etc., and catch me unawares. I'm a
    definite believer in reading labels, but should we *really* have to do
    it each and every time we pick something up? ;-)

    --
    BlueBrooke
    254/225/135

  17. em said:


    "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    em wrote:
    .
    ::
    :: Even worse is the way they do things in stores with the prices. I
    :: really don't give a damn how much meat or cheese costs per ounce.
    :: Often times, you multiply out the price/oz and it doesn't match what
    :: they're charging. A real crock! The difference between .28/oz and
    :: .35/oz is $1.12 a pound. Not "oh, there's only a few pennies
    :: difference between this and that." Jerks. Marketing [censored].

    Where do you shop?

    Los Angeles.

    Well *that* explains it!

    --
    BlueBrooke
    254/225/135

  18. "Aaron Baugher" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    BlueBrooke .@. said:
    Roger Zoul said:

    em wrote:
    .
    ::
    :: Even worse is the way they do things in stores with the prices. I
    :: really don't give a damn how much meat or cheese costs per ounce.
    :: Often times, you multiply out the price/oz and it doesn't match what
    :: they're charging. A real crock! The difference between .28/oz and
    :: .35/oz is $1.12 a pound. Not "oh, there's only a few pennies
    :: difference between this and that." Jerks. Marketing [censored].

    Where do you shop? The stores I shop in never price meat and cheese per
    ounce as none buy them that way. Things that come in cans typcially will
    have price / oz, because that how they are commonly used. I'd object
    strongly to a store pricing meat & cheese on a per oz basis. Deceptive.

    Quoted message said:

    The additional "price per ounce" or "price per unit" information used
    to be great for comparison shopping, but not so much anymore -- not at
    my store, anyway. They've messed with the info so much, you still
    have to do the mental math to figure out which is the better buy.

    Yeah, I'll be standing there looking at two brands of cheese slices,
    and one will give the price per ounce and the other will give price
    per pound. (These are for comparison shopping between items that are
    priced by the package.) I can multiply by 16, but if it's only going
    to save me a few pennies, is it really worth it?

    That's what *they* want you to think. Fact is those "few pennies" turn into
    dollars per pound pretty damn quickly.

  19. em said:
    Aaron Baugher said:

    Yeah, I'll be standing there looking at two brands of cheese
    slices, and one will give the price per ounce and the other will
    give price per pound. (These are for comparison shopping between
    items that are priced by the package.) I can multiply by 16, but
    if it's only going to save me a few pennies, is it really worth it?

    That's what *they* want you to think. Fact is those "few pennies"
    turn into dollars per pound pretty damn quickly.

    Sometimes they do; sometimes they don't. I'm pretty cheap, so I do
    multiply it out and often there's no difference. I don't think
    they're trying to trick me. After all, if one item is $.49/ounce and
    the other is $6.28/pound, how is that supposed to make me buy the more
    expensive one? If I can multiply, I'm going to figure it out; if I
    can't, I'll be guessing and just as likely to pick the cheaper one.

    More likely two different people made the price tags for those items,
    and one thought per-ounce would be more useful and the other thought
    per-pound would be. Never assume a conspiracy when incompetence is
    enough explanation.

    --
    Aaron -- 285/254/200 -- aaron.baugher.biz

  20. Oh, the nuts you eat. I thought it was maybe a listing of low carb
    fanatics.

    "em" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Anybody have a list of carbs in nuts, *per ounce*, that they could
    copy/paste into a post? If not, I'll just look it up myself & post it
    sometime.

    All I found on the net was by the cup or T, as follows (fiber already
    subtracted):

    This is per 2T:
    -----------------
    Almonds - 1.4g
    Cashews - 5g
    Chestnuts - 24.2g
    Coconut - 0.7g
    Hazelnuts - 1.2g
    Macadamia Nuts - 0.9g
    Peanut Butter - 4.3g
    Peanuts - 1.8g
    Pecans - 0.6g
    Pine Nuts - 1.7g
    Pistachio Nuts - 3.1g
    Pumpkin Seeds - 2.4g
    Sunflower Seeds - 1.5g
    Walnuts - 1.1g

    TIA

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.