Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Cants and elbows

Started by Ben C · · Last activity · 7 posts · 441 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
21 December 2006
Last activity
23 December 2006
Original author
Ben C
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
441
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Picture of a Campag Veloce rear hub and two spokes from the same wheel,
    which was ridden around for 14000km before cracks appeared in the rim.
    One spoke is from the drive side and one from the non-drive side.

    I didn't build this wheel myself and I don't know what kind of "spoke
    line correction" may have been done.

    I don't know for either spoke whether it was outbound or inbound, but I
    think it was one of each as one of them also had more of a bend in it at
    the crossing.

    http://tinyurl.com/wl69x

    The hub flanges are both canted, and the spoke holes are parallel to the
    flanges, as if the flanges were drilled first and then formed into that
    curved-inwards shape. So canting about as optimal as it gets I'd say.

    In spite of that, and in spite of the fact that this is an aluminium
    hub and stainless steel spokes, the spokes clearly have different bends
    at the elbows presumably acquired during the build.

  2. Ben C said:

    Picture of a Campag Veloce rear hub and two spokes from the same wheel,
    which was ridden around for 14000km before cracks appeared in the rim.
    One spoke is from the drive side and one from the non-drive side.

    I didn't build this wheel myself and I don't know what kind of "spoke
    line correction" may have been done.

    and that's the key unknown. if the flange is appropriately canted and
    the holes are perpendicular to the flange, the math clearly shows
    "correction" to be unnecessary. if it still was done in spite of that,
    this evidences builder habit.

    Quoted message said:


    I don't know for either spoke whether it was outbound or inbound, but I
    think it was one of each as one of them also had more of a bend in it at
    the crossing.

    http://tinyurl.com/wl69x

    The hub flanges are both canted, and the spoke holes are parallel to the
    flanges, as if the flanges were drilled first and then formed into that
    curved-inwards shape. So canting about as optimal as it gets I'd say.

    they're drilled after, but it's easy enough to do offset like that.

    Quoted message said:


    In spite of that, and in spite of the fact that this is an aluminium
    hub and stainless steel spokes, the spokes clearly have different bends
    at the elbows presumably acquired during the build.

    yes, but how?!

  3. jim beam said:
    Ben C said:

    Picture of a Campag Veloce rear hub and two spokes from the same wheel,
    which was ridden around for 14000km before cracks appeared in the rim.
    One spoke is from the drive side and one from the non-drive side.

    I didn't build this wheel myself and I don't know what kind of "spoke
    line correction" may have been done.

    and that's the key unknown. if the flange is appropriately canted and
    the holes are perpendicular to the flange, the math clearly shows
    "correction" to be unnecessary. if it still was done in spite of that,
    this evidences builder habit.

    The wheels are the ones that came with the bike, so it's quite likely
    they were machine-built.

    I had a few problems with spokes coming loose on both wheels not long
    after buying the bike (about 6 years ago), and so tightened them up a
    bit and trued the wheels. So I don't think they were built by Jobst.

  4. Ben C said:
    jim beam said:
    Ben C said:

    Picture of a Campag Veloce rear hub and two spokes from the same wheel,
    which was ridden around for 14000km before cracks appeared in the rim.
    One spoke is from the drive side and one from the non-drive side.

    I didn't build this wheel myself and I don't know what kind of "spoke
    line correction" may have been done.


    and that's the key unknown. if the flange is appropriately canted and
    the holes are perpendicular to the flange, the math clearly shows
    "correction" to be unnecessary. if it still was done in spite of that,
    this evidences builder habit.

    The wheels are the ones that came with the bike, so it's quite likely
    they were machine-built.

    I had a few problems with spokes coming loose on both wheels not long
    after buying the bike (about 6 years ago), and so tightened them up a
    bit and trued the wheels. So I don't think they were built by Jobst.

    lol!

  5. Ben C said:

    Picture of a Campag Veloce rear hub and two spokes from the same wheel,
    which was ridden around for 14000km before cracks appeared in the rim.
    One spoke is from the drive side and one from the non-drive side.

    I didn't build this wheel myself and I don't know what kind of "spoke
    line correction" may have been done.

    I don't know for either spoke whether it was outbound or inbound, but I
    think it was one of each as one of them also had more of a bend in it at
    the crossing.

    http://tinyurl.com/wl69x

    The hub flanges are both canted, and the spoke holes are parallel to the
    flanges, as if the flanges were drilled first and then formed into that
    curved-inwards shape. So canting about as optimal as it gets I'd say.

    In spite of that, and in spite of the fact that this is an aluminium
    hub and stainless steel spokes, the spokes clearly have different bends
    at the elbows presumably acquired during the build.

    here are spokes from a wheel built specifically /not/ having the spoke
    line "corrected".

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/38636024@N00/331112190/

  6. jim beam said:
    Ben C said:

    Picture of a Campag Veloce rear hub and two spokes from the same wheel,
    which was ridden around for 14000km before cracks appeared in the rim.
    One spoke is from the drive side and one from the non-drive side.

    I didn't build this wheel myself and I don't know what kind of "spoke
    line correction" may have been done.

    I don't know for either spoke whether it was outbound or inbound, but I
    think it was one of each as one of them also had more of a bend in it at
    the crossing.

    http://tinyurl.com/wl69x

    The hub flanges are both canted, and the spoke holes are parallel to the
    flanges, as if the flanges were drilled first and then formed into that
    curved-inwards shape. So canting about as optimal as it gets I'd say.

    In spite of that, and in spite of the fact that this is an aluminium
    hub and stainless steel spokes, the spokes clearly have different bends
    at the elbows presumably acquired during the build.

    here are spokes from a wheel built specifically /not/ having the spoke
    line "corrected".

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/38636024@N00/331112190/

    Dear Jim,

    Whew!

    I saw that you'd posted some spokes, couldn't figure out at a glance
    what the thread was trying to say, and tried to measure the angles by
    putting the picture into a paint program.

    I need a better program, a different approach, or better eyes.
    Probably some graphics program that would drag and drop one image onto
    another would help.

    As far as I can tell, the shaft of the lower spoke in the picture is
    very slightly curved upward.

    That is, a line drawn along the bottom each spoke will be almost
    straight up to the elbow on the upper spoke, but curves a little
    upward on the lower spoke:
    _
    /
    -----------------------------'
    _
    /
    -----------------************
    curving up a tiny bit

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/38636024@N00/331112190/

    I can't resolve any differences at the elbows themselves.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  7. Quoted message said:
    jim beam said:
    Ben C said:

    Picture of a Campag Veloce rear hub and two spokes from the same wheel,
    which was ridden around for 14000km before cracks appeared in the rim.
    One spoke is from the drive side and one from the non-drive side.

    I didn't build this wheel myself and I don't know what kind of "spoke
    line correction" may have been done.

    I don't know for either spoke whether it was outbound or inbound, but I
    think it was one of each as one of them also had more of a bend in it at
    the crossing.

    http://tinyurl.com/wl69x

    The hub flanges are both canted, and the spoke holes are parallel to the
    flanges, as if the flanges were drilled first and then formed into that
    curved-inwards shape. So canting about as optimal as it gets I'd say.

    In spite of that, and in spite of the fact that this is an aluminium
    hub and stainless steel spokes, the spokes clearly have different bends
    at the elbows presumably acquired during the build.


    here are spokes from a wheel built specifically /not/ having the spoke
    line "corrected".

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/38636024@N00/331112190/

    Dear Jim,

    Whew!

    I saw that you'd posted some spokes, couldn't figure out at a glance
    what the thread was trying to say, and tried to measure the angles by
    putting the picture into a paint program.

    I need a better program, a different approach, or better eyes.
    Probably some graphics program that would drag and drop one image onto
    another would help.

    As far as I can tell, the shaft of the lower spoke in the picture is
    very slightly curved upward.

    That is, a line drawn along the bottom each spoke will be almost
    straight up to the elbow on the upper spoke, but curves a little
    upward on the lower spoke:
    _
    /
    -----------------------------'
    _
    /
    -----------------************
    curving up a tiny bit

    that's true - it's about where the spoke was leaning against the flange.
    but that's not what i was aiming to illustrate!

    Quoted message said:


    http://www.flickr.com/photos/38636024@N00/331112190/

    I can't resolve any differences at the elbows themselves.

    nor can i - /that's/ what i think is important! i had to build this
    wheel very carefully to /not/ bend anything on lacing. i gave the wheel
    the full mavic method treatment though - i wanted to ensure the spokes
    were fully bedded, and this is the result.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.