Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Cannodale R1000 (~1995) frame question.

Started by Shabby · · Last activity · 5 posts · 740 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
5 August 2003
Last activity
5 August 2003
Original author
Shabby
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
740
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I just bought a bike second hand, and there's what looks like a kink in the seatstay on the chainring side of the bike, as it attaches to the chainstay.

    I was wondering whether this is normal for this frame, or have I been shafted by someone whose done a dodgy repair?

    It's a white frame, probably circa 1995 or so, given that it's got 600 groupset on it.

  2. If you mean where the seatstay is welded to the dropout, it could be an ugly weld. My C'dale (CADD3)
    frame has a pretty lumpy weld at the dropout. - Bill "Shabby" <[email hidden]> wrote
    in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I just bought a bike second hand, and there's what looks like a kink in the seatstay on the
    chainring side of the bike, as it attaches to the chainstay.

    I was wondering whether this is normal for this frame, or have I been shafted by someone whose
    done a dodgy repair?

    It's a white frame, probably circa 1995 or so, given that it's got 600 groupset on it.

    --

    Quoted message said:

    --------------------------<


    Posted via cyclingforums.com cyclingforums.comcyclingforums.com

  3. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I just bought a bike second hand, and there's what looks like a kink in the seatstay on the
    chainring side of the bike, as it attaches to the chainstay. I was wondering whether this is normal
    for this frame, or have I been shafted by someone whose done a dodgy repair? It's a white frame,
    probably circa 1995 or so, given that it's got 600 groupset on it.

    I'm pretty sure what you describe is normal for cannondales. The tubes they use are so fat that they
    have to crimp them in that area to have enough room for the chainrings. Take a peek at another
    cannondale and you should see the same thing.
    -----------------
    Alex __O _-\<,_ (_)/ (_)

  4. Shabby <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    I just bought a bike second hand, and there's what looks like a kink in the seatstay on the
    chainring side of the bike, as it attaches to the chainstay.

    I was wondering whether this is normal for this frame, or have I been shafted by someone whose
    done a dodgy repair?

    It's a white frame, probably circa 1995 or so, given that it's got 600 groupset on it.

    I just took a look at mine. It doesn't have a kink perse it is more of a taper. Both seatstays have
    it. My Cannondake is also old with 600EX originally on it.

  5. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Alex Rodriguez
    I'm pretty sure what you describe is normal for cannondales. The tubes they use are so fat that they have to crimp them in that area to have enough room for the chainrings. Take a peek at another cannondale and you should see the same thing. [/B]

    Yep, that's what it's like. I guess in this case it looked a bit worse becuase the paint was starting to come off, and it looked like a dodgy weld and paint effort.

    Thanks for the ressurance guys.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.