Can Vrijman Be Trusted?

Allez1 said:

From the UCI press release:

"The UCI firmly deplores the behaviour of Mr. Vrijman, who has prematurely
voiced, offending the agreements that foresaw that all parties implied would
be informed before any public comment on the report content would be done."

Well, he is a lawyer^^

Allez1 said:

From the UCI press release:

"The UCI firmly deplores the behaviour of Mr. Vrijman, who has prematurely
voiced, offending the agreements that foresaw that all parties implied would
be informed before any public comment on the report content would be done."

Aren't they the guys who leaked the test results to begin with?

"Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Allez1 said:

From the UCI press release:

"The UCI firmly deplores the behaviour of Mr. Vrijman, who has
prematurely
voiced, offending the agreements that foresaw that all parties implied
would
be informed before any public comment on the report content would be
done."

Aren't they the guys who leaked the test results to begin with?

Not according to you.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Allez1" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

From the UCI press release:

"The UCI firmly deplores the behaviour of Mr. Vrijman, who has prematurely
voiced, offending the agreements that foresaw that all parties implied

would

Quoted message said:

be informed before any public comment on the report content would be

done."

Can Vrijman Be Trusted? That depends. Can the UCI prove that this agreement
existed? If yes, can the UCI prove that Vrijman did not send them the
report before speaking to the media? There are lots on unanswered
questions, and frankly I don't give a damn who was told first, who was
supposed to be first, or who cut the line and will have their wrists slapped
by the teacher first. It's a stupid issue to bring up.

"Allez1" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...
| From the UCI press release:
|
| "The UCI firmly deplores the behaviour of Mr. Vrijman, who has prematurely
| voiced, offending the agreements that foresaw that all parties implied
would
| be informed before any public comment on the report content would be
done."
|

So you're saying that the results can't be trusted because the release of
the information did not follow the agreed upon established procedures. A
problem of the way the information appeared, casting doubt on the validity
of the information itself.

Dare I hope that you were being intentionally ironic when posting this?

trg said:

"Allez1" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...
| From the UCI press release:
|
| "The UCI firmly deplores the behaviour of Mr. Vrijman, who has prematurely
| voiced, offending the agreements that foresaw that all parties implied
would
| be informed before any public comment on the report content would be
done."
|

So you're saying that the results can't be trusted because the release of
the information did not follow the agreed upon established procedures. A
problem of the way the information appeared, casting doubt on the validity
of the information itself.

Dare I hope that you were being intentionally ironic when posting this?

I'd doubt it, he seems to think the system, and Pound, are fair, open,
objective, and responsible.
Bill C

"trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Allez1" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...
| From the UCI press release:
|
| "The UCI firmly deplores the behaviour of Mr. Vrijman, who has
prematurely
| voiced, offending the agreements that foresaw that all parties implied
would
| be informed before any public comment on the report content would be
done."
|

So you're saying that the results can't be trusted because the release of
the information did not follow the agreed upon established procedures. A
problem of the way the information appeared, casting doubt on the validity
of the information itself.

Dare I hope that you were being intentionally ironic when posting this?

You are the only one to see the irony . Congratulations!

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"Allez1" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...
|
| "trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
| news:[email hidden]...
| > "Allez1" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
| > [email hidden]...
| > | From the UCI press release:
| > |
| > | "The UCI firmly deplores the behaviour of Mr. Vrijman, who has
| > prematurely
| > | voiced, offending the agreements that foresaw that all parties implied
| > would
| > | be informed before any public comment on the report content would be
| > done."
| > |
| >
| > So you're saying that the results can't be trusted because the release
of
| > the information did not follow the agreed upon established procedures. A
| > problem of the way the information appeared, casting doubt on the
validity
| > of the information itself.
| >
| > Dare I hope that you were being intentionally ironic when posting this?
| You are the only one to see the irony . Congratulations!
|

And now sarcasm.