Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Can this fixie be built better?

Started by Lobo Tommy · · Last activity · 13 posts · 1,459 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
25 April 2004
Last activity
26 April 2004
Original author
Lobo Tommy
Posts
13
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,459
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–13 of 13
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Surly Steamroller frame,
    Suzue track hubs,
    Profile bar and stem,
    Michelin tires,
    Selle Italia Nitrox saddle,
    Kalloy post,
    Mavic MA3 rims,
    Sugino crank (49T),
    15t track cog,
    and an RX100 front brake

    Can you build a better fixie than this using the Steamroller frame?

  2. In article <[email hidden]>, Lobo Tommy

    Quoted message said:

    Surly Steamroller frame,
    Suzue track hubs,
    Profile bar and stem,
    Michelin tires,
    Selle Italia Nitrox saddle,
    Kalloy post,
    Mavic MA3 rims,
    Sugino crank (49T),
    15t track cog,
    and an RX100 front brake

    Can you build a better fixie than this using the Steamroller frame?

    Better? I don't know. I suppose "more suitable" would be a more
    accurate term. And that is contingent on your expectations, budget,
    intended use of the bike, etc...

    Here's my .02. The 49/15 chainring/cog combination may be hard on your
    knees. I'd go for lower gearing. I live in a relatively flat city -
    Toronto - and my chainring/cog setup is 48/17 with 165mm cranks. At
    times this setup is a bit much: Once the drive train components wear
    out they'll be replaced with a 47/18 setup (or thereabout).

    From a maintenance standpoint, if you plan on extensively using the
    fixie in snowy or rainy conditions (i.e as a commuter) you may want to
    opt for hubs that utilize cartridge bearings. I use a set of Phils
    (These are expensive!) but I believe Miche and others make cartridge
    fixed gear hubs. Every Spring I just pop the old cartridge out... No
    setting cones.

    Regarding the crankset; bear in mind the BB height of your Steamroller.
    The longer the arms the more the possibility you may grind a pedal
    while cornering - especially over uneven terrain. Said grinding of
    pedal may be followed by intimate contact with the blacktop - a painful
    experience!

    Bars, stem, saddle, seatpost etc... No comment. Let your sense of
    aesthetics, budget and experience dictate these. I prefer threaded
    headsets but this may not be an option with your flavour of forks.

    As far as the MA3's. I'm riding on a pair of these now (36hole) and
    once they wear out or crack they'll be replaced with your basic single
    wall non anodized aluminum variety of rim. For my needs, there's
    nothing in the performance of the Ma3s over less expensive options that
    justifies the cost. And you should note; quality of wheelbuild is just
    as important as wheel components in determining the strength and
    durability of your wheels.

    Happy riding
    luke

  3. (Lobo Tommy) said:

    Surly Steamroller frame,
    Suzue track hubs,
    Profile bar and stem,
    Michelin tires,
    Selle Italia Nitrox saddle,
    Kalloy post,
    Mavic MA3 rims,
    Sugino crank (49T),
    15t track cog,
    and an RX100 front brake

    Can you build a better fixie than this using the Steamroller frame?

    Surely the question should be "can you build a better fixie for this
    money by not wasting a pile of cash on a Steamroller?" For my money,
    the Fort 7005 Track is a better lightweight general purpose frame, and
    the On-One Pompino is a better bomb-proof street bike, and they're
    both cheaper than a Steamroller, by enough to allow an upgrade to
    Miche hubs and cranks. Maybe this doesn't apply where you are. You're
    running about the same spec level as my hack bike, so if that's what
    you built it for you're probably close. 49x15 is pretty tall for a
    hack bike, but they're your knees :-)

    Kinky Cowboy*

    *Batteries not included
    May contain traces of nuts
    Your milage may vary

  4. Quoted message said:

    Can you build a better fixie than this using the Steamroller frame?

    No, dog, that's the Jones.

    --

    _______________________ALL AMIGA IN MY MIND_______________________
    ------------------"Buddy Holly, the Texas Elvis"------------------
    __________306.350.357.38>>[email hidden]__________

  5. empbt6-<< Surly Steamroller frame,
    Suzue track hubs,
    Profile bar and stem,
    Michelin tires,
    Selle Italia Nitrox saddle,
    Kalloy post,
    Mavic MA3 rims,
    Sugino crank (49T),
    15t track cog,
    and an RX100 front brake >><BR><BR>
    << Can you build a better fixie than this using the Steamroller frame?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    <BR><BR>

    whaddyamean 'better'? Sounds fine altho a 49/15 is a pretty tall gear( I use a
    42/16). I wouldn't use MA-3 either, we have a bunch of eyelet pull outs. Either
    Velocity Aeros or Ritchey trekking rims..both about $30.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  6. Luke-<< From a maintenance standpoint, if you plan on extensively using the
    fixie in snowy or rainy conditions (i.e as a commuter) you may want to
    opt for hubs that utilize cartridge bearings >><BR><BR>

    Suzue Promax are cart bearings..The 'basic' hubs are not. I agree, Phils are
    the best, have them on both of my bikes..Fixie and road bike.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  7. Lobo Tommy said:

    Surly Steamroller frame,
    Suzue track hubs,
    Profile bar and stem,
    Michelin tires,
    Selle Italia Nitrox saddle,
    Kalloy post,
    Mavic MA3 rims,
    Sugino crank (49T),
    15t track cog,
    and an RX100 front brake

    Can you build a better fixie than this using the Steamroller frame?

    Jobst would use MA2s from his stockpile ;-)

  8. Peter Chisholm said:

    [...] I wouldn't use MA-3 either, we have a bunch of eyelet pull outs. Either
    Velocity Aeros or Ritchey trekking rims..both about $30.

    Peter, you'd said good things about the MA-3 in the past.
    E.g. on Nov 23, 2001, in a thread with the subject

    Building wheels for 'heavier' riders' said:

    When new, I listened to those that called the MA-3 a
    'dog(Jobst) and others that I think were more [censored]
    about the MA-2 going away than the design of the MA-3.
    Now after a year or so of building dozens of these,
    I can say they are good rims, not expensive and make
    a GOOD wheelset...from my experience, not just looking
    at a picture on a web site(jobst again).

    Has the MA-3 changed since then, or ... ?

    Tom Ace

  9. Kinky Cowboy <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    by not wasting a pile of cash on a Steamroller?" For my money,
    the Fort 7005 Track is a better lightweight general purpose frame, and
    the On-One Pompino is a better bomb-proof street bike, and they're
    both cheaper than a Steamroller.

    Umm... On which side of the pond?

    Whitfit.

  10. According to Lobo Tommy <[email hidden]>:

    [order of post changed]

    Quoted message said:

    Can you build a better fixie than this using the Steamroller frame?

    Potentially.

    Quoted message said:

    Surly Steamroller frame,

    Why the Steamroller? They seem like nice enough frames, but:

    1. I don't like threadless headsets
    2. "Surly" is a marketing front for QBP, a big supplier in Minnesota.
    The actual frames are made by robots in Taiwan.

    Quoted message said:

    Suzue track hubs,

    The Suzue basic hubs are pretty nasty. I'm about to try a set of
    Promax instead.

    Quoted message said:

    Mavic MA3 rims,

    I've never heard anything good, but I don't really know. I have an Open
    Pro on my fixed and it seems nice.

    Quoted message said:

    Sugino crank (49T),
    15t track cog,

    That's way too huge, I think.

    Quoted message said:

    and an RX100 front brake

    Sounds like a nice time.

    ---
    Lars

  11. crux-<< Peter, you'd said good things about the MA-3 in the past.
    E.g. on Nov 23, 2001, in a thread with the subject
    'Building wheels for "heavier" riders', you wrote: >><BR><BR>

    Yep, sure did. Once again, we put a lot of trust in a manufacturer, that proved
    to be misplaced. We had WAY to many MA-3s come back to us with eyelets that
    pulled out. After about the 10th one, we sent all the MA-3s back to Mavic..

    They always built just fine, easy to get finished. Always used 100 kgf, dbl
    butted spokes...but...

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  12. Luke said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Kinky

    Cowboy said:
    (Lobo Tommy) said:

    Surly Steamroller frame,
    Suzue track hubs,
    Profile bar and stem,
    Michelin tires,
    Selle Italia Nitrox saddle,
    Kalloy post,
    Mavic MA3 rims,
    Sugino crank (49T),
    15t track cog,
    and an RX100 front brake

    Can you build a better fixie than this using the Steamroller frame?

    Surely the question should be "can you build a better fixie for this
    money by not wasting a pile of cash on a Steamroller?" For my money,
    the Fort 7005 Track is a better lightweight general purpose frame, and
    the On-One Pompino is a better bomb-proof street bike, and they're
    both cheaper than a Steamroller, by enough to allow an upgrade to
    Miche hubs and cranks.

    <snip>

    I'll go you one better Kink. Why bother with a dedicated single speed/
    track bike frameset at all? I've two fixed gears - a Medici and an
    Alcyon (local housebrand) that utilize older road frames with horiz
    drops. Both bikes can accomodate racks, the Alcyon takes full fenders
    panniers etc.... and these can be built up into multispeed bikes when
    inclined.

    These frames are not of shoddy quality: they use butted tubes (531 and
    Brain) and ride wonderfully. For those, like me, who're on a budget and
    prize versatility, few options yield more value than converting an
    older roadie.

    luke

    Couldn't agree more; I've got a 1983 Raleigh Record Ace (full 531C
    tubeset, and spaced 120mm at the back!) converted to fixed, even rode
    a time trial on it a week or two ago, and a 1986 Hirame (Kuwahara)
    Osaka Pro, Ishiwata 022 DB CroMo tubes with the 126mm dropouts
    squeezed together by a Miche track hub. Both bought new and still
    going strong. Can't compete with my dad's Hobbs, which he bought
    second hand in 1947 and rode to work nearly every day until 1990,
    still ready to ride in the shed "just in case I want to go back to
    fixed", as he said last week.

    Kinky Cowboy*

    *Batteries not included
    May contain traces of nuts
    Your milage may vary

  13. In article <[email hidden]>, Kinky

    Cowboy said:

    Can't compete with my dad's Hobbs, which he bought
    second hand in 1947 and rode to work nearly every day until 1990,
    still ready to ride in the shed "just in case I want to go back to
    fixed", as he said last week.

    Kinky Cowboy*

    <snip>

    Wow! That has to be a record!

    luke

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.