Can The Plano SuperWanker Read? :-)

B. Lafferty says...

Quoted message said:

Or is his Blackberry malfunctioning? From ProCycling today:

Quoted message said:

"He [Armstrong] also asked for an independent inquiry to take place to find
out how results of his alleged dope tests came to be leaked to L'Equipe."

Quoted message said:

Doesn't he know that the UCI has ordered an "independent" investigation into
this and the validity of the test results reported in L'Equipe?

Obviously, Lance doesn't consider any investigation related to the UCI to be
independent, dumbass.

"Mad Dog" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty says...

Quoted message said:

Or is his Blackberry malfunctioning? From ProCycling today:

Quoted message said:

"He [Armstrong] also asked for an independent inquiry to take place to
find
out how results of his alleged dope tests came to be leaked to L'Equipe."

Quoted message said:

Doesn't he know that the UCI has ordered an "independent" investigation
into
this and the validity of the test results reported in L'Equipe?

Obviously, Lance doesn't consider any investigation related to the UCI to
be
independent, dumbass.

So on that one, he's probably in the same bed with [censored] Pound.

B. Lafferty said:

Or is his Blackberry malfunctioning? From ProCycling today:

"He [Armstrong] also asked for an independent inquiry to take place to find
out how results of his alleged dope tests came to be leaked to L'Equipe."

Doesn't he know that the UCI has ordered an "independent" investigation into
this and the validity of the test results reported in L'Equipe?

Still want us to believe you're not obsessed w/ Armstrong?

YASFOS!

"Scott" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty said:

Or is his Blackberry malfunctioning? From ProCycling today:

"He [Armstrong] also asked for an independent inquiry to take place to
find
out how results of his alleged dope tests came to be leaked to L'Equipe."

Doesn't he know that the UCI has ordered an "independent" investigation
into
this and the validity of the test results reported in L'Equipe?

Still want us to believe you're not obsessed w/ Armstrong?

YASFOS!

The guy opens his mouth to the press and invariably puts his foot in it.
He's retired. Let him close his mouth and go tap Sheryl. If anyone's
obsessing it's the media people at ProCycling and CyclingNews. Or is it the
PSW who's obsessively mouthing off to the press. It's like the PSW is
scared of something.

The "media" people are doing their job.

You're obsessed and making people sad because you don't seem to know when enough is enough.

Why bother "re-posting" from Pro Cycling if you aren't?

Have a great day!

DT

davetowle said:

The "media" people are doing their job.

You're obsessed and making people sad because you don't seem to know
when enough is enough.

Why bother "re-posting" from Pro Cycling if you aren't?

Have a great day!

DT

--
davetowle

Yea, what he said!

YASFOS!

"davetowle" <[email hidden]> wrote in
message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

The "media" people are doing their job.

You're obsessed and making people sad because you don't seem to know
when enough is enough.

Why bother "re-posting" from Pro Cycling if you aren't?

Have a great day!

DT

Ha! If it's in the cycling press it's fair game for discussion here. If you
can't or won't discuss the SuperWanker's ignorance or disingenuousness,
that's your issue. BTW, have you seen Anthony Pope's Peloton People in the
January issue of ProCycling? The ghosts of Tour de France past visit
SuperWanker. Obsessively funny stuff from AP.

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:wD1qf.7655
.. If you can't or won't discuss the SuperWanker's ignorance or
disingenuousness, that's your issue. BTW, have you seen Anthony Pope's
Peloton People in the > January issue of ProCycling? The ghosts of Tour de
France past visit SuperWanker. Obsessively funny stuff from AP.

Quoted message said:

Brian,

You are right that what you've posted is fair game, but you appear to be a
one trick pony to people and it gets old. Somebody in his mid-late 50s like
you are should have a lot more to talk about with regard to cycling than
doping and Lance Armstrong. You need a new schtick.

-Philip

"Philip W. Moore, Jr." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:wD1qf.7655
. If you can't or won't discuss the SuperWanker's ignorance or
disingenuousness, that's your issue. BTW, have you seen Anthony Pope's
Peloton People in the > January issue of ProCycling? The ghosts of Tour
de
France past visit SuperWanker. Obsessively funny stuff from AP.

Quoted message said:

Brian,

You are right that what you've posted is fair game, but you appear to be a
one trick pony to people and it gets old. Somebody in his mid-late 50s
like
you are should have a lot more to talk about with regard to cycling than
doping and Lance Armstrong. You need a new schtick.

-Philip

Do a Google search. The obsessed pro-SuperWanker faction that inhabits rbr
tends only to remember the posts re SW. That's because they're obsessed
with SW's sainthood. When the SW seeks out the press to make idiotic
statements, he's fair game, whether the SW tifosi like it or not.

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:jk2qf.8155> with SW's
sainthood. When the SW seeks out the press to make idiotic

Quoted message said:

statements, he's fair game, whether the SW tifosi like it or not.

You're missing the point. The majority of what you talk about is doping
related. It gets old. Just bite your tongue a little. You come across as
a self-effacing weenie sometimes.

"Philip W. Moore, Jr." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:jk2qf.8155> with
SW's
sainthood. When the SW seeks out the press to make idiotic

Quoted message said:

statements, he's fair game, whether the SW tifosi like it or not.

You're missing the point. The majority of what you talk about is doping
related. It gets old. Just bite your tongue a little.

Ya know, these guys just keep getting caught out. If they stopped, there'd
be no doping discussion. IMO, it's a topic that needs not only discussion,
but trasparency on the part of the riders, teams and UCI. Until that
happens, doping is and will continue to be the story that overshadowes all
else in bicycle racing.

Quoted message said:

You come across as
a self-effacing weenie sometimes.

Whatever.

B. Lafferty said:

Philip W. Moore said:

You're missing the point. The majority of what you talk about is doping
related. It gets old. Just bite your tongue a little.

Ya know, these guys just keep getting caught out. If they stopped, there'd
be no doping discussion.

Nonsense. Even if the riders stopped, we'd always be able
to talk about the riders who _used_ to dope. Even after they
retire. Obsession: it's the gift that keeps on giving.

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty said:

Philip W. Moore said:

You're missing the point. The majority of what you talk about is
doping
related. It gets old. Just bite your tongue a little.

Ya know, these guys just keep getting caught out. If they stopped,
there'd
be no doping discussion.

Nonsense. Even if the riders stopped, we'd always be able
to talk about the riders who _used_ to dope. Even after they
retire. Obsession: it's the gift that keeps on giving.

But, it would be nice to have the discussion in the past tense.

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Breathe

Please stop breathing.

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Ya know, these guys just keep getting caught out. If they stopped,
there'd
be no doping discussion.

Nonsense. Even if the riders stopped, we'd always be able
to talk about the riders who _used_ to dope. Even after they
retire. Obsession: it's the gift that keeps on giving.

But, it would be nice to have the discussion in the past tense.

That's an odd phrasing. Do you mean:

"I'd don't want to dwell on doping, but if it is mentioned it would be nice
to have the discussion in the past tense."

or

"But, it would be nice to have the discussion in the past tense."

"Philip W. Moore, Jr." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Breathe

Please stop breathing.

One day, each of us will do exactly that. Enjoy the moment.

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"> One day, each of us will do exactly that. Enjoy the moment.

Shhh. I'm meditating about doping control.

"Philip W. Moore, Jr." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"> One day, each of us will do exactly that. Enjoy the moment.

Shhh. I'm meditating about doping control.

Interesting tonglen.

B. Lafferty said:

Quoted message said:

Nonsense. Even if the riders stopped, we'd always be able
to talk about the riders who _used_ to dope. Even after they
retire. Obsession: it's the gift that keeps on giving.

But, it would be nice to have the discussion in the past tense.

Dumbass -

Ronald Reagan. War on Drugs.

You and him are of the same mind. Delusional.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.