Quoted message said:I gotta ask though - why? I can see where you'd want these brakes to replace an ABrake or a UBrake
that was rusted. But you're _adding_ the posts, right? Generally, cantilevers are lighter and
easier to work with
in
Quoted message said:most respects. Owners of Ritcheys/Bridgestones/TerraTechs sold here with Euclid brakes whine
asking for cantilevers
I have never really like setting up cantilevers, and thought that it might be nice to use a Mafac
centerpull mounted on bosses on a frame that I am having built for me. It'll be an audax style bike,
and there is something about tradition, as irrational as it is, that keeps popping up when I make
decisions. Also irrationally, I have an aversion to the brand that begins with Sh. I thought that by
using Euclids I could have an all Campy audax bike. There are other ways to do it all Campy, like
find older calipers with "long reach". When will Campy make a longer reach modern caliper and a 110
bcd crank? They'd certainly sell a fair amount of this stuff.
I didn't know that U brakes, or centerpulls on studs are easier to work on than cantilevers. I may
very well leave emotion behind and get some Tecktro or Shimano calipers.
BTW, I really believe that many choices we make around cycling hardware are emotionally based. I
just told a kid in the neighborhood bike shop who was lamenting about his inability to afford a high
end bike that he, nor I, nor most people would know the difference between a $600.00 bike and a
$1200. one. In fact what 600. buys these days used to cost $1200.00. I doubt that I could really
tell the difference between a $1200. bike and the ones that I ride.
Gary Jacobson Rosendale, NY