Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Campy 10 vs. Shimano 10

Started by Shamus · · Last activity · 6 posts · 1,702 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
19 November 2003
Last activity
8 December 2003
Original author
Shamus
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,702
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Does anyone know if they work together?
    I mean Shimano 10s. hub and casette in Campy 10s. levers and derailleur?

  2. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Shamus
    Does anyone know if they work together?
    I mean Shimano 10s. hub and casette in Campy 10s. levers and derailleur?

    DA 10 cog spacing is 3.9 and campy is 4.12.

  3. Does anyone else know something? Has anybody tried it yet?

  4. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by boudreaux
    DA 10 cog spacing is 3.9 and campy is 4.12.

    For 9-speed, Shimano spacing is 4.34 and Campy is 4.55, a difference of 0.21. 9-speed shimano cassettes and hubs work fine with campy shifter/derailleurs. Since the 10-speed difference is 0.22 (based on the numbers you give), about the same as with 9-speed, my GUESS is that it will also work fine. I have not yet seen any testimonials from people who have actually tried it, though.

    --Josh

  5. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by jgatts
    For 9-speed, Shimano spacing is 4.34 and Campy is 4.55, a difference of 0.21. 9-speed shimano cassettes and hubs work fine with campy shifter/derailleurs. Since the 10-speed difference is 0.22 (based on the numbers you give), about the same as with 9-speed, my GUESS is that it will also work fine. I have not yet seen any testimonials from people who have actually tried it, though.

    --Josh

    Yeah, but given the error is spread over 10 cogs rather than 9, it could be sketchier.

  6. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by boudreaux
    Yeah, but given the error is spread over 10 cogs rather than 9, it could be sketchier.

    9*0.21mm = 1.89 mm
    10*0.22mm = 2.20 mm

    2.20 - 1.89 = 0.31 mm

    0.31 mm is the increased error over the whole cassette, a very small number. I think it should actually only be half of this, since you would adjust your derailleur with the chain on a middle cog.

    I guess it's possible that the extra 0.15 mm would be enough to push the shifting over the edge into the realm of unacceptability, but I doubt it.

    Somebody needs to try this and report the results! 😄

    --Josh

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.