John Clayton top-posted:
Quoted message said:Never mind the fancy debate, this is absolute and utter b*ll*cks.
For instance this debate would not occur in Denmark or Holland - or any
other civilised nation.
Trouble is here we are subject to the (all bow down NOW) motoring press/
pressure.
How sodding petty to start on a few harmless, inoffensive benign cyclists.
Our planet might perish tomorrow but "hey kids" lets hand out some FPN's.
Job done - what a load of [censored].
Plonker.
Actually, this article isn't news anyway. It has happened in Cambridge
a week or two after the clocks go back every year for at least 20
years. I think it is an entirely reasonable way to get the message
across that bicycles need lights when ridden between sunset and
sunrise. In current society, the trend seems to be to get away with
what you can, so the threat of a small fine will probably have the
desired effect on rather more that the small number of people that
actually get caught.
Cambridge is unusual anyway. It has lots of cycles in a small city,
many of them ridden by students who will have rarely used them as real
transport before they left home, so may be less aware of the
requirements.
Actually, I'd rather the Police used a slightly diffent tactic. Stop
the unlit cyclists and offer them 2 options - a £30 fine, or buy and
spend 15 minutes fitting a set of legal lights that they just happen to
have on sale for £25. But of course that's far too sensible so will
never happen.
TL