General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Cadence?

Started by David Hallswort · · Last activity · 22 posts · 1,549 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
16 September 2003
Last activity
16 September 2003
Original author
David Hallswort
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,549
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–22 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In article <[email hidden]>, Scott Cunningham <[email hidden]> wrote:

    [snippage]

    Quoted message said:

    The second thing I noticed was that it felt like my legs were working a lot harder to maintain an
    even mile pace. I could also tell that the workload was being distributed a little differently
    among the leg muscles. My shins and inside portion of the quads felt like they got a good workout.
    For others who have made the switch, how long should I expect it to take before I adapt to the
    quicker stride rate and it feels good and natural?

    Depends. I was a slow and sporadic adaptor, so it was a couple of years to go from 145 to 175. If
    I remember Denny's experiences in working with people, a few weeks can be sufficient.

    Quoted message said:

    Third, it was tough to resist the urge to naturally go faster. With a quicker rate, it was tough to
    hold back. I naturally felt like picking up the speed.

    Some brain retraining was part of it. You ordinarily only hit this cadence at race pace, so your
    brain thinks you must be racing if you're going this stride rate. This is faster to retrain, a few
    runs in my case.

    Quoted message said:

    Fourth, it felt like my stride length decreased to compensate for the increase in turnover.

    Yep. Has to. Higher cadence and unchanged stride length means faster running.

    Quoted message said:

    Finally, the other thing that I noticed was that when I went back to my usual slower cadence, the
    biggest sensation was one of trying to slam my heel into the ground. I could also feel the braking
    sensation that a slower cadence gives you.

    Any other tips on changing stride rate?

    My vote would be continue as you are for a bit. A number of muscles are getting used both more,
    and in new ways. It does take time to develop the ones you're using more and also some time to
    retrain your reflexes (on what constitutes proper stride). Few weeks time range for both.

    That braking feeling you were noticing on going back to lower cadence was also one of my signs
    that the higher cadence really was a good thing even for us non-elites. Irrespective of stride
    rate, it's a good thing to avoid slamming your heel into the ground. I made some of my progress on
    stride rate at times when I was actually trying to focus on running smoothly over the ground.

    --
    Robert Grumbine radix.net~bobg Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links.
    Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much evidence and ease; this
    great facility makes them less appreciated than they would be had they been presented in a more
    abstruse manner." Two New Sciences

  2. As an aside:

    Plantar loading and cadence alterations with fatigue.

    Willson JD, Kernozek TW.

    Department of Physical Therapy, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, 54601, USA.

    PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to identify changes in loading characteristics of the
    foot associated with fatigue during running. METHODS: Nineteen healthy subjects ranging from 20 to
    30 yr (mean = 22.3, SD
    = 2.4) were equipped with the Pedar in-shoe measurement system (Novel GmbH)
    for the assessment of plantar loading. After acclimation to the treadmill, subjects were progressed
    through the Ohio State protocol for exercise testing until fatigue was reported using Borg's RPE
    scale. Six right footsteps were recorded at 150 Hz for each subject's comfortable running pace
    under normal and fatigued conditions. A series of repeated measures multiple analysis of variance
    was performed for all dependent variables analyzed in this study including peak force (PF),
    force-time integral (FTI), peak pressure (PP), and pressure-time integral (PTI) for all regions of
    the plantar surface. RESULTS: Decreased step time, significantly smaller values under the heel for
    PP, PF, FTI, CT, and PTI, and trends toward increased medial forefoot loading were identified while
    subjects were running under fatigued conditions (alpha < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results suggest
    that subjects change running technique and plantar surface loading characteristics in response to
    fatigued conditions through increased cadence, decreased loading of the heel, and increased medial
    forefoot loading.

    PMID: 10613435 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.