On 13 Mar 2006 07:38:15 -0800, the female offspring of a local area
network said:Funny, your post is a troll in itself. It served no purpose but to
[censored], moan, and bait. Yes there are some real wing-nuts on the group,
like the profoundly dim Sorni--but the signal to noise is still strong.
And this wasn't noise?
Quoted message said:Typically socialist Brit of you to complain and walk away without
taking the initiative in helping make this a better group. I'm a Swede
in the states and I know the mentality well, it's the symptom of an
overly zealous nanny state that gels spinal columns.
Eh, maybe, but storming off on a Huffy[1] is a grand tradition on
Usenet.
Quoted message said:Too bad you're not reading this, but you've achieved your goal, trolled
and gotten a response. Congrats.
FAWK, the OP could be sitting there tallying up the score before
dropping in with a new nick.
Whoever it was that advocated the use of a killfile as the first line
of defense against serial trolls, I quite agree with them. Five
minutes spent identifying the top recent offenders removed over 500
posts. It was just shy of that until I added a couple of selected
subject items as well.
[1] Well, what would you expect a troll to ride, a Giant?
--
Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
Some gardening required to reply via email.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.