Doki said:Anyone care to give any pointers? Pre requisite is that it's cheap (che=
apest
Quoted message said:my local "proper" bike shop has is =A3200 or so) and that I won't destr=
oy it
Quoted message said:that quickly :
I would not spend any less than that, and I'd only spend that little on=20 a very basic machine
where they've spent money on Stuff. that matters,=20 rather than what is thought to look cool.
Quoted message said:Is back suspension considered the bare minimum nowadays, or are solid b=
ikes
Quoted message said:still handy?=20
I'm not an MTB expert, but my understanding is you don't want to even=20 think about rear suspension
until you're well past "cheap". Suspension=20 has to be done well to be worthwhile, and for "done
well" read "costs=20 Real Money". At the =A3200 level don't touch rear sus with a 15' barge=20 pole,
I would say. Front sus may be okay, but still the case that at=20 the bottom end of the market you
may be better off with rigid and=20 spending your cash on the frame and transmission.
Quoted message said:I'd like something with quick release wheels so I can chuck it in the back of the car, though I
understand these can be fitted later. Preferably not made of cast iron drainpipes either.
Anything half decent from a reputable manufacturer will have QR. wheels=20 and will almost certainly
have an alloy frame these days. If it doesn't =
have QR wheels it's almost certainly junk you should avoid.
At the cheap end I'd personally get something like a Specialized=20 Hardrock Rigid at =A3260, or if
you want front suspension (good on rocky =
ground) then something like the Giant Boulder at ~ =A3215.
Avoid disc brakes as well at these prices, they're for show rather than=20 effect unless done well,
much like suspension.
Pete. --=20 Peter Clinch University of Dundee Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Medical Physics,
Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden]
dundee.ac.uk~pjclinchOpen ↗