General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Bush proves the theory

Started by David · · Last activity · 28 posts · 1,195 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
5 November 2005
Last activity
23 November 2005
Original author
David
Posts
28
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,195
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 28
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. You can be a stupid president and still be effective (Reagan) but if you are
    a moron you will be a dismal failure.

  2. "David" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You can be a stupid president and still be effective (Reagan) but if you
    are a moron you will be a dismal failure.

    Seems that George has the 2nd lowest popularity now of any other US
    president in history. (Nixon's was lower just before he resigned)

  3. On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:35:38 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "David" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You can be a stupid president and still be effective (Reagan) but if you
    are a moron you will be a dismal failure.

    Seems that George has the 2nd lowest popularity now of any other US
    president in history. (Nixon's was lower just before he resigned)

    This is fairly meaningless unless Democrats take over the house in 06.
    If that happens I'd expect impeachment proceedings to take place
    almost immediately.

    --
    Is this thing on?

  4. "Joe Humble" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:35:38 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "David" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You can be a stupid president and still be effective (Reagan) but if you
    are a moron you will be a dismal failure.

    Seems that George has the 2nd lowest popularity now of any other US
    president in history. (Nixon's was lower just before he resigned)

    This is fairly meaningless unless Democrats take over the house in 06.
    If that happens I'd expect impeachment proceedings to take place
    almost immediately.


    I don't know about impeachment - isn't his only crime having an abysmally
    low intelligence level?

  5. On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:24:49 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    You can be a stupid president and still be effective (Reagan) but if you are
    a moron you will be a dismal failure.

    Very good point! The difference being Reagan took advice from his
    advisors. Bushit had assembled the best team of people possible, but
    refuses to listen to a word they say. Bushit is just a moron.

  6. On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:52:52 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Suck my fat one

    be careful what you wish for...he will.

  7. "TheEarlOfBillRodgers" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:24:49 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    You can be a stupid president and still be effective (Reagan) but if you
    are
    a moron you will be a dismal failure.

    Very good point! The difference being Reagan took advice from his
    advisors. Bushit had assembled the best team of people possible, but
    refuses to listen to a word they say. Bushit is just a moron.

    Yes Reagan had excellent advice and he had good instincts and of course was
    a decent communicator. Bush just mumbles the same mantra about 'freedom' and
    'we'll smoke out those varmints' - stuff like that. Works for a while but
    you can see he is hollow. His legacy will be the dumbest president in
    history.

  8. "TheEarlOfBillRodgers" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:52:52 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Suck my fat one

    be careful what you wish for...he will.

    Now that's funny

  9. On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:26:55 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Yes Reagan had excellent advice and he had good instincts and of course was
    a decent communicator. Bush just mumbles the same mantra about 'freedom' and
    'we'll smoke out those varmints' - stuff like that. Works for a while but
    you can see he is hollow. His legacy will be the dumbest president in
    history.

    It's just sad that it took america this long to realize it. I cannot
    understand how such a detestable piece of scum got reelected. The
    first time he was appointed by the supreme court, but the second
    time???? There's no excuse except half of americans who vote are
    idiots.

  10. "TheEarlOfBillRodgers" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:26:55 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Yes Reagan had excellent advice and he had good instincts and of course
    was
    a decent communicator. Bush just mumbles the same mantra about 'freedom'
    and
    'we'll smoke out those varmints' - stuff like that. Works for a while but
    you can see he is hollow. His legacy will be the dumbest president in
    history.

    It's just sad that it took america this long to realize it. I cannot
    understand how such a detestable piece of scum got reelected. The
    first time he was appointed by the supreme court, but the second
    time???? There's no excuse except half of americans who vote are
    idiots.

    Probably because this was perceived to be 'America at war' with terrorism
    etc - the incumbent always has a big advantage in wartime

  11. On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 18:11:40 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Probably because this was perceived to be 'America at war' with terrorism
    etc - the incumbent always has a big advantage in wartime

    In a REAL war maybe, but not in this idiotic private war? This was/is
    just a case of doing daddys bidding. I saw that from the first day,
    why couldn't the rest of america? Luckily only a small part of
    americans vote, and half of those are idiots, which means the larger
    majority of americans are ok, they just don't vote.

  12. "David" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "TheEarlOfBillRodgers" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:26:55 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Yes Reagan had excellent advice and he had good instincts and of course
    was
    a decent communicator. Bush just mumbles the same mantra about 'freedom'
    and
    'we'll smoke out those varmints' - stuff like that. Works for a while


    but

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    you can see he is hollow. His legacy will be the dumbest president in
    history.

    It's just sad that it took america this long to realize it. I cannot
    understand how such a detestable piece of scum got reelected. The
    first time he was appointed by the supreme court, but the second
    time???? There's no excuse except half of americans who vote are
    idiots.

    Probably because this was perceived to be 'America at war' with terrorism
    etc - the incumbent always has a big advantage in wartime

    To Bill:

    Hey moron, it takes at least 51% to vote someone in, not half.

  13. John said:

    To Bill:

    Hey moron, it takes at least 51% to vote someone in, not half.

    To Theasswipe,

    Hey stupid, there's more than one party.

  14. "Joe Humble" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:35:38 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "David" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    You can be a stupid president and still be effective (Reagan) but if you
    are a moron you will be a dismal failure.

    Seems that George has the 2nd lowest popularity now of any other US
    president in history. (Nixon's was lower just before he resigned)

    This is fairly meaningless unless Democrats take over the house in 06.
    If that happens I'd expect impeachment proceedings to take place
    almost immediately.

    --
    Is this thing on?

    It would be like Christmas in November!


  15. Quoted message said:

    Got any stats of your accomplishments? Where do I look them up?

    Well...unlike your beloved President I can walk AND chew gum at the
    same time...let's see dubbya try that one...

  16. "WooferBearATL" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Joe Humble" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:35:38 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "David" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > You can be a stupid president and still be effective (Reagan) but if
    > you
    > are a moron you will be a dismal failure.

    Seems that George has the 2nd lowest popularity now of any other US
    president in history. (Nixon's was lower just before he resigned)

    This is fairly meaningless unless Democrats take over the house in 06.
    If that happens I'd expect impeachment proceedings to take place
    almost immediately.

    --
    Is this thing on?

    It would be like Christmas in November!


    I agree, but the Dems don't have the balls to do it.

  17. "ATP*" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "WooferBearATL" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Joe Humble" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:35:38 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >
    >"David" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >news:[email hidden]...
    >> You can be a stupid president and still be effective (Reagan) but if
    >> you
    >> are a moron you will be a dismal failure.
    >
    >Seems that George has the 2nd lowest popularity now of any other US
    >president in history. (Nixon's was lower just before he resigned)
    >

    This is fairly meaningless unless Democrats take over the house in 06.
    If that happens I'd expect impeachment proceedings to take place
    almost immediately.

    --
    Is this thing on?

    It would be like Christmas in November!


    I agree, but the Dems don't have the balls to do it.


    Yup, it appears that we are lead by fools, cowards and liars on both sides
    of the aisle.

  18. "Robert Schuh" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    David said:

    "John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    [......]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You are nothing but a worthless piece of [censored] parasite. I'll bet your

    Quoted message said:

    son became a doctor out of spite for your loser ass. No wonder you
    can't ask him for any advice.

    I've seen your worthless house with that [censored] deck. You're not fooling
    anyone. It's only the little [censored] like you that have the biggest mouth.

    David,
    I suggest you ignore this troll.

    I think he has a screw loose for sure

    Quoted message said:

    I still can't get my head around how sad this
    newsgroup has become. How could a group that used to have Will Brink, Dan
    Duchaine, Pat Arnold, Lyle McDonald and MANY others with real brains and
    information to the morons that post here today? THE only one who has a
    good
    excuse is my good friend Dan Duchaine who passed away. I wish Dan were
    alive to
    chime in on all the baseball/steroid [censored].


    Dan Duchaine died so young (only 47) - he had one helluva pedigree

  19. On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:42:46 -0700, Robert Schuh <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    You need to get some material that is above the 2nd grade level.

    2nd grade was the best 10 years of his life.

  20. On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:45:54 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    He says he can squat 1500 lbs.

    LOLOLOL. I'm still cracking up over that one.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.