I would appreciate it if anybody had some comments on this product. Seems pretty cool to me. I don't wear a helmet at the moment, but I am thinking about it.
This is a helmet with a built in rear view mirror. Anybody with experience using them?
Thanks. --
QUIPd 1.02: (407 of 664) -> E-mail returned to sender: Insufficient voltage. ##2296 #'Mandrake Linux.'
This is a helmet with a built in rear view mirror. Anybody with experience using them?
So, if you want one, by all means get one, for your own enjoyment. The Heads Up Display aspect /is/ somewhat ingriguing. But I wouldn't count on it revolutionizing cycling.
Thanks for your info. I'll buy one, but first i'd like to see the quality of the image one sees in the mirror. Problem is, where to get hold of one around here. 🙁
If I buy one, I'll report my impressions back here.
--
QUIPd 1.02: (84 of 664) -> "So long as the new moon returns in heaven a bent, beautiful bow, -> so long will the fascination of archery keep hold of the hearts of -> men. Maurice Thompson - The Witchery of Archery - 1878 ##2305 #'Mandrake Linux.'
Thanks for your info. I'll buy one, but first i'd like to see the quality of the image one sees in the mirror. Problem is, where to get hold of one around here. 🙁
yes I like the idea. I bet it is better then the mirror I have attached to my helmet. but even that the image is pretty good.
Thanks for your info. I'll buy one, but first i'd like to see the quality of the image one sees in the mirror. Problem is, where to get hold of one around here. 🙁
yes I like the idea. I bet it is better then the mirror I have attached to my helmet. but even that the image is pretty good.
No mirrors for me! I'm still surprised by the quality of the image I see in the bathroom mirror every morning. Shoulder checks work. Drivers notice when you are checking and very often assume you are about to move to the left. (North American protocols here) , and pull back a bit so you can make your move. Best regards, Bernie
No mirrors for me! I'm still surprised by the quality of the image I see in the bathroom mirror every morning. Shoulder checks work. Drivers notice when you are checking and very often assume you are about to move to the left. (North American protocols here) , and pull back a bit so you can make your move. Best regards, Bernie
with my glasses and all I can't turn enough to see clearly. also with this racing bike I tend to swerve when I do.
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 19:21:52 -0700, Bernie <[email hidden]> wrote:
(snip)
Quoted message said:
No mirrors for me! I'm still surprised by the quality of the image I see in the bathroom mirror every morning. Shoulder checks work. Drivers notice when you are checking and very often assume you are about to move to the left. (North American protocols here) , and pull back a bit so you can make your move.
It doesn't have to be just one or the other. Bike mirrors have blind spots just like car mirrors, so it is still necessary to do the occasional shoulder check. I always do it before turning or changing lanes, and occasionally at other times.
Still, I find my eyeglass mounted mirror very useful for keeping track of what's behind me, and I rarely ride without it.
Shoulder checks work. Drivers notice when you are checking and very often assume you are about to move to the left. (North American protocols here) , and pull back a bit so you can make your move. Best regards, Bernie
with my glasses and all I can't turn enough to see clearly. also with this racing bike I tend to swerve when I do.
Well, I confess to having vision issues too. L eye is very nearsighted, R eye is very farsighted, a little astygmatism (you spell it!) and these damn 'progressive' lenses. Even so, it is a learned skill to shoulder check safely. "Safely" meaning while keeping a straight line of forward motion. I think I learned to shoulder check by doing the look back rather slowly and carefully, versus quickly. That way you do it without anxiety and no jerky motion. It's like most learned moves: first you get good, then you get fast. I know racing bikes are pretty twitchy, it's probably easiest to do with your hands on the hoods? Bernie
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 19:21:52 -0700, Bernie <[email hidden]> wrote:
(snip)
Quoted message said:
No mirrors for me! I'm still surprised by the quality of the image I see in the bathroom mirror every morning. Shoulder checks work. Drivers notice when you are checking and very often assume you are about to move to the left. (North American protocols here) , and pull back a bit so you can make your move.
It doesn't have to be just one or the other. Bike mirrors have blind spots just like car mirrors, so it is still necessary to do the occasional shoulder check. I always do it before turning or changing lanes, and occasionally at other times.
Still, I find my eyeglass mounted mirror very useful for keeping track of what's behind me, and I rarely ride without it.
MP
No problem here! I know there are pluses to mirrors. I just don't use one. With luck, this won't turn into a mirror war! Bernie
with my glasses and all I can't turn enough to see clearly. also with this racing bike I tend to swerve when I do.
If you swerve when you shoulder check, you _definitely_ need to practice! Start practicing in a deserted parking lot, using painted lines to check your straightness. When you're good there, try it on a fog line where the shoulder's wide.
You should be able to ride straight, within 6" or so. Get good at riding.
If you swerve when you shoulder check, you _definitely_ need to practice! Start practicing in a deserted parking lot, using painted lines to check your straightness. When you're good there, try it on a fog line where the shoulder's wide.
never had the problem till the racing bike but it is getting better.
If you swerve when you shoulder check, you _definitely_ need to practice! Start practicing in a deserted parking lot, using painted lines to check your straightness. When you're good there, try it on a fog line where the shoulder's wide.
never had the problem till the racing bike but it is getting better.
Some folks find it easiest to look under their armpit.
I find "softer" pedalling while shoulder checking helps me maintain a straight line. YMMV.
If neck flexibility is an issue, it might help to do occasional shoulder checks while walking, just to get those neck muscles used to it. Do both sides - left and right.
cheers, Tom
-- -- Powered by FreeBSD Above address is just a spam midden. I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca
In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] (Badger
South) said:
Quoted message said:
If neck flexibility is an issue, it might help to do occasional shoulder checks while walking, just to get those neck muscles used to it. Do both sides - left and right.
In full biking gear, cleats and helmet? OK, I'll give it a try. ;-D
Don't forget to signal your turns.
cheers, Tom
-- -- Powered by FreeBSD Above address is just a spam midden. I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca
If you swerve when you shoulder check, you _definitely_ need to practice! Start practicing in a deserted parking lot, using painted lines to check your straightness. When you're good there, try it on a fog line where the shoulder's wide.
never had the problem till the racing bike but it is getting better.
Some folks find it easiest to look under their armpit.
I find "softer" pedalling while shoulder checking helps me maintain a straight line. YMMV.
If neck flexibility is an issue, it might help to do occasional shoulder checks while walking, just to get those neck muscles used to it. Do both sides - left and right.
In full biking gear, cleats and helmet? OK, I'll give it a try. ;-D
-B
Quoted message said:
cheers, Tom
-- -- Powered by FreeBSD Above address is just a spam midden. I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca
-- Email Replies to johnson<nospm>01j <att> ntelos <dott> net
In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] (Badger
South) said:
Quoted message said:
If neck flexibility is an issue, it might help to do occasional shoulder checks while walking, just to get those neck muscles used to it. Do both sides - left and right.
In full biking gear, cleats and helmet? OK, I'll give it a try. ;-D
Don't forget to signal your turns.
cheers, Tom
-- -- Powered by FreeBSD Above address is just a spam midden. I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca
Well, that's easy, considering I can use both hands. ;-P
-B
-- Email Replies to johnson<nospm>01j <att> ntelos <dott> net
I ride a short wheelbased recumbent bike. The 'over the shoulder' look to see rear traffic is difficult on a recumbent so I thought the idea of a built in review mirror was perfect for me. I saw one of these things on eBay and made the purchase (around $100 USD). Unfortunately, the helmets are set up for standard type bike riders. When in the recumbent position, I get a pretty good view of the road directly in back of me, but must tilt my head down in front to see what's really coming up behind me.
The quality of the image is not what is advertised on the web site. It is distorted to the point that 'objects in mirror are not as close as they appear'- the opposite of what you would think. The actual viewing mirror is small, and it does take some getting used to. The quality of the helmet is good, well made, and not too bad looking, but I could've spent my $100 on a regular helmet and been happier.
I would appreciate it if anybody had some comments on this product. Seems pretty cool to me. I don't wear a helmet at the moment, but I am thinking about it.
This is a helmet with a built in rear view mirror. Anybody with experience using them?
I ride a short wheelbased recumbent bike. The 'over the shoulder' look to see rear traffic is difficult on a recumbent so I thought the idea of a built in review mirror was perfect for me. I saw one of these things on eBay and made the purchase (around $100 USD). Unfortunately, the helmets are set up for standard type bike riders. When in the recumbent position, I get a pretty good view of the road directly in back of me, but must tilt my head down in front to see what's really coming up behind me.
The quality of the image is not what is advertised on the web site. It is distorted to the point that 'objects in mirror are not as close as they appear'- the opposite of what you would think. The actual viewing mirror is small, and it does take some getting used to. The quality of the helmet is good, well made, and not too bad looking, but I could've spent my $100 on a regular helmet and been happier.
Thanks Chuck.
I've pretty much decided to skip on this helmet, partly because the distributor here in SA do not seem to want to sell me one anyway.
I'll just practice stretching those neck muscles.
--
QUIPd 1.02: (54 of 664) -> The things that come to those that wait may be the -> things left by those that got there first ##2337 #'Mandrake Linux.'
I would appreciate it if anybody had some comments on this product. Seems pretty cool to me. I don't wear a helmet at the moment, but I am thinking about it.
This is a helmet with a built in rear view mirror. Anybody with experience using them?
Thanks. --
QUIPd 1.02: (407 of 664) -> E-mail returned to sender: Insufficient voltage. ##2296 #'Mandrake Linux.'
I would appreciate it if anybody had some comments on this product. Seems pretty cool to me. I don't wear a helmet at the moment, but I am thinking about it.
This is a helmet with a built in rear view mirror. Anybody with experience using them?
Thanks. --
QUIPd 1.02: (407 of 664) -> E-mail returned to sender: Insufficient voltage. ##2296 #'Mandrake Linux.'
I would appreciate it if anybody had some comments on this product. Seems pretty cool to me. I don't wear a helmet at the moment, but I am thinking about it.
This is a helmet with a built in rear view mirror. Anybody with experience using them?
Thanks. --
QUIPd 1.02: (407 of 664) -> E-mail returned to sender: Insufficient voltage. ##2296 #'Mandrake Linux.'