The impression I got was more of readers here being curious what prompted the banning, than the
banning itself. Only one poster (I think) questioned the banning action and even then they were not
sure of what lead up to the ban being imposed. As for messages showing up on A.R.B.R. about guns,
the only ones I remember dealt with one guy talking about wasting a dog and the rest dealt with the
Mini-Guns used on Choppers. At one point it began to look like everyone in this NG was in the
Military or were retired from the Military or were in Jump School.
My take on this is, talking about guns is fine, talking about blowing away someone you are in
communication with on a Public access board is NOT fine and removing/banning anyone going that way
is perfectly justified.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"'BentRider" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Nice to know that I'm so... popular...
>
> That thread was deleted because of personal threats made between two posters. It had nothing to do
> with the bashing of my sponsors. Search my archives. I let plenty of that stuff slide. Most of my
> sponsors read my boards and are plenty capable of defending themselves.
>
> AA and Ramjet (the two posters who got banned) have been reinstated and both thanked me for the
> way I handled it.
>
> The only person banned from 'BROL is glend1234. At the time of his "banning" there was a VERY
> nasty thread going on about guns. These same threads have cropped up here on a.r.b.r. as well.
> Again, people were starting to threaten each other so I deleted the thread and posted a message
> telling everyone to stay away from the topic for at least a little while. Glenn then started four
> gun threads in one day. He thought it was funny. I didn't and still don't. I warned him twice
> before I banned him.
>
> I frequent a lot of message boards and feel confident in saying that mine is very liberal when
> compared to some others.
>
> Bryan J. Ball www.bentrideronline.com