Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

broken crank (was: crank crack)

Started by Tom Paterson · · Last activity · 10 posts · 2,344 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
20 May 2003
Last activity
23 May 2003
Original author
Tom Paterson
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,344
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Don't think this is one of the examples I've seen referenced in r.b.tech:

    technology.open.ac.ukmem ccf4.html

    Good one there (IMHO)! Looks like the common Campagnolo "spider crack" might have found full
    expression on this crank. --Tom Paterson

  2. Tom Paterson said:

    technology.open.ac.ukmem ccf4.html

    Quoted message said:

    Good one there (IMHO)! Looks like the common Campagnolo "spider crack" might have found full
    expression on this crank.

    Nice picture. I've had cranks like that.

    This is a common failure and the one most easily prevented but the bicycle industry doesn't want to
    bother. One solution is to take the Campagnolo C-Record approach and make the crank one of the five
    spider arms. Ritchey cranks do that also. Shimano doesn't do that because their cranks are hollow
    and might crack from the chainring bolt entering the hollow crank. However, with the crank in the
    picture, Campagnolo and others who use this design need only to machine away the thin web between
    spider and both sides of the crank so that it no longer looks like the skin between index and middle
    finger spread apart.

    Jobst Brandt [email hidden] Palo Alto CA

  3. Quoted message said:

    [email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    However, with the crank in the picture, Campagnolo and others who use this design need only to
    machine away the thin web between spider and both sides of the crank so that it no longer looks
    like the skin between index and middle finger spread apart.

    Hmmm...just curious. Your statement seems to suggest that the web can contribute to a crank's
    failure rather than its strength. How is this so?

    Sig Chicago

  4. <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    This is a common failure and the one most easily prevented but the bicycle industry doesn't want
    to bother. One solution is to take the Campagnolo C-Record approach and make the crank one of the
    five spider arms. Ritchey cranks do that also. Shimano doesn't do that because their cranks are
    hollow and might crack from the chainring bolt entering the hollow crank. However, with the crank
    in the picture, Campagnolo and others who use this design need only to machine away the thin web
    between spider and both sides of the crank so that it no longer looks like the skin between index
    and middle finger spread apart.

    Dremel.

    Or needle file and about 20 minutes...

  5. anonymous snipes:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    However, with the crank in the picture, Campagnolo and others who use this design need only to
    machine away the thin web between spider and both sides of the crank so that it no longer looks
    like the skin between index and middle finger spread apart.

    Quoted message said:

    Hmmm... just curious. Your statement seems to suggest that the web can contribute to a crank's
    failure rather than its strength. How is this so?

    Thin webs that are at the extremes of a bending element carry many times the stress of the main
    member. That is why I-beams have thick flat "caps" connected by a thin web less than half the
    thickness of the caps. Cutting the beam in half lengthwise through the web and putting the caps back
    to back so that the half-webs are outermost is what we have in the crank. Structural engineers are
    aware of this but the bicycle industry is not.

    In the collection of failed cranks, we also see evidence of failures at embossed or cast-in logos.
    Formerly, most cranks had a lengthwise vanity groove on the outside that reduced crank stiffness by
    at least 30%. There are still I-beam like cranks on the market even though this shape has
    notoriously poor torsional stiffness. It may be a fashion statement because many people recognize
    the I-bean shape and think cranks are stressed mainly in bending. Failures are as much from torsion
    as bending. Where do these guys go to school, if at all?

    pardo.netFAIL 001.html

    Jobst Brandt [email hidden] Palo Alto CA

  6. <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Thin webs that are at the extremes of a bending element


    carry many

    Quoted message said:

    times the stress of the main member. That is why I-beams


    have thick

    Quoted message said:

    flat "caps" connected by a thin web less than half the


    thickness of

    Quoted message said:

    the caps. Cutting the beam in half lengthwise through the


    web and

    Quoted message said:

    putting the caps back to back so that the half-webs are


    outermost is

    Quoted message said:

    what we have in the crank. Structural engineers are aware


    of this but

    Quoted message said:

    the bicycle industry is not.

    In the collection of failed cranks, we also see evidence


    of failures

    Quoted message said:

    at embossed or cast-in logos. Formerly, most cranks had a


    lengthwise

    Quoted message said:

    vanity groove on the outside that reduced crank stiffness


    by at least

    Quoted message said:

    30%. There are still I-beam like cranks on the market


    even though

    Quoted message said:

    this shape has notoriously poor torsional stiffness. It


    may be a

    Quoted message said:

    fashion statement because many people recognize the I-bean


    shape and

    Quoted message said:

    think cranks are stressed mainly in bending. Failures are


    as much

    Quoted message said:

    from torsion as bending. Where do these guys go to


    school, if at all?

    Art school.

    Matt O.

  7. Quoted message said:

    Where do these guys go to school, if at all?

    Sloan ?

    The bike trade is about selling things, not making things. If you want to see a better crank, try
    educating the bike mag journos who rave about a product, despite some obvious design horror
    (certainly for the UK MTB scene).

    When a logo is seen as a fashionable branding, then it's going to be on there. Only when the punter
    starts to see it as a potential stress riser, and not buy the product, will they disappear.

  8. Andy Dingley said:
    Quoted message said:

    Where do these guys go to school, if at all?

    Quoted message said:

    Sloan?

    Quoted message said:

    The bike trade is about selling things, not making things. If you want to see a better crank, try
    educating the bike magazine journalists who rave about a product, despite some obvious design
    horror (certainly for the UK MTB scene).

    Quoted message said:

    When a logo is seen as a fashionable branding, then it's going to be on there. Only when the
    punter starts to see it as a potential stress riser, and not buy the product, will they disappear.

    I still have hope for Shimano. Their DA cranks no longer have a vanity groove, they don't emboss
    their logo and they are continuing in their pursuit of a reliable and easy to install BB. The
    current ones don't meet that criterion and that's why we see the one on the Lance Armstrong bicycle
    with the double pinch-bolt cranks. They may be thinking about pedal attachment on the back burner.

    lancearmstrong.comD37499CB86AB278C86256D15006F21CD

    Jobst Brandt [email hidden] Palo Alto CA

  9. [email hidden] wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    ... Their DA cranks no longer have a vanity groove, they don't emboss


    their logo and they are continuing in their pursuit of a reliable and easy to install BB. ...>

    I haven't follow bike trends for ~ 10 years. When was the last generation that Shimano cranks have
    "vanity" grooves? In the 70s?

  10. Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    ... Their DA cranks no longer have a vanity groove, they don't emboss


    their logo and they are continuing in their pursuit of a reliable and easy to install BB. ...>

    "Richard Chan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I haven't follow bike trends for ~ 10 years. When was the last generation that Shimano cranks have
    "vanity" grooves? In the 70s?

    The Dura Ace EX before it became New Dura Ace (7400) in 1983?4?

    --
    Andrew Muzi yellowjersey.orgyellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April 1971

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.