Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

"brevettata" tandem?

Started by Ryan Cousineau · · Last activity · 40 posts · 2,809 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
6 March 2007
Last activity
3 April 2007
Original author
Ryan Cousineau
Posts
40
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,809
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 40
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm trying to chase down the provenance of a bike I haven't seen yet.

    At a guess, I google-translated the name, and (as many of you know) it
    means "patented" in the land of Giros and Fiats.

    Any ideas what make of tandem would likely be misidentified this way? Or
    is it a real marque?

    I hope to take a look at it fairly shortly.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
    "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
    to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

  2. Ryan Cousineau said:

    I'm trying to chase down the provenance of a bike I haven't seen yet.
    At a guess, I google-translated the name, and (as many of you know) it
    means "patented" in the land of Giros and Fiats.
    Any ideas what make of tandem would likely be misidentified this way? Or
    is it a real marque?
    I hope to take a look at it fairly shortly.

    Can't help with your specific problem but it happens all the time.

    As in "I have this [part, bike, rim]. It's a "Brevettata" [or "Brevete",
    or "SGCG", or "SICC", or "VIA", or "8.8.8." or by "Pat Pending", the
    industrious Irishman who made so many things. . .] Can you fix those?".

    He has no idea what it is. He looked at a part marked -
    Brevettata= Patented, Italy
    Brevete= Patented, France
    SGCG= French engineering society
    SICC = Italian version
    VIA= Japanese Vehicle Industry Association, a qualitative certification
    8.8.8. = Suntour trademark, Shimano's is 3.3.3.

    Good luck with your tandem, whatever it may be!
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  3. A Muzi said:
    Ryan Cousineau said:

    I'm trying to chase down the provenance of a bike I haven't seen yet.
    At a guess, I google-translated the name, and (as many of you know) it
    means "patented" in the land of Giros and Fiats.
    Any ideas what make of tandem would likely be misidentified this way? Or
    is it a real marque?
    I hope to take a look at it fairly shortly.

    Can't help with your specific problem but it happens all the time.

    Quoted message said:

    He has no idea what it is. He looked at a part marked -
    Brevettata= Patented, Italy
    VIA= Japanese Vehicle Industry Association, a qualitative certification

    Well, that at least explains why it says that on Shimano parts 🙂.

    Quoted message said:

    Good luck with your tandem, whatever it may be!

    Thanks, Andrew.

    After talking briefly with the seller, it appears to be a pretty old,
    probably 3-speed (hub gear) tandem, apparently in lightly-used shape.
    It's blue, chrome fenders, some sort of flat or "priest" or typical 3-
    speed handlebar.

    I'm going to see the bike tonight (the price is in my range, and I
    just want a "around the park" tandem for me and the missus). I don't
    want a bike that will fall apart in a mile, but looks are probably
    more important than how many gears it has.

    Any general remarks on tandems of this type? Is there likely to be
    some freaky Italy-specific issues I might not expect versus, say, an
    English or American tandem of the same era?

  4. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Ryan Cousineau said:

    I'm trying to chase down the provenance of a bike I haven't seen yet.
    At a guess, I google-translated the name, and (as many of you know) it
    means "patented" in the land of Giros and Fiats.
    Any ideas what make of tandem would likely be misidentified this way? Or
    is it a real marque?
    I hope to take a look at it fairly shortly.

    Quoted message said:
    A Muzi said:

    Can't help with your specific problem but it happens all the time.
    He has no idea what it is. He looked at a part marked -
    Brevettata= Patented, Italy
    VIA= Japanese Vehicle Industry Association, a qualitative certification

    Quoted message said:

    Well, that at least explains why it says that on Shimano parts 🙂.
    After talking briefly with the seller, it appears to be a pretty old,
    probably 3-speed (hub gear) tandem, apparently in lightly-used shape.
    It's blue, chrome fenders, some sort of flat or "priest" or typical 3-
    speed handlebar.

    I'm going to see the bike tonight (the price is in my range, and I
    just want a "around the park" tandem for me and the missus). I don't
    want a bike that will fall apart in a mile, but looks are probably
    more important than how many gears it has.

    Any general remarks on tandems of this type? Is there likely to be
    some freaky Italy-specific issues I might not expect versus, say, an
    English or American tandem of the same era?

    Send photos to me or some other doddering old bikie for a general
    assessment. Or, better, post some photos for RBT review! There aren't
    simple guidelines but we can help you avoid known or obvious troubles.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  5. "A Muzi" <[email hidden]> a écrit:

    Quoted message said:

    Brevettata= Patented, Italy
    Brevete= Patented, France
    SGCG= French engineering society

    I think you might be thinking of SGDG, "Sans Garantie du Gouvernement", a
    disclaimer issued by the state meaning that the granting of a patent is not
    an endorsement of fitness for purpose:

    http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sans_garantie_du_gouvernement

    James Thomson

  6. Quoted message said:

    "A Muzi" <[email hidden]> a écrit:

    Quoted message said:

    Brevettata= Patented, Italy
    Brevete= Patented, France
    SGCG= French engineering society

    James Thomson said:

    I think you might be thinking of SGDG, "Sans Garantie du Gouvernement", a
    disclaimer issued by the state meaning that the granting of a patent is not
    an endorsement of fitness for purpose:
    http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sans_garantie_du_gouvernement

    Yes, a typo, sorry.
    Thank you
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  7. Quoted message said:

    "A Muzi" <[email hidden]> a écrit:

    Quoted message said:

    Brevettata= Patented, Italy
    Brevete= Patented, France
    SGCG= French engineering society

    James Thomson said:

    I think you might be thinking of SGDG, "Sans Garantie du Gouvernement", a
    disclaimer issued by the state meaning that the granting of a patent is not
    an endorsement of fitness for purpose:
    http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sans_garantie_du_gouvernement

    I just read the article. I was wrong, it is not similar to SICC at all.
    Thank you _very _ much.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,

    A Muzi said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Ryan Cousineau wrote:
    > I'm trying to chase down the provenance of a bike I haven't seen yet.
    > At a guess, I google-translated the name, and (as many of you know) it
    > means "patented" in the land of Giros and Fiats.
    > Any ideas what make of tandem would likely be misidentified this way? Or
    > is it a real marque?
    > I hope to take a look at it fairly shortly.

    Quoted message said:
    A Muzi said:

    Can't help with your specific problem but it happens all the time.
    He has no idea what it is. He looked at a part marked -
    Brevettata= Patented, Italy

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm going to see the bike tonight (the price is in my range, and I
    just want a "around the park" tandem for me and the missus). I don't
    want a bike that will fall apart in a mile, but looks are probably
    more important than how many gears it has.

    Any general remarks on tandems of this type? Is there likely to be
    some freaky Italy-specific issues I might not expect versus, say, an
    English or American tandem of the same era?

    Send photos to me or some other doddering old bikie for a general
    assessment. Or, better, post some photos for RBT review! There aren't
    simple guidelines but we can help you avoid known or obvious troubles.

    Well, you can't help me avoid trouble now that I've bought the bike!

    It turns out it was...a 20"-wheeled folding(ish) tandem!

    http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380853/in/photostream/

    Note graceful curved, integral rack/rear end.

    http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380855/in/photostream/

    Here's the head badge ("G"😉 and frame sticker.

    http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380857/in/photostream/
    http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380859/in/photostream/

    Sorry about the taken-in-haste (repent at leisure) photos.
    There's another badge that is all but obliterated, except for some faint
    traces of the Italian tricolour. The notorious "BREVETTATA" badges were
    just under the seatpost clamps on both seat tubes.

    Cottered cranks, Aprilia (!) lighting system driven by a sidewall
    generator, Carnielli (?) saddles. The strange hanging dropouts seem to
    have a "C" cut into them (the second photo shows the mirror-image one on
    the left side)

    The frame has a proper split-shell eccentric front BB, and all the
    frame's folding points (seatposts, hinge, bars, stem) have 8mm hex bolts
    in them.

    The brakes are Sturmey-Archer drums front and rear. The rear is an AB
    (cable-operated drum) 3-speed hub stamped "70", which should be the
    production year. Hub seems in good order, but only one gear is available
    right now. That's the first order of business.

    The shifter is mounted on the stoker's seatpost.

    The "keel tube" is a pair of parallel bolted-in tubes about the same
    diameter as the rear rack/triangle/whatever tubing. The rear "triangle"
    also appears unboltable, though you'd have to be trying to fit this
    sucker in a Cinquecento to want to do so, I suspect.

    It's shopworn, but obviously lightly used. It looks cute and amusingly
    retro. It should hold up well for around the park. The frame appears to
    be braced in all the likely failure points, and construction is by
    indifferent-looking welds.

    C$220 took the whole thing away.

    So, what is it?

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
    "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
    to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

  9. Ryan Cousineau said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    A Muzi said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Ryan Cousineau wrote:
    >> I'm trying to chase down the provenance of a bike I haven't seen yet.
    >> At a guess, I google-translated the name, and (as many of you know) it
    >> means "patented" in the land of Giros and Fiats.
    >> Any ideas what make of tandem would likely be misidentified this way? Or
    >> is it a real marque?
    >> I hope to take a look at it fairly shortly.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    A Muzi <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > Can't help with your specific problem but it happens all the time.
    > He has no idea what it is. He looked at a part marked -
    > Brevettata= Patented, Italy
    I'm going to see the bike tonight (the price is in my range, and I
    just want a "around the park" tandem for me and the missus). I don't
    want a bike that will fall apart in a mile, but looks are probably
    more important than how many gears it has.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Any general remarks on tandems of this type? Is there likely to be
    some freaky Italy-specific issues I might not expect versus, say, an
    English or American tandem of the same era?

    Quoted message said:

    Send photos to me or some other doddering old bikie for a general
    assessment. Or, better, post some photos for RBT review! There aren't
    simple guidelines but we can help you avoid known or obvious troubles.

    Well, you can't help me avoid trouble now that I've bought the bike!

    It turns out it was...a 20"-wheeled folding(ish) tandem!

    http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380853/in/photostream/

    Note graceful curved, integral rack/rear end.

    http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380855/in/photostream/

    Here's the head badge ("G"😉 and frame sticker.

    http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380857/in/photostream/http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380859/in/photostream/

    Sorry about the taken-in-haste (repent at leisure) photos.
    There's another badge that is all but obliterated, except for some faint
    traces of the Italian tricolour. The notorious "BREVETTATA" badges were
    just under the seatpost clamps on both seat tubes.

    Cottered cranks, Aprilia (!) lighting system driven by a sidewall
    generator, Carnielli (?) saddles. The strange hanging dropouts seem to
    have a "C" cut into them (the second photo shows the mirror-image one on
    the left side)

    The frame has a proper split-shell eccentric front BB, and all the
    frame's folding points (seatposts, hinge, bars, stem) have 8mm hex bolts
    in them.

    The brakes are Sturmey-Archer drums front and rear. The rear is an AB
    (cable-operated drum) 3-speed hub stamped "70", which should be the
    production year. Hub seems in good order, but only one gear is available
    right now. That's the first order of business.

    The shifter is mounted on the stoker's seatpost.

    The "keel tube" is a pair of parallel bolted-in tubes about the same
    diameter as the rear rack/triangle/whatever tubing. The rear "triangle"
    also appears unboltable, though you'd have to be trying to fit this
    sucker in a Cinquecento to want to do so, I suspect.

    It's shopworn, but obviously lightly used. It looks cute and amusingly
    retro. It should hold up well for around the park. The frame appears to
    be braced in all the likely failure points, and construction is by
    indifferent-looking welds.

    C$220 took the whole thing away.

    So, what is it?

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden]://www.wiredcola.com/
    "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
    to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos- Hide quoted text -

    - Show quoted text -

    I've had a couple of those gimmicks in the non-tandem version. One
    said that it was made by Bianchi, and made in Italy. I've had another
    one with identical construction that bore some Frenchy name I can't
    recall.

    All I can say is that what they had in style they lacked in any sort
    of torsional rigidity. They're commically flexy, from the handlebars
    on down, so doubling up on one, ESPECIALLY as a single speed...if you
    see anything that looks like a hill, head in the other direction.

    Keep an eye on them quick releases, especially the one that holds the
    stem in place. The ones on my bikes were an insult to Tullio.

    With all that said, it'll be a funny little ride and will def raise
    some smiles.

    /s

    ps: Oh yeah, I don't believe that ANY of those parts followed any kind
    of standard, so don't leave it out in the snow 😉

  10. Ryan Cousineau said:

    Well, you can't help me avoid trouble now that I've bought the bike!

    It turns out it was...a 20"-wheeled folding(ish) tandem!

    http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380853/in/photostream/

    Durndest looking thing. Are those front and rear drum brakes? Good
    thing that it won't be able to climb worth a damn, because trying to
    stop with those on a downhill would be interesting. But it will
    certainly get some attention.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    Enron's slogan: Respect, Communication, Integrity, and Excellence.

  11. David L. Johnson said:
    Ryan Cousineau said:

    Well, you can't help me avoid trouble now that I've bought the bike!

    It turns out it was...a 20"-wheeled folding(ish) tandem!

    http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380853/in/photostream/

    Durndest looking thing. Are those front and rear drum brakes? Good
    thing that it won't be able to climb worth a damn, because trying to
    stop with those on a downhill would be interesting. But it will
    certainly get some attention.

    Drum brakes are more effective with small wheels.

  12. Quoted message said:
    David L. Johnson said:
    Ryan Cousineau said:

    Well, you can't help me avoid trouble now that I've bought the bike!

    It turns out it was...a 20"-wheeled folding(ish) tandem!

    http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380853/in/photostream/

    Durndest looking thing. Are those front and rear drum brakes? Good
    thing that it won't be able to climb worth a damn, because trying to
    stop with those on a downhill would be interesting. But it will
    certainly get some attention.

    Drum brakes are more effective with small wheels.

    Dear J,

    Is this a matter of rim caliper brakes being less effective on small
    wheels? Or what?

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  13. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:15:14 -0500, "David L. Johnson"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Ryan Cousineau wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Well, you can't help me avoid trouble now that I've bought the bike!

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > It turns out it was...a 20"-wheeled folding(ish) tandem!

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380853/in/photostream/

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Durndest looking thing. Are those front and rear drum brakes? Good
    thing that it won't be able to climb worth a damn, because trying to
    stop with those on a downhill would be interesting. But it will
    certainly get some attention.

    Quoted message said:

    Drum brakes are more effective with small wheels.

    Dear J,

    Is this a matter of rim caliper brakes being less effective on small
    wheels? Or what?

    Considering that this thing uses steel rims, I'm pretty happy about
    the drum brakes. And yes, it has front and rear S-A drum brakes (rear
    is integrated into an "AB" 3-speed hub).

  14. -snip-

    Ryan Cousineau said:

    Well, you can't help me avoid trouble now that I've bought the bike!
    It turns out it was...a 20"-wheeled folding(ish) tandem!
    http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380853/in/photostream/
    Note graceful curved, integral rack/rear end.
    http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380855/in/photostream/
    Here's the head badge ("G"😉 and frame sticker.
    http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380857/in/photostream/
    http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380859/in/photostream/
    Sorry about the taken-in-haste (repent at leisure) photos.
    There's another badge that is all but obliterated, except for some faint
    traces of the Italian tricolour. The notorious "BREVETTATA" badges were
    just under the seatpost clamps on both seat tubes.
    Cottered cranks, Aprilia (!) lighting system driven by a sidewall
    generator, Carnielli (?) saddles. The strange hanging dropouts seem to
    have a "C" cut into them (the second photo shows the mirror-image one on
    the left side)
    The frame has a proper split-shell eccentric front BB, and all the
    frame's folding points (seatposts, hinge, bars, stem) have 8mm hex bolts
    in them.
    The brakes are Sturmey-Archer drums front and rear. The rear is an AB
    (cable-operated drum) 3-speed hub stamped "70", which should be the
    production year. Hub seems in good order, but only one gear is available
    right now. That's the first order of business.
    The shifter is mounted on the stoker's seatpost.
    The "keel tube" is a pair of parallel bolted-in tubes about the same
    diameter as the rear rack/triangle/whatever tubing. The rear "triangle"
    also appears unboltable, though you'd have to be trying to fit this
    sucker in a Cinquecento to want to do so, I suspect.
    It's shopworn, but obviously lightly used. It looks cute and amusingly
    retro. It should hold up well for around the park. The frame appears to
    be braced in all the likely failure points, and construction is by
    indifferent-looking welds.
    C$220 took the whole thing away.
    So, what is it?

    Most probably made by Carnielli (they made Bottecchia & Graziella
    besides Carnielli label exercise/child/specialty bikes). These 20-inch
    frame system components were sold to many European manufacturers. You
    can see the similarity to my Bianchi. Gitane, Cazenave, etc, etc were
    built from the same parts with minor detail changes.

    http://www.yellowjersey.org/aq.html
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  15. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Ryan Cousineau wrote:
    > Well, you can't help me avoid trouble now that I've bought the bike!
    > It turns out it was...a 20"-wheeled folding(ish) tandem!
    > http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380853/in/photostream/

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    David L. Johnson said:

    Durndest looking thing. Are those front and rear drum brakes? Good
    thing that it won't be able to climb worth a damn, because trying to
    stop with those on a downhill would be interesting. But it will
    certainly get some attention.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Drum brakes are more effective with small wheels.

    Quoted message said:

    Is this a matter of rim caliper brakes being less effective on small
    wheels? Or what?

    With a 20" wheel you can skid a drum, can't with a 'full size' wheel

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  16. On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:46:32 -0600, A Muzi <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Ryan Cousineau wrote:
    >> Well, you can't help me avoid trouble now that I've bought the bike!
    >> It turns out it was...a 20"-wheeled folding(ish) tandem!
    >> http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380853/in/photostream/

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "David L. Johnson" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > Durndest looking thing. Are those front and rear drum brakes? Good
    > thing that it won't be able to climb worth a damn, because trying to
    > stop with those on a downhill would be interesting. But it will
    > certainly get some attention.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Drum brakes are more effective with small wheels.

    Quoted message said:

    Is this a matter of rim caliper brakes being less effective on small
    wheels? Or what?

    With a 20" wheel you can skid a drum, can't with a 'full size' wheel

    Dear Andrew,

    Any idea why?

    Can you skid a 20" rim caliper? (Fogel Labs does not stock the wheel
    or courage needed to test what I presume are front wheel skids.)

    I'm not arguing, just curious whether all brakes are more effective on
    smaller wheels or if reducing the wheel size favors drums over rim
    calipers or what.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  17. Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:46:32 -0600, A Muzi <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> Ryan Cousineau wrote:
    >>> Well, you can't help me avoid trouble now that I've bought the bike!
    >>> It turns out it was...a 20"-wheeled folding(ish) tandem!
    >>> http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380853/in/photostream/

    Quoted message said:

    > "David L. Johnson" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >> Durndest looking thing. Are those front and rear drum brakes? Good
    >> thing that it won't be able to climb worth a damn, because trying to
    >> stop with those on a downhill would be interesting. But it will
    >> certainly get some attention.

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] wrote:
    > Drum brakes are more effective with small wheels.

    Quoted message said:

    Is this a matter of rim caliper brakes being less effective on small
    wheels? Or what?

    With a 20" wheel you can skid a drum, can't with a 'full size' wheel

    Dear Andrew,

    Any idea why?

    Can you skid a 20" rim caliper? (Fogel Labs does not stock the wheel
    or courage needed to test what I presume are front wheel skids.)

    I'm not arguing, just curious whether all brakes are more effective on
    smaller wheels or if reducing the wheel size favors drums over rim
    calipers or what.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    Looking at what Andrew wrote one more time, I wonder if the idea is
    that a drum can skid a 20" wheel, but a drum can't skid a 27" or 700c
    wheel?

    So before I find out why, I need to figure out what people are saying.

    My guess is that almost any brake can skid any rear tire.

    700c front rim caliper
    Can or can't skid?
    (Can't is my understanding.)

    700c front drum
    Can or can't skid?
    (I'm guessing can't.)

    20" front rim caliper
    Can or can't skid?
    (I'd guess can't, but maybe people are saying can?)

    20" front drum
    Can or can't skid?
    (I'm surprised, but people seem to be saying it can?)

    CF

  18. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Is this a matter of rim caliper brakes being less effective on small
    wheels? Or what?


    With a 20" wheel you can skid a drum, can't with a 'full size' wheel

    Dear Andrew,

    Any idea why?

    I'll volunteer an idea. A 20" wheel has less leverage between the road
    and the hub than a 27" wheel; the amount of braking force at the hub
    would be twice as much for a wheel of twice the radius, to get the same
    braking force at the tire.

    On the other hand, since a caliper brake is at the rim, the braking
    force of a caliper brake would be independent of the wheel radius.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm not arguing, just curious whether all brakes are more effective on
    smaller wheels or if reducing the wheel size favors drums over rim
    calipers or what.

    I'd say that small wheel size favors drums over calipers.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    Enron's slogan: Respect, Communication, Integrity, and Excellence.

  19. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:46:32 -0600, A Muzi <[email hidden]>
    wrote:


    [...]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    With a 20" wheel you can skid a drum, can't with a 'full size' wheel

    Dear Andrew,

    Any idea why?

    Can you skid a 20" rim caliper? (Fogel Labs does not stock the wheel
    or courage needed to test what I presume are front wheel skids.)

    I'm not arguing, just curious whether all brakes are more effective on
    smaller wheels or if reducing the wheel size favors drums over rim
    calipers or what.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    Looking at what Andrew wrote one more time, I wonder if the idea is
    that a drum can skid a 20" wheel, but a drum can't skid a 27" or 700c
    wheel?

    So before I find out why, I need to figure out what people are saying.

    My guess is that almost any brake can skid any rear tire.

    It should be able to, especially if you jam it on quite sharply, to be
    sure to lock the wheel before the braking surfaces get a chance to heat
    up too much.

    Whether you can skid the front wheel depends on whether you endo first,
    which you might expect to be the case on a dry road with a good tyre. It
    also depends on how far back/forward your weight is.

    But there is another question about wheel size which I have been
    puzzling over and still don't have an answer to.

    If the front wheel is locked, the bicycle and its front wheel can be
    regarded as a single rigid body. There is a force rearwards
    acting at the contact patch, and from that you can work out the torque
    on the bike, and at what rate of deceleration it will endo.

    But what if the front wheel isn't locked? In this case the system is not
    a single rigid body, but is more complex. I initially started modeling
    this as a rearwards force on the bicycle acting at the front axle
    instead of at the ground, but I won't try to explain this further until
    I feel more like I've figured out whether it's right or not. And if you
    think about it, there are two ways to endo-- you can pivot around the
    front tyre contact patch, or you can pivot around the front axle, with
    the front wheel still turning.

    If you are pivoting around the front axle, a smaller front wheel will
    tend to make it easier to endo (and hence harder to skid the front
    wheel), since the perpendicular distance from where the force is acting
    to the centre of mass is greater.

    Here is a herring to think about: imagine a bike with enormous wheels
    and a low-slung seating position, such that you are 1m above the ground,
    but half a metre _below_ the centres of the huge wheels. Now imagine a
    similar bike, with the same wheelbase, but with small wheels. You are
    still 1m above the ground, but now you are also half a metre above the
    centres of the wheels. Will the second bike be easier to endo? Either
    bike can theoretically endo around the contact patch, the first one
    you'd think can't endo around the axle.

    Quoted message said:

    700c front rim caliper
    Can or can't skid?
    (Can't is my understanding.)

    My estimate is can if the road is a bit slippery.

    Quoted message said:

    700c front drum
    Can or can't skid?
    (I'm guessing can't.)

    Can if the road is slippery and the drum effective.

    Quoted message said:

    20" front rim caliper
    Can or can't skid?
    (I'd guess can't, but maybe people are saying can?)

    20" front drum
    Can or can't skid?
    (I'm surprised, but people seem to be saying it can?)

    If the drum brake is only able to exert a certain maximum force, then
    that will result in a smaller force at the contact patch for a bigger
    wheel as in a bigger wheel the drum is at a greater mechanical
    disadvantage. This may be a reason why it might be easier in practice to
    skid the smaller wheel with a drum brake.

    But if you believe my herring about where braking forces act, then you
    would expect the smaller wheeled bike to endo easier, and that there
    will therefore be some road conditions in which its ability to skid is
    limited by its tendency to endo.

  20. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> Ryan Cousineau wrote:
    >>> Well, you can't help me avoid trouble now that I've bought the bike!
    >>> It turns out it was...a 20"-wheeled folding(ish) tandem!
    >>> http://flickr.com/photos/rcousine/413380853/in/photostream/

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > "David L. Johnson" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >> Durndest looking thing. Are those front and rear drum brakes? Good
    >> thing that it won't be able to climb worth a damn, because trying to
    >> stop with those on a downhill would be interesting. But it will
    >> certainly get some attention.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] wrote:
    > Drum brakes are more effective with small wheels.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Is this a matter of rim caliper brakes being less effective on small
    wheels? Or what?

    Quoted message said:
    A Muzi said:

    With a 20" wheel you can skid a drum, can't with a 'full size' wheel

    Quoted message said:

    Can you skid a 20" rim caliper? (Fogel Labs does not stock the wheel
    or courage needed to test what I presume are front wheel skids.)
    I'm not arguing, just curious whether all brakes are more effective on
    smaller wheels or if reducing the wheel size favors drums over rim
    calipers or what.

    No mystery, I think you can _see_ it. The ratio of the drum diameter to
    rim diameter is more favorable. Ask any mechanic who ever built a
    Schwinn Crate new out out of the box. On a tile floor.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.