warren said:Quoted message said:Sorry, perhaps I wasn't clear in my original post. I was referring to emergency braking on a
good surface in a straight line. Armstrong was braking in a straight line as he came past the
outside of Beloki. This section of the faq states once more that front brake only is the
quickest way to decelerate as long as you're not banked in the middle of a turn.
Then it's wrong. Think about my question again...
"Don't you think that having two tires making contact/friction with the ground (with the brakes
applied) would work better than one?"
Uh, no. Because if the rear wheel still has significant traction, you aren't applying enough front
brake. Because of the weight shift toward the front, all the traction, and hence braking power, is
there. You can get it to the point where any braking on the rear will make it slide.
It's true for both motorcycles and bicycles, though the motorcyclists I know seem to have an easier
time grasping this.
Oh, and to the person mentioning certain motorcyclists using the rear brake to slide the rear end. .
. I can't vouch for those particular motorcyclists, but most don't use the rear brake to do that.
Front braking will unweight the rear so much that throttle can be used to do that. Rear brake
usually used to "trail brake" into a turn, and take up drivetrain slack just before significant
power is applied to prevent lash.
When it comes to turning, motorcycles diverge from bicycles somewhat because of the engine. . .
there are different techniques available because of it. Braking is largely the same though.
People always seem to bring up the ability to flip a bike over with the front brake. Sure, that's
possible, but it is exactly that power that makes it worth using, and using well, to its full
potential.
The FAQ and Sheldon are right. Go practice.