Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Brake question

Started by Robin Hubert · · Last activity · 21 posts · 554 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
27 February 2005
Last activity
1 March 2005
Original author
Robin Hubert
Posts
21
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
554
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–21 of 21
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. On 28 Feb 2005 19:11:24 -0800, Ed <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden]
    says...

    Quoted message said:


    Robin Hubert said:

    [email hidden] wrote:
    > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:19:31 GMT, Robin Hubert

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    > Dear Robin,
    >
    > Can you measure the arms in a few dimensions?
    >
    > That is, what are the distances from the middle of the brake
    > pad to the pivot and from the pivot to where the cable
    > action is applied?
    >
    > With those, we could work out the actual mechanical
    > advantage--the difference alone at one point isn't enough.
    >
    > Long reach pad to pivot: xx mm
    > Long reach pivot to cable: xx mm
    >
    > Short reach pad to pivot: xx mm
    > Short reach pivot to cable: xx mm
    >
    > The leverage may not be the culprit, but you seem to be
    > saying that everything is about the same except that one
    > rear brake is a short reach and the other is a long reach.
    >
    > Carl Fogel

    Hi Carl,

    These are measurments from the pads.
    74/53mm for the long reach, and 80/49mm for the short reach. I reckon
    the pivot to cable (which I take to mean the top of the arm at the bbl
    adjuster) can be exrapolated from the above to 21mm and 31mm
    respectively (I hesitate to run downstairs again).

    Is this the information you're looking for?

    Thanks,
    Robin Hubert

    Dear Robin,

    That's getting closer, but not quite what's needed.
    Sheldon's reply is a pretty good explanation, and here's an
    etch-a-sketch diagram:

    cable attaches
    C
    .
    . brake arm pivot
    P .
    x .
    x .
    x |
    x |
    x |
    B | <--brake pad on slotted arm
    |
    |


    On a Shimano 105 I measured C to P as 52mm, P to B as 52mm. Also Cable to P as
    44mm per Sheldon. All measurements +/- 1mm.

    Dear Ed,

    If I'm following you, then the cable side of the see-saw (or
    the handle side of the pliers) is 44 mm directly from cable
    to pivot, and the brake-pad side of the see-saw (or the jaws
    of the pliers) is 52 mm.

    Cable x---------- -----------x Brake Pad
    44 ^ 52
    Pivot

    It doesn't matter if the line is straight or angles at the
    pivot--just the straight-line distances from the pivot to
    each end-point. A brake arm's leverage will work just as
    well at an angle, as shown below, or even with one arm
    running right past the other (which is how the endless set
    of sun-ray gear-teeth on the front chain-ring work,
    including the tooth right next to the longer lever arm of
    the pedal, with the long levers of the spokes on the rear
    wheel doing the same thing next to the much shorter levers
    of the cogs).

    /
    /
    \ /
    \ /
    \ /
    \ /
    \ /
    \ /
    \/
    pivot

    This would produce a mechanical disadvantage. A 10 pound
    force on the cable would produce (11/13) * 10 pounds at the
    brake pad, reducing it to about 8.5 pounds (over a wider
    arc).

    If I'm misunderstanding you and both distances are and
    identical 52 mm, then the see-saw leverage is dead even and
    there's no change beyond the slight frictional loss at the
    pivot.

    Carl Fogel

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.