General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Bradley smokers?

Started by modom (palindrome guy) · · Last activity · 34 posts · 494 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
5 July 2007
Last activity
13 July 2007
Original author
modom (palindrome guy)
Posts
34
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
494
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 34
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Anybody have experience and opinions about these?
    http://www.bradleysmoker.com/main-page.asp?body=products.html
    --

    modom

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  2. "modom (palindrome guy)" <moc.etoyok@modom> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Anybody have experience and opinions about these?
    http://www.bradleysmoker.com/main-page.asp?body=products.html
    --

    modom

    Ask on alt.food.barbecue There has been some good and bad about them. You
    have to buy their smoking discs instead of regular wood chips. Some liked
    them but a couple in hot regions (ambient 115 degrees) did not like the
    taste from them, probably because it did not burn hot enough to burn off the
    creosote.

    I just got one of these
    http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=3342508
    Good deal for the price. Did briskets and a pork picnic today. Only used it
    three times so far, but results are very good.

  3. modom (palindrome guy) said:

    Anybody have experience and opinions about these?
    http://www.bradleysmoker.com/main-page.asp?body=products.html

    As someone who has used virtually every bbq pit out there, including
    commercial pits, I honestly don't like the Bradely. A number of folks who
    have used them have ended up selling them.

    You are stuck with their proprietary 'biscuits' as fuel. The biscuits are
    expensive, and have been the source of numerous problems. They must be
    carefully stored. If they swell due to humidity, or if the have sawdust or
    chips stuck to them, etc. they can get stuck in the feeder. They are sold
    as a 'set and forget' machine, but they only hold eight hours worth of
    biscuits; not sufficient for the typical sized pork butt or briskets.

    I also find that they tend not to be as consistent as one would think it
    would be about the bbq it produces. If not monitored closely, sometimes the
    smoke flavoring is non-existent, at other times it can be overpowering. It
    needs to be watched in order to get it to perform its best, which takes away
    from one of the major selling points.

    As with any device, there are fanatic Bradely proponents. They are
    enthusiastic about the machine.

    But for me, the Bradely is too gimicky for my taste. It is too expensive to
    run compared to a WSM, and it really isn't much more convenient. It is too
    prone to potential problems and inconsistent cooking to make me feel
    comfortable about leaving it alone during cooking.

    --
    Dave
    www.davebbq.com

  4. modom (palindrome guy) said:

    Anybody have experience and opinions about these?
    http://www.bradleysmoker.com/main-page.asp?body=products.html

    You need to ask in alt.food.barbecue.

    They are indeed good smokers. You will get all the feedback you
    can possibly handle there, pre and post sale.

    -sw (who wants one, too).

  5. On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 21:36:27 -0500, "modom (palindrome guy)"

    moc.etoyok@modom said:

    Anybody have experience and opinions about these?
    http://www.bradleysmoker.com/main-page.asp?body=products.html
    --

    modom


    I had wondered about those as well..

    On eGullet, there is a long running thread about cooking from the
    Charcuterie book, and Michael Ruhlman is a contributer to that thread
    on occasion. Several folks on that thread have gotten Bradley
    smokers... Maybe you could ask there?

    I know they can do cold smoking as well...

    Christine

  6. "modom (palindrome guy)" <moc.etoyok@modom> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Anybody have experience and opinions about these?
    http://www.bradleysmoker.com/main-page.asp?body=products.html
    --

    modom

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

    I have a similar style thought not a Bradley that has worked great now for
    two years. Mine is like this on
    http://www.amazon.com/SMOKE-HOLLOW-Smoke-Hollow%C2%AE-Smoker/dp/B000OVPS4I/ref=sr_1_44/105-1125822-9118068?ie=UTF8&s=garden&qid=1183641584&sr=1-44
    that I purchased locally on sale for $90.

    Joe

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,
    moc.etoyok@modom says...

    Quoted message said:

    Anybody have experience and opinions about these?
    http://www.bradleysmoker.com/main-page.asp?body=products.html
    --

    modom


    If you're interested in an electric smoker that you can pretty much set
    and forget, check out the Cookshack products. They're more durable and
    efficient than the Bradleys, and they don't require the proprietary
    pucks to produce smoke.

    Bob

  8. I have a Bradley smoker, its great.
    The pucks can be expensive if bought at a local camping/hunting
    store but large discounts can be had by online stores.

    The big advantage with the Bradley is that it uses very little
    heat to produce the smoke so cold smoking of cheese etc is
    possible.

    Smoked old cheddar is magnificent.

    The Bradley forums are also a source of good recipes.

    If you like cold smoked products as well as hot smoked then
    Bradley is the way to go. Lox salmon is great with this smoker.

    If you can get the non digital smoker which is the slightly
    older model you have more options to customising the smoking
    process.

    ----------------------------------------------
    Posted with NewsLeecher v1.0 Final
    * Binary Usenet Leeching Made Easy
    * http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet
    ----------------------------------------------

  9. what creosote?
    There is no creosote in a Bradley puck, they use an edible binding
    gelatine to form the pucks.

    ----------------------------------------------
    Posted with NewsLeecher v1.0 Final
    * Binary Usenet Leeching Made Easy
    * http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet
    ----------------------------------------------

  10. Phil Evans said:

    what creosote?
    There is no creosote in a Bradley puck, they use an edible binding
    gelatine to form the pucks.

    Who, or what are you referring to? It helps to include the part of the text
    that you are responding to.

    Creosote is not an ingredient, it is a byproduct of incomplete wood or wood
    product combustion. From my experience Bradely smokers can, and have,
    produced creosote.
    --
    Dave
    www.davebbq.com

  11. yetanotherBob said:

    If you're interested in an electric smoker that you can pretty much
    set and forget, check out the Cookshack products. They're more
    durable and efficient than the Bradleys, and they don't require the
    proprietary pucks to produce smoke.

    I agree with Bob on this. You can use your own wood or lump charcoal. And a
    little goes a long way.
    http://www.cookshack.com/

    --
    Dave
    www.davebbq.com

  12. On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:20:43 -0400, "Joe Cilinceon" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    "modom (palindrome guy)" <moc.etoyok@modom> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Anybody have experience and opinions about these?
    http://www.bradleysmoker.com/main-page.asp?body=products.html

    I have a similar style thought not a Bradley that has worked great now for
    two years. Mine is like this on
    http://www.amazon.com/SMOKE-HOLLOW-Smoke-Hollow%C2%AE-Smoker/dp/B000OVPS4I/ref=sr_1_44/105-1125822-9118068?ie=UTF8&s=garden&qid=1183641584&sr=1-44
    that I purchased locally on sale for $90.

    Joe


    Thanks for the tip, Joe. Is it possible to cold smoke in this unit? I
    want to cold smoke a few things when the weather cools down.
    --

    modom

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  13. On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 02:59:58 GMT, "Edwin Pawlowski" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    Ask on alt.food.barbecue There has been some good and bad about them. You
    have to buy their smoking discs instead of regular wood chips. Some liked
    them but a couple in hot regions (ambient 115 degrees) did not like the
    taste from them, probably because it did not burn hot enough to burn off the
    creosote.

    I just got one of these
    http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=3342508
    Good deal for the price. Did briskets and a pork picnic today. Only used it
    three times so far, but results are very good.

    Thanks, Ed. Can you cold smoke in this unit? Or do you have to get
    an electric smoker for that?
    --

    modom

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  14. On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 20:13:54 -0700, "Dave Bugg" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    modom (palindrome guy) said:

    Anybody have experience and opinions about these?
    http://www.bradleysmoker.com/main-page.asp?body=products.html

    As someone who has used virtually every bbq pit out there, including
    commercial pits, I honestly don't like the Bradely. A number of folks who
    have used them have ended up selling them.

    You are stuck with their proprietary 'biscuits' as fuel. The biscuits are
    expensive, and have been the source of numerous problems. They must be
    carefully stored. If they swell due to humidity, or if the have sawdust or
    chips stuck to them, etc. they can get stuck in the feeder. They are sold
    as a 'set and forget' machine, but they only hold eight hours worth of
    biscuits; not sufficient for the typical sized pork butt or briskets.

    I also find that they tend not to be as consistent as one would think it
    would be about the bbq it produces. If not monitored closely, sometimes the
    smoke flavoring is non-existent, at other times it can be overpowering. It
    needs to be watched in order to get it to perform its best, which takes away
    from one of the major selling points.

    As with any device, there are fanatic Bradely proponents. They are
    enthusiastic about the machine.

    But for me, the Bradely is too gimicky for my taste. It is too expensive to
    run compared to a WSM, and it really isn't much more convenient. It is too
    prone to potential problems and inconsistent cooking to make me feel
    comfortable about leaving it alone during cooking.

    I appreciate your advice, Dave. It's obvious you know a lot about the
    subject. Thanks.
    --

    modom

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  15. "modom (palindrome guy)" <moc.etoyok@modom> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:20:43 -0400, "Joe Cilinceon" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    "modom (palindrome guy)" <moc.etoyok@modom> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Anybody have experience and opinions about these?
    http://www.bradleysmoker.com/main-page.asp?body=products.html

    I have a similar style thought not a Bradley that has worked great now for
    two years. Mine is like this on
    http://www.amazon.com/SMOKE-HOLLOW-Smoke-Hollow%C2%AE-Smoker/dp/B000OVPS4I/ref=sr_1_44/105-1125822-9118068?ie=UTF8&s=garden&qid=1183641584&sr=1-44
    that I purchased locally on sale for $90.

    Joe


    Thanks for the tip, Joe. Is it possible to cold smoke in this unit? I
    want to cold smoke a few things when the weather cools down.
    --

    modom

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

    No, I don't think it will do cold smoking at least what I think cold smoking
    is. I could be wrong in what I think cold smoking is, but assume you need to
    burn the wood making the smoke and stop the heat so it doesn't cook the food
    at all. This particular smoker works best between about 190 to 300 degrees.
    I tend to like to do most things at about 210 to 230 which is easy to set
    and hold steady. It will burn any wood out there that are in chip form even
    if you bust it up. It will also work with charcoal and even the pellet type
    wood chips. You can't use the gas however while using charcoal but with wood
    chips gas is the way to go with this smoker.

  16. modom (palindrome guy) said:

    I appreciate your advice, Dave. It's obvious you know a lot about the
    subject. Thanks.

    You're welcome. Let me know if there are any questions I can help with.
    --
    Dave
    www.davebbq.com

  17. On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:14:25 -0700, "Dave Bugg" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    modom (palindrome guy) said:

    I appreciate your advice, Dave. It's obvious you know a lot about the
    subject. Thanks.

    You're welcome. Let me know if there are any questions I can help with.

    Did you see my query about cold smoking? Is there a gas smoker out
    there you can cold smoke with?
    --

    modom

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  18. modom (palindrome guy) said:

    On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:14:25 -0700, "Dave Bugg" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    modom (palindrome guy) said:

    I appreciate your advice, Dave. It's obvious you know a lot about
    the subject. Thanks.

    You're welcome. Let me know if there are any questions I can help
    with.

    Did you see my query about cold smoking? Is there a gas smoker out
    there you can cold smoke with?

    I am not familiar with any non-commercial smokers. But the Cookshack
    electrics can do cold smoking.
    --
    Dave
    www.davebbq.com

  19. "modom (palindrome guy)" <moc.etoyok@modom> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    I just got one of these


    http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=3342508

    Quoted message said:


    Thanks, Ed. Can you cold smoke in this unit? Or do you have to get
    an electric smoker for that?

    No and yes. The setup as it is gets too hot, but, what I've done with my old
    (similar design) smoker is to use a $10 electric hotplate and a pan of
    sawdust for the smoke and it worked very well. You can use a hotplate and
    a cardboard box too.
    --
    Ed
    http://pages.cthome.net/edhome/

  20. On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:48:44 -0700, "Dave Bugg" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    modom (palindrome guy) said:


    Did you see my query about cold smoking? Is there a gas smoker out
    there you can cold smoke with?

    I am not familiar with any non-commercial smokers. But the Cookshack
    electrics can do cold smoking.

    Thanks again, Dave.

    I just dropped by the Wal-Mart in the county seat after dinner to look
    at the Great Outdoors smoker Ed linked to. The steel is a little
    lighter guage than in my old rusty New Braunfels pit, but I think on
    the whole it looks like a good design and durable enough. Especially
    for the price. I'm wondering if I could get the smoke going with the
    door open, drop the flame to almost nothing and stash a bigass pan of
    ice in the Great Outdoors unit to keep the temp below 90F to smoke
    some (salt cured) salmon?

    Those Cookshack smokers are too pricy for a hobbyist meat smoker on my
    income. They look like fantastic cookers, but *ouch* -- the cash.
    --

    modom

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.