In article <[email hidden]>, Tim Jackson
<[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said:Dominic Sexton wrote on Sat, 24 Jul 2004 10:53:59 +0100....
Quoted message said:Because the receiver knows that alkaline cells will happily supply it at
a lower voltage than NiMh (which have a very flat discharge voltage
profile).
Unfortunately Garmin seem to have got the setting wrong with NiMh and
switch the unit off before their capacity has been fully used.
If it's a flat discharge profile, that would make it difficult to get
the setting right.
Indeed. However it is not completely flat rather it is flat in the
middle of discharge and very much flatter than the discharge curve for
alkalines. The flat middle part of the curve makes it very difficult to
tell if the batteries are 1/4 used, 1/2 used or 3/4 used - you cannot
tell by voltage alone.
For freshly charged cells there is a curve at the start and end of
discharge. For cells that have been hanging around for a while since
charging the curve at the start of discharge is less pronounced.
Example discharge cures can be seen here:
NiMh AA
<http://data.energizer.com/datasheets/library/rechargeables/consumer/nimh
/nh15.pdf>
Alkaline AA
<http://data.energizer.com/datasheets/library/primary/alkaline/energizer/
consumer_oem/e91.pdf>
NiMh AAA
<http://data.energizer.com/datasheets/library/rechargeables/consumer/nimh
/nh12.pdf>
The Geko 201 being discussed uses about 100mA. From the curves shown in
the AAA datasheet above for 150mA and 75mA it can be seen that cutting
off at 1.2V instead of say 1.15V could lead to 1/2 an hour shorter life.
I don't know of anyone measuring what voltage Garmin is using for the
cut off when set to NiMh (so the above figures are just guesses) but it
is apparent that setting a Geko to alkaline will result in extending the
operating time compared to the NiMh setting.
--
Dominic Sexton
http://www.dscs.demon.co.uk/