Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Bottom Bracket Size Needed for Correct Chainline?

Started by Rosco · · Last activity · 6 posts · 1,523 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
2 November 2003
Last activity
3 November 2003
Original author
Rosco
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,523
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Just got a Raceface Turbine LP crank (26-36-48) with ISIS bottom bracket to put on my touring bike.
    The rear spacing is for 130mm hubs. The shop sold me a bottom bracket with 113mm spacing. The bottom
    bracket instructions say the ideal chainline for this equipment is 48.5 to 49.5mm.

    I measured the existing chainline before taking apart the bike, and found it to be about 46mm (to
    the center of middle chainring). Was this bottom bracket sold to me thinking that I had a 135mm rear
    spaced setup? Would a 108mm bottom bracket work better for my setup?

  2. rosco said:

    Just got a Raceface Turbine LP crank (26-36-48) with ISIS bottom bracket to put on my touring
    bike. The rear spacing is for 130mm hubs. The shop sold me a bottom bracket with 113mm spacing.
    The bottom bracket instructions say the ideal chainline for this equipment is 48.5 to 49.5mm.

    I measured the existing chainline before taking apart the bike, and found it to be about 46mm (to
    the center of middle chainring). Was this bottom bracket sold to me thinking that I had a 135mm
    rear spaced setup? Would a 108mm bottom bracket work better for my setup?

    Try measuring the existing chainline at front and rear (with the new cranks and a middle ring
    fitted) using the instructions at parktool.comclg2.shtml

    If there's a discrepancy you'll then know what size BB you need to correct it.

  3. rosco said:

    Just got a Raceface Turbine LP crank (26-36-48) with ISIS bottom bracket to put on my touring
    bike. The rear spacing is for 130mm hubs. The shop sold me a bottom bracket with 113mm spacing.
    The bottom bracket instructions say the ideal chainline for this equipment is 48.5 to 49.5mm.

    I measured the existing chainline before taking apart the bike, and found it to be about 46mm (to
    the center of middle chainring). Was this bottom bracket sold to me thinking that I had a 135mm
    rear spaced setup?

    Yes, it probably was meant for 135mm spacing, and you might benefit from a shorter bottom bracket. I
    use mountain bike cranks on my road bike, and did go for a shorter-than-recommended bottom bracket.
    It works fine, even when I put the granny on (which I use only for tours -- once per Summer).

    Measuring the chainline with what you have is a good idea.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | The lottery is a tax on those who fail to understand _`\(,_ | mathematics. (_)/ (_) |

  4. Quoted message said:

    Yes, it probably was meant for 135mm spacing, and you might benefit from a shorter bottom bracket.
    I use mountain bike cranks on my road bike, and did go for a shorter-than-recommended bottom
    bracket. It works fine, even when I put the granny on (which I use only for tours -- once per
    Summer).

    Measuring the chainline with what you have is a good idea.

    --

    Thank you.

    I really want to get this right without using the trial and error method. If I install the BB, I
    doubt it could then be returned if it's not right. I assembled the BB and crank off the bike and
    measured the distance between the middle chainring and the outer edge of the ISIS drive side cup
    (which according to instructions should sit 1mm outbound from a 68mm BB shell). This will definitely
    put the chainline out around 49 to 50mm.

    The second thing I've noticed is that MTB front deraileur's seem to spec a
    47.5mm chainline. If I end up with an ~46mm chainline, will the deraileur be my next problem?

  5. rosco said:

    The second thing I've noticed is that MTB front deraileur's seem to spec a
    47.5mm chainline. If I end up with an ~46mm chainline, will the deraileur be my next problem?

    I must have missed this. You have a mountain bike front derailleur? But 130mm rear dropouts? The
    change in derailleur adjustment should be doable, after all it's only 1.5mm, but I can't say I have
    done it. I have a road derailleur on the front.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | There is always an easy solution to every human problem - neat, _`\(,_ | plausible, and
    wrong. --H.L. Mencken (_)/ (_) |

  6. Quoted message said:

    I must have missed this. You have a mountain bike front derailleur? But 130mm rear dropouts? The
    change in derailleur adjustment should be doable, after all it's only 1.5mm, but I can't say I
    have done it. I have a road derailleur on the front.

    It's a 13 or 14 year old Bruce Gordon Rock 'n Road frame. I believe back then, 130mm was the MTB
    rear spacing.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.