Road Cycling · Public discussion

Born to be champ?

Started by Thomas Lund · · Last activity · 6 posts · 583 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
31 July 2004
Last activity
1 August 2004
Original author
Thomas Lund
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
583
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Headline from the Danish newspaper Politiken today:
    "The formula behind Armstrong's succes isn't chemical, but genetical. He was
    born to ride a bicycle"

    The article is written by Chris MacDonald (American? English?) - a scientist
    ("sport physiologist"?) at the University of Copenhagen's Institute for
    Sports. - He has during the TdF written quite a few interesting columns in
    the paper. - He is a Directeur Sportif for a womens cycle-team (Team SATS).

    The article seems convincing to me, rather dry and scientifically written
    though with a lot high brow talk about oxygen-kapacity, VO2max-numbers and
    stuff.
    About the ability to absord oxygen he presents a table with quite a
    significant marking for Lance Armstrong.

    I don't know if he has got the articles in English, but if you Google him on
    Danish sites, his mail address is easily found.

    I should think you will hear a lot about this in the coming time.

    Thomas Lund

  2. "Thomas Lund" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Headline from the Danish newspaper Politiken today:
    "The formula behind Armstrong's succes isn't chemical, but genetical. He


    was

    Quoted message said:

    born to ride a bicycle"

    The article is written by Chris MacDonald (American? English?) - a


    scientist

    Quoted message said:

    ("sport physiologist"?) at the University of Copenhagen's Institute for
    Sports. - He has during the TdF written quite a few interesting columns in
    the paper. - He is a Directeur Sportif for a womens cycle-team (Team


    SATS).

    Quoted message said:


    The article seems convincing to me, rather dry and scientifically written
    though with a lot high brow talk about oxygen-kapacity, VO2max-numbers and
    stuff.
    About the ability to absord oxygen he presents a table with quite a
    significant marking for Lance Armstrong.

    I don't know if he has got the articles in English, but if you Google him


    on

    Quoted message said:

    Danish sites, his mail address is easily found.

    I should think you will hear a lot about this in the coming time.

    Thomas Lund

    A friend of mine has seen detailed tomographic images of LA's interior and
    he said it's pretty amazing in there. I don't remember all the technical
    terms (he's a doc) but I do recall comments about freakishly large lungs,
    and huge main arteries and veins. In other words, I agree that there are
    explanations other than drugs.

  3. "Mark Fennell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:KMTOc.1618$wz.394@fed1read01...

    Quoted message said:

    "Thomas Lund" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Headline from the Danish newspaper Politiken today:
    "The formula behind Armstrong's succes isn't chemical, but genetical. He


    was

    Quoted message said:

    born to ride a bicycle"

    The article is written by Chris MacDonald (American? English?) - a


    scientist

    Quoted message said:

    ("sport physiologist"?) at the University of Copenhagen's Institute for
    Sports. - He has during the TdF written quite a few interesting columns


    in

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the paper. - He is a Directeur Sportif for a womens cycle-team (Team


    SATS).

    Quoted message said:


    The article seems convincing to me, rather dry and scientifically


    written

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    though with a lot high brow talk about oxygen-kapacity, VO2max-numbers


    and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    stuff.
    About the ability to absord oxygen he presents a table with quite a
    significant marking for Lance Armstrong.

    I don't know if he has got the articles in English, but if you Google


    him

    Quoted message said:

    on

    Quoted message said:

    Danish sites, his mail address is easily found.

    I should think you will hear a lot about this in the coming time.

    Thomas Lund

    A friend of mine has seen detailed tomographic images of LA's interior and
    he said it's pretty amazing in there. I don't remember all the technical
    terms (he's a doc) but I do recall comments about freakishly large lungs,
    and huge main arteries and veins. In other words, I agree that there are
    explanations other than drugs.

    Yeah, but none of this is new. We have heard this for a long time, long
    before Lance even had cancer.

  4. Chris said:

    Yeah, but none of this is new. We have heard this for a long time, long
    before Lance even had cancer.

    The kid was beating pro triathletes in his teens. Merckx predicted he'd
    eventually win the Tour back in 1993 or so.

    --
    --
    Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall
    "We should not march into Baghdad. ... Assigning young soldiers to
    a fruitless hunt for a securely entrenched dictator and condemning
    them to fight in what would be an unwinnable urban guerilla war, it
    could only plunge that part of the world into ever greater
    instability." George Bush Sr. in his 1998 book "A World Transformed"

  5. "Raptor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Chris said:

    Yeah, but none of this is new. We have heard this for a long time, long
    before Lance even had cancer.

    The kid was beating pro triathletes in his teens. Merckx predicted he'd
    eventually win the Tour back in 1993 or so.

    Another thing that so many people have forgotten is that Merckx was very
    close to Lance for many years. I don't remember precisely how it came
    together, but Eddy supplied Merckx and his Caloi brand to Motorola I think
    for their entire existance. I am now remembering that is goes even further
    back to the 7/11 era. Anyway, Eddy usually works closely with teams when he
    supplies bikes and was one of the first to help Lance get his position
    sorted out on the bike, among other things. Axel was also offered a contract
    for several years back when he had just turned pro (maybe in his second or
    third season). Eddy would have said that (Tour prediction) but in context,
    remember it was about a young kid that had just won at the World's Road Race
    at a very young age and also under his wing to some degree. It is also worth
    noting that he never said that about his own son even though Axel cracked
    the top 10 before Lance did.

    Quoted message said:

    --
    --
    Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall
    "We should not march into Baghdad. ... Assigning young soldiers to
    a fruitless hunt for a securely entrenched dictator and condemning
    them to fight in what would be an unwinnable urban guerilla war, it
    could only plunge that part of the world into ever greater
    instability." George Bush Sr. in his 1998 book "A World Transformed"

    The world view had changed dramatically since that was written. You are
    aware of the attacks on the WTC and Pentagon?

  6. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Chris said:

    "Raptor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Chris said:

    Yeah, but none of this is new. We have heard this for a long time, long
    before Lance even had cancer.

    The kid was beating pro triathletes in his teens. Merckx predicted he'd
    eventually win the Tour back in 1993 or so.

    Another thing that so many people have forgotten is that Merckx was very
    close to Lance for many years. I don't remember precisely how it came
    together, but Eddy supplied Merckx and his Caloi brand to Motorola I think
    for their entire existance. I am now remembering that is goes even further
    back to the 7/11 era. Anyway, Eddy usually works closely with teams when he
    supplies bikes and was one of the first to help Lance get his position
    sorted out on the bike, among other things. Axel was also offered a contract
    for several years back when he had just turned pro (maybe in his second or
    third season). Eddy would have said that (Tour prediction) but in context,
    remember it was about a young kid that had just won at the World's Road Race
    at a very young age and also under his wing to some degree. It is also worth
    noting that he never said that about his own son even though Axel cracked
    the top 10 before Lance did.

    I remember that there was some question about whether the bike LA won
    Worlds on was actually a Merckx or a rebadged/disguised Litespeed. I know
    that those two worked together for a while, but that race was (if I
    remember correctly) before that association.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall
    "We should not march into Baghdad. ... Assigning young soldiers to
    a fruitless hunt for a securely entrenched dictator and condemning
    them to fight in what would be an unwinnable urban guerilla war, it
    could only plunge that part of the world into ever greater
    instability." George Bush Sr. in his 1998 book "A World Transformed"

    The world view had changed dramatically since that was written. You are
    aware of the attacks on the WTC and Pentagon?

    Neither of which had anything to do with Iraq. Certainly the latter part
    of GHWB's statement seems to be proving to be a prescient one.

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    So far, so good, so what?

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.