General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

boots

Started by Colin Phillips · · Last activity · 37 posts · 1,951 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
29 February 2004
Last activity
27 March 2004
Original author
Colin Phillips
Posts
37
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,951
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–37 of 37
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Brian said:

    Don't go for boots the same size as your normal shoe size

    Why not? If you're wearing more/thicker socks then bigger would be better, but there isn't
    necessarily any need to do that. My old leathers are bigger, but I bought them back in the 80s when
    I thought you had to buy bigger, so now I *need* to wear two pairs of socks with them. But all my
    other boots are sized for one pair, and I'm basically a 43 whether I'm in my big plastic climbing or
    telemark boots or when I'm wearing trainers.

    The important thing is fit and comfort. There is *no* substitute for trying footwear on in person,
    in the socks you'll be expecting to wear or something very like them. Don't buy Brand X because
    someone says they're fab: they might have different shaped feet to you!

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch University of Dundee Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden]
    dundee.ac.uk~pjclinch

  2. On 1/3/04 3:22 pm, in article [email hidden],

    John Laird said:

    That would explain why Millets in Stockport were suddenly banished to a back street and a shiny
    new Blacks appeared in their old location. I don't think Millets ever shook off the army surplus
    store image.

    This is similar to the way it work in Birmingham -but for boots, especially, Millets is more
    competitive.

  3. Peter Clinch said:
    Brian said:

    Don't go for boots the same size as your normal shoe size

    Why not? If you're wearing more/thicker socks then bigger would be better, but there isn't
    necessarily any need to do that. My old leathers are bigger, but I bought them back in the 80s
    when I thought you had to buy bigger, so now I *need* to wear two pairs of socks with them. But
    all my other boots are sized for one pair, and I'm basically a 43 whether I'm in my big plastic
    climbing or telemark boots or when I'm wearing trainers.

    Its a moot point in my case as size 12 shoes don't fit me, so I just go for size 13s

    Quoted message said:

    The important thing is fit and comfort. There is *no*


    substitute for

    Quoted message said:

    trying footwear on in person, in the socks you'll be expecting to wear or something very like
    them. Don't buy Brand X because someone says they're fab: they might have different shaped
    feet to you!

    Pete.

    Good advise, I don't recommend purchasing boots by mail order, you really need to try them on
    in person.

    --
    Brian

  4. Thanks again everyone.

    Colin

  5. Quoted message said:

    Colin, you can pick up a pair of Berghaus Explorer GTX ( Gore-Tex ) for under £80 at Millets or
    Blacks. These are good value all round boots ( I wear them as summer boots on the Scottish
    mountains ). You can get waterproof boots from as little as £30 if you look hard enough

    If OP is trying to save some money then a topical hint would be to get down to his nearest
    YHA/Karrimor shop. In Brighton today there was much letting go of stock (including boots) at half
    price or less. Unfortunately the depths of my skintness don't allow me to partake in what would
    normally be a shark-like* feeding frenzy.

    *Does anyone know a word that means shark-like btw ?

    --
    Boo

  6. Boo boo@spam_me_no_spam.net said:

    *Does anyone know a word that means shark-like btw ?

    Lawyerly?

    --
    Some drink from the fountain of knowledge, others gargle.

    Mail john rather than nospam...

  7. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:
    Boo boo@spam_me_no_spam.net said:

    *Does anyone know a word that means shark-like btw ?

    Lawyerly?


    Google can't seem to come up with anything better than 'shark-like'. How boring of it.
    --
    Fran If you need my email address please ask.

  8. Fran said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:
    Boo boo@spam_me_no_spam.net said:

    *Does anyone know a word that means shark-like btw ?

    Lawyerly?


    Google can't seem to come up with anything better than 'shark-like'. How boring of it.

    You could coin a word. If dog-like is canine then you could have carcharodine, from Carcharodon
    carcharias, the scientific name for the great white shark. The only problem is that only a few
    sharks are genus Carcharodon.
    --
    Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks"

  9. "Andy Howell" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    True, but in many situations gaiters to help a great deal.

    I thought about buying some gaiters for trudging through the snow recently but decided on the
    cheapskate (and lightweight ofcourse following on from other threads) option of gaffer tape around
    the bottom of my waterproof trousers. Snow wasn't deep enough to bother in the end.

  10. "Brian" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Nick Hopton said:

    In a recent message <[email hidden]>, Colin Phillips
    <[email hidden]> wrote.

    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    I am looking for advice on the purchase of a pair of walking boots. I don't do severe walks but
    I do walk a lot on a daily basis. Top priority would be "waterproofness". Don't want to spend a
    fortune, top price of around 80 pounds. Would be grateful for some guidance, the more I look at
    sites the more confused I get.


    [...]

    When I asked a similar question some time ago the people here suggested Brasher Hillmaster
    Clasics, so this is what I bought. I've never regretted this, I can vouch for their
    watertightness and comfort, certainly on the longish walks (25-plus km) over wet and boggy
    ground that I've been doing recently. When I bought them, mine were on offer at Millets at a bit
    less than your budget price.

    I can vouch for the Brasher Hillmaster Classics. Good thing is they go up to a UK size 13! Which
    is good for my large feet. Didn't need any breaking in, and are nice and comfy. Which at the end
    of the day is all that matters!

    I've just got back from the Peak District where I tried out my new Brasher Tourlites and I love
    them! So much lighter and more flexible than my old Meindls.

    Nick

  11. Fran said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:
    Boo boo@spam_me_no_spam.net said:

    *Does anyone know a word that means shark-like btw ?

    Lawyerly?


    Google can't seem to come up with anything better than 'shark-like'. How boring of it.

    Found this.

    "cartilaginous (sharklike)"

    --
    Don`t Worry, Be Happy

    Sandy
    --

    E-Mail:- [email hidden] Website:- ftscotland.co.ukftscotland.co.uk IRC:- Sandyb in #rabble
    uk3.arcnet.vapor.com Port:6667 #Rabble Channel Website:- ftscotland.co.ukrabbled
    ICQ : 41266150

  12. In article <[email hidden]>, Sandy <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Fran said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 22:35:29 +0000, Boo <boo@spam_me_no_spam.net> wrote:

    > *Does anyone know a word that means shark-like btw ?

    Lawyerly?


    Google can't seem to come up with anything better than 'shark-like'. How boring of it.

    Found this.

    "cartilaginous (sharklike)"

    Not quite specific enough (even in the realm of fish)

    cartilaginous fish n. a fish of the class Selachii, with a skeleton of cartilage rather than bone,
    e.g. a shark, a ray.

    --

    dscs.demon.co.ukdscs.demon.co.uk

  13. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    *Does anyone know a word that means shark-like btw ?

    Lawyerly?

    Google can't seem to come up with anything better than 'shark-like'. How boring of it.

    Yes, presumeably there must be one. I may try and find one of those books of lists and other pub-
    quiz type trivia tomorrow.

    --
    Boo

  14. Quoted message said:

    You could coin a word. If dog-like is canine then you could have carcharodine, from Carcharodon
    carcharias, the scientific name for the great white shark. The only problem is that only a few
    sharks are genus Carcharodon.

    So that's no use then. :-) Actually I'm tasken by lawerly. Also, agently springs to and
    from mind. :-)

    --
    Boo

  15. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Google can't seem to come up with anything better than 'shark-like'. How boring of it.

    Found this.

    "cartilaginous (sharklike)"

    Doesn't that just mean "made of cartilage" ? I know that sharks are made of cartilage (instead of
    bone) but that wasn't really what I meant
    - I was referring more to their habit of swimming round and round their victim in packs tearing
    chunks off and turning the water red with blood rather than their unusual skeletal
    arrangements ;-)

    --
    Boo

  16. boo@spam_me_no_spam.net said...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Found this.

    "cartilaginous (sharklike)"

    Doesn't that just mean "made of cartilage" ? I know that sharks are made of cartilage (instead of
    bone) but that wasn't really what I meant
    - I was referring more to their habit of swimming round and round their victim in packs tearing
    chunks off and turning the water red with blood rather than their unusual skeletal
    arrangements ;-)

    Well in that case, I offer you - journalistic.
    --
    Fran If you need my email address please ask.

  17. In article <[email hidden]>,
    Andy Howell <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    That would explain why Millets in Stockport were suddenly
    banished to a back street and a shiny new Blacks appeared
    in their old location. I don't think Millets ever shook
    off the army surplus store image.

    This is similar to the way it work in Birmingham -but for
    boots, especially, Millets is more competitive.

    If the original poster can wait till autumn, Millets usually
    reduce the price of the Berghaus Explorer Boots from 79.00
    quid to around 59 quid. I waited and got them the cheaper
    rate. They give 10% more discount for RSPB members also to
    other organisations.

    BTW the boots are very comfortable.
    --
    Bill Grey billboy.co.ukbillboy.co.uk

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.